Near-glacier surveying of a subglacial discharge plume: Implications for plume parameterizations

At tidewater glaciers, plume dynamics affect submarine melting, fjord circulation, and the mixing of meltwater. Models often rely on buoyant plume theory to parameterize plumes and submarine melting; however, these parameterizations are largely untested due to a dearth of near‐glacier measurements....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Jackson, Rebecca H., Shroyer, Emily L., Nash, Jonathan D., Sutherland, David A., Carroll, Dustin, Fried, Mason J., Catania, Ginny A., Bartholomaus, Timothy C., Stearns, Leigh A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: American Geophysical Union 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1808/27327
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073602
id ftunivkansas:oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/27327
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivkansas:oai:kuscholarworks.ku.edu:1808/27327 2024-02-11T10:04:01+01:00 Near-glacier surveying of a subglacial discharge plume: Implications for plume parameterizations Jackson, Rebecca H. Shroyer, Emily L. Nash, Jonathan D. Sutherland, David A. Carroll, Dustin Fried, Mason J. Catania, Ginny A. Bartholomaus, Timothy C. Stearns, Leigh A. 2017-06-03 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1808/27327 https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073602 unknown American Geophysical Union http://hdl.handle.net/1808/27327 doi:10.1002/2017GL073602 orcid:0000-0002-3763-8820 orcid:0000-0002-2970-9895 orcid:0000-0002-2843-8608 orcid:0000-0003-1686-5255 orcid:0000-0002-4197-152X orcid:0000-0002-7561-5902 orcid:0000-0002-1470-6720 orcid:0000-0001-7358-7015 © 2017. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. openAccess Article 2017 ftunivkansas https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073602 2024-01-13T23:24:28Z At tidewater glaciers, plume dynamics affect submarine melting, fjord circulation, and the mixing of meltwater. Models often rely on buoyant plume theory to parameterize plumes and submarine melting; however, these parameterizations are largely untested due to a dearth of near‐glacier measurements. Here we present a high‐resolution ocean survey by ship and remotely operated boat near the terminus of Kangerlussuup Sermia in west Greenland. These novel observations reveal the 3‐D structure and transport of a near‐surface plume, originating at a large undercut conduit in the glacier terminus, that is inconsistent with axisymmetric plume theory, the most common representation of plumes in ocean‐glacier models. Instead, the observations suggest a wider upwelling plume—a “truncated” line plume of ∼200 m width—with higher entrainment and plume‐driven melt compared to the typical axisymmetric representation. Our results highlight the importance of a subglacial outlet's geometry in controlling plume dynamics, with implications for parameterizing the exchange flow and submarine melt in glacial fjord models. NNX12AP50G Article in Journal/Newspaper glacier Greenland Tidewater The University of Kansas: KU ScholarWorks Greenland Geophysical Research Letters 44 13 6886 6894
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Kansas: KU ScholarWorks
op_collection_id ftunivkansas
language unknown
description At tidewater glaciers, plume dynamics affect submarine melting, fjord circulation, and the mixing of meltwater. Models often rely on buoyant plume theory to parameterize plumes and submarine melting; however, these parameterizations are largely untested due to a dearth of near‐glacier measurements. Here we present a high‐resolution ocean survey by ship and remotely operated boat near the terminus of Kangerlussuup Sermia in west Greenland. These novel observations reveal the 3‐D structure and transport of a near‐surface plume, originating at a large undercut conduit in the glacier terminus, that is inconsistent with axisymmetric plume theory, the most common representation of plumes in ocean‐glacier models. Instead, the observations suggest a wider upwelling plume—a “truncated” line plume of ∼200 m width—with higher entrainment and plume‐driven melt compared to the typical axisymmetric representation. Our results highlight the importance of a subglacial outlet's geometry in controlling plume dynamics, with implications for parameterizing the exchange flow and submarine melt in glacial fjord models. NNX12AP50G
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jackson, Rebecca H.
Shroyer, Emily L.
Nash, Jonathan D.
Sutherland, David A.
Carroll, Dustin
Fried, Mason J.
Catania, Ginny A.
Bartholomaus, Timothy C.
Stearns, Leigh A.
spellingShingle Jackson, Rebecca H.
Shroyer, Emily L.
Nash, Jonathan D.
Sutherland, David A.
Carroll, Dustin
Fried, Mason J.
Catania, Ginny A.
Bartholomaus, Timothy C.
Stearns, Leigh A.
Near-glacier surveying of a subglacial discharge plume: Implications for plume parameterizations
author_facet Jackson, Rebecca H.
Shroyer, Emily L.
Nash, Jonathan D.
Sutherland, David A.
Carroll, Dustin
Fried, Mason J.
Catania, Ginny A.
Bartholomaus, Timothy C.
Stearns, Leigh A.
author_sort Jackson, Rebecca H.
title Near-glacier surveying of a subglacial discharge plume: Implications for plume parameterizations
title_short Near-glacier surveying of a subglacial discharge plume: Implications for plume parameterizations
title_full Near-glacier surveying of a subglacial discharge plume: Implications for plume parameterizations
title_fullStr Near-glacier surveying of a subglacial discharge plume: Implications for plume parameterizations
title_full_unstemmed Near-glacier surveying of a subglacial discharge plume: Implications for plume parameterizations
title_sort near-glacier surveying of a subglacial discharge plume: implications for plume parameterizations
publisher American Geophysical Union
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/1808/27327
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073602
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre glacier
Greenland
Tidewater
genre_facet glacier
Greenland
Tidewater
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/1808/27327
doi:10.1002/2017GL073602
orcid:0000-0002-3763-8820
orcid:0000-0002-2970-9895
orcid:0000-0002-2843-8608
orcid:0000-0003-1686-5255
orcid:0000-0002-4197-152X
orcid:0000-0002-7561-5902
orcid:0000-0002-1470-6720
orcid:0000-0001-7358-7015
op_rights © 2017. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073602
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 44
container_issue 13
container_start_page 6886
op_container_end_page 6894
_version_ 1790600427855675392