Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Norway-Sweden

The two largest European Peninsulas (Iberian and Scandinavian) are both divided by a long and ancient frontier, which separates four old European nations: Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Norway. In the first case, the unusual stability of the border, which remains almost unchanged for more than 800 year...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Area
Main Author: Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Royal Geographical Society 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10451/37039
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
id ftunivlisboa:oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/37039
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivlisboa:oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/37039 2023-05-15T16:50:36+02:00 Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Norway-Sweden Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha 2019-02-18T14:43:02Z http://hdl.handle.net/10451/37039 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x eng eng The Royal Geographical Society https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x Rocha Medeiros, E. J. (2010). Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Norway-Sweden. Area, 42(4), pp. 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x. 1475-4762 http://hdl.handle.net/10451/37039 doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x closedAccess Cross-border cooperation Interreg-A Polycentrism Socioeconomic cohesion article 2019 ftunivlisboa https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x 2022-05-25T18:39:23Z The two largest European Peninsulas (Iberian and Scandinavian) are both divided by a long and ancient frontier, which separates four old European nations: Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Norway. In the first case, the unusual stability of the border, which remains almost unchanged for more than 800 years, has contributed to strengthen a long ‘back-to-back’ existence, during most of this time. In the latter, however, successive changes in the border location, and historical alliances between the Nordic countries, created a more ‘face-to-face’ type of border and a more solid background for the cross-border cooperation (CBC). Therefore, while the INTERREG-A Community Initiative represented an important starting point for the CBC process in most parts of the Portuguese–Spanish border region (PSBR), it was just another important added value for the CBC in the Swedish–Norwegian border region (SNBR), since this process had already started in 1948, when Sweden, Norway, Iceland and Denmark established the joint Nordic Committee for Economic Cooperation, followed by the formation of the Nordic Council in 1951. With this in mind, this article analyses how such distinct CBC backgrounds contributed to the two different approaches and results obtained from the implementation of the INTERREG-A in both studied border regions. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Universidade de Lisboa: repositório.UL Norway Area 42 4 434 443
institution Open Polar
collection Universidade de Lisboa: repositório.UL
op_collection_id ftunivlisboa
language English
topic Cross-border cooperation
Interreg-A
Polycentrism
Socioeconomic cohesion
spellingShingle Cross-border cooperation
Interreg-A
Polycentrism
Socioeconomic cohesion
Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha
Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Norway-Sweden
topic_facet Cross-border cooperation
Interreg-A
Polycentrism
Socioeconomic cohesion
description The two largest European Peninsulas (Iberian and Scandinavian) are both divided by a long and ancient frontier, which separates four old European nations: Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Norway. In the first case, the unusual stability of the border, which remains almost unchanged for more than 800 years, has contributed to strengthen a long ‘back-to-back’ existence, during most of this time. In the latter, however, successive changes in the border location, and historical alliances between the Nordic countries, created a more ‘face-to-face’ type of border and a more solid background for the cross-border cooperation (CBC). Therefore, while the INTERREG-A Community Initiative represented an important starting point for the CBC process in most parts of the Portuguese–Spanish border region (PSBR), it was just another important added value for the CBC in the Swedish–Norwegian border region (SNBR), since this process had already started in 1948, when Sweden, Norway, Iceland and Denmark established the joint Nordic Committee for Economic Cooperation, followed by the formation of the Nordic Council in 1951. With this in mind, this article analyses how such distinct CBC backgrounds contributed to the two different approaches and results obtained from the implementation of the INTERREG-A in both studied border regions. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha
author_facet Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha
author_sort Medeiros, Eduardo José Rocha
title Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Norway-Sweden
title_short Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Norway-Sweden
title_full Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Norway-Sweden
title_fullStr Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Norway-Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Norway-Sweden
title_sort old vs recent cross-border cooperation: portugal-spain and norway-sweden
publisher The Royal Geographical Society
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/37039
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
Rocha Medeiros, E. J. (2010). Old vs recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Norway-Sweden. Area, 42(4), pp. 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x.
1475-4762
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/37039
doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
op_rights closedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
container_title Area
container_volume 42
container_issue 4
container_start_page 434
op_container_end_page 443
_version_ 1766040735491031040