Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms

The measurement of mesozooplankton biomass in the ocean requires the use of analytical procedures that\ndestroy the samples. Alternatively, the development of methods to estimate biomass from optical systems and\nappropriate conversion factors could be a compromise between the accuracy of analytical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lehette, Pascal, Hernández-León, Santiago
Other Authors: 35107243800, 6701465678, 4385782, 489706, WOS:Lehette, P, WOS:Hernandez-Leon, S
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Spanish
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10553/2833
id ftunivlaspalmas:oai:accedacris.ulpgc.es:10553/2833
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivlaspalmas:oai:accedacris.ulpgc.es:10553/2833 2023-05-15T13:37:27+02:00 Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms Lehette, Pascal Hernández-León, Santiago 35107243800 6701465678 4385782 489706 WOS:Lehette, P WOS:Hernandez-Leon, S 2009-12-17T13:22:30Z http://hdl.handle.net/10553/2833 spa spa Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 7 1541-5856 http://hdl.handle.net/10553/2833 70350488638 000267010800005 581877 -;1255 Sí info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Limnology and Oceanography: Methods [ISSN 1541-5856], v. 7, p. 304-308 240119 Zoología marina Muestras de laboratorio Métodos ópticos Regiones antárticas Zooplancton marino info:eu-repo/semantics/Article Article 2009 ftunivlaspalmas 2021-05-18T23:10:57Z The measurement of mesozooplankton biomass in the ocean requires the use of analytical procedures that\ndestroy the samples. Alternatively, the development of methods to estimate biomass from optical systems and\nappropriate conversion factors could be a compromise between the accuracy of analytical methods and the need\nto preserve the samples for further taxonomic studies. The conversion of the body area recorded by an optical\ncounter or a camera, by converting the digitized area of an organism into individual biomass, was suggested as\na suitable method to estimate total biomass. In this study, crustacean mesozooplankton from subtropical waters\nwere analyzed, and individual dry weight and body area were compared. The obtained relationships agreed with\nother measurements of biomass obtained from a previous study in Antarctic waters. Gelatinous mesozooplankton\nfrom subtropical and Antarctic waters were also sampled and processed for body area and biomass. As\nexpected, differences between crustacean and gelatinous plankton were highly significant. Transparent gelatinous\norganisms have a lower dry weight per unit area. Therefore, to estimate biomass from digitized images,\npattern recognition discerning, at least, between crustaceans and gelatinous forms is required. 308 304 Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: Acceda Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: Acceda
op_collection_id ftunivlaspalmas
language Spanish
topic 240119 Zoología marina
Muestras de laboratorio
Métodos ópticos
Regiones antárticas
Zooplancton marino
spellingShingle 240119 Zoología marina
Muestras de laboratorio
Métodos ópticos
Regiones antárticas
Zooplancton marino
Lehette, Pascal
Hernández-León, Santiago
Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms
topic_facet 240119 Zoología marina
Muestras de laboratorio
Métodos ópticos
Regiones antárticas
Zooplancton marino
description The measurement of mesozooplankton biomass in the ocean requires the use of analytical procedures that\ndestroy the samples. Alternatively, the development of methods to estimate biomass from optical systems and\nappropriate conversion factors could be a compromise between the accuracy of analytical methods and the need\nto preserve the samples for further taxonomic studies. The conversion of the body area recorded by an optical\ncounter or a camera, by converting the digitized area of an organism into individual biomass, was suggested as\na suitable method to estimate total biomass. In this study, crustacean mesozooplankton from subtropical waters\nwere analyzed, and individual dry weight and body area were compared. The obtained relationships agreed with\nother measurements of biomass obtained from a previous study in Antarctic waters. Gelatinous mesozooplankton\nfrom subtropical and Antarctic waters were also sampled and processed for body area and biomass. As\nexpected, differences between crustacean and gelatinous plankton were highly significant. Transparent gelatinous\norganisms have a lower dry weight per unit area. Therefore, to estimate biomass from digitized images,\npattern recognition discerning, at least, between crustaceans and gelatinous forms is required. 308 304
author2 35107243800
6701465678
4385782
489706
WOS:Lehette, P
WOS:Hernandez-Leon, S
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lehette, Pascal
Hernández-León, Santiago
author_facet Lehette, Pascal
Hernández-León, Santiago
author_sort Lehette, Pascal
title Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms
title_short Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms
title_full Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms
title_fullStr Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms
title_full_unstemmed Zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and Antarctic organisms
title_sort zooplankton biomass estimation from digitized images: a comparison between subtropical and antarctic organisms
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10553/2833
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_source Limnology and Oceanography: Methods [ISSN 1541-5856], v. 7, p. 304-308
op_relation Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
7
1541-5856
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/2833
70350488638
000267010800005
581877
-;1255

op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
_version_ 1766091931318747136