Portugal country note

The international network on leave policies and research has been producing an annual review of leave policies and related research since 2005 (for earlier reviews, go to the network’s website: http://www.leavenetwork.org/archive_2005_2009/annual_reviews/). The review covers Maternity, Paternity and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wall, Karin, Leitão, Mafalda
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: The International Network on Leave Policies and Research 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10451/22763
id ftunivlisboa:oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/22763
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivlisboa:oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/22763 2023-05-15T16:51:27+02:00 Portugal country note Wall, Karin Leitão, Mafalda 2016-03-01T10:11:45Z http://hdl.handle.net/10451/22763 eng eng The International Network on Leave Policies and Research www.leavenetwork.org/fileadmin/Leavenetwork/Annual_reviews/2015_full_review3_final_8july.pdf Wall, K. & Leitão, M. (2015). Portugal country note. In P. Moss (Ed.), International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2015, pp. 261-270 http://hdl.handle.net/10451/22763 openAccess Famílias Parentalidade report 2016 ftunivlisboa 2022-05-25T18:35:23Z The international network on leave policies and research has been producing an annual review of leave policies and related research since 2005 (for earlier reviews, go to the network’s website: http://www.leavenetwork.org/archive_2005_2009/annual_reviews/). The review covers Maternity, Paternity and Parental leaves; leave to care for sick children and other employment-related measures to support working parents; and early childhood education and care policy. As well as policies, it provides information on publications and research. The review is based on country notes from each participating country, prepared by members of the network and edited by one of the network’s coordinators. Each country note follows a standard format: details of different types of leave; the relationship between leave policy and early childhood education and care policy; recent policy developments; information on take-up of leave; recent publications and current research projects. The review also includes definitions of the main types of leave policies; and cross-country comparisons. These comparative overviews cover: each main type of leave; total leave available; the relationship between leave and ECEC entitlements; policy changes and developments since the previous review; publications since the previous review; and ongoing research in participating countries The 2015 review includes three new countries: Malta, Mexico and Uruguay. Altogether, it covers 38 countries. In addition to the new countries, these are: Austria, Brazil, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States of America. Report Iceland Universidade de Lisboa: repositório.UL Canada New Zealand Norway Uruguay
institution Open Polar
collection Universidade de Lisboa: repositório.UL
op_collection_id ftunivlisboa
language English
topic Famílias
Parentalidade
spellingShingle Famílias
Parentalidade
Wall, Karin
Leitão, Mafalda
Portugal country note
topic_facet Famílias
Parentalidade
description The international network on leave policies and research has been producing an annual review of leave policies and related research since 2005 (for earlier reviews, go to the network’s website: http://www.leavenetwork.org/archive_2005_2009/annual_reviews/). The review covers Maternity, Paternity and Parental leaves; leave to care for sick children and other employment-related measures to support working parents; and early childhood education and care policy. As well as policies, it provides information on publications and research. The review is based on country notes from each participating country, prepared by members of the network and edited by one of the network’s coordinators. Each country note follows a standard format: details of different types of leave; the relationship between leave policy and early childhood education and care policy; recent policy developments; information on take-up of leave; recent publications and current research projects. The review also includes definitions of the main types of leave policies; and cross-country comparisons. These comparative overviews cover: each main type of leave; total leave available; the relationship between leave and ECEC entitlements; policy changes and developments since the previous review; publications since the previous review; and ongoing research in participating countries The 2015 review includes three new countries: Malta, Mexico and Uruguay. Altogether, it covers 38 countries. In addition to the new countries, these are: Austria, Brazil, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States of America.
format Report
author Wall, Karin
Leitão, Mafalda
author_facet Wall, Karin
Leitão, Mafalda
author_sort Wall, Karin
title Portugal country note
title_short Portugal country note
title_full Portugal country note
title_fullStr Portugal country note
title_full_unstemmed Portugal country note
title_sort portugal country note
publisher The International Network on Leave Policies and Research
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/22763
geographic Canada
New Zealand
Norway
Uruguay
geographic_facet Canada
New Zealand
Norway
Uruguay
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation www.leavenetwork.org/fileadmin/Leavenetwork/Annual_reviews/2015_full_review3_final_8july.pdf
Wall, K. & Leitão, M. (2015). Portugal country note. In P. Moss (Ed.), International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2015, pp. 261-270
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/22763
op_rights openAccess
_version_ 1766041563518992384