Measuring Glacier Surface Velocities With LiDAR: A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Change Detection Methods

Using airborne and terrestrial LiDAR data from glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica, we compare three change detection methods for accuracy and performance. We focus in particular on one method, Coherent Point Drift (CPD). We find that CPD outperforms Iterative Closest Point (ICP) and Particle Imagi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gadomski, Peter J.
Other Authors: Glennie, Craig L., Hartzell, Preston J., Finnegan, David C.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10657/5416
id ftunivhouston:oai:uh-ir.tdl.org:10657/5416
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivhouston:oai:uh-ir.tdl.org:10657/5416 2023-05-15T13:46:38+02:00 Measuring Glacier Surface Velocities With LiDAR: A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Change Detection Methods Gadomski, Peter J. Glennie, Craig L. Hartzell, Preston J. Finnegan, David C. December 2016 application/pdf born digital https://hdl.handle.net/10657/5416 en eng https://hdl.handle.net/10657/5416 The author of this work is the copyright owner. UH Libraries and the Texas Digital Library have their permission to store and provide access to this work. Further transmission, reproduction, or presentation of this work is prohibited except with permission of the author(s). LiDAR Glaciers Change-detection Coherent Point Drift Iterative Closest Point Particle image velocimetry Helehim Glacier Canada Glacier Glacier velocity Thesis Text 2016 ftunivhouston 2022-04-03T15:47:36Z Using airborne and terrestrial LiDAR data from glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica, we compare three change detection methods for accuracy and performance. We focus in particular on one method, Coherent Point Drift (CPD). We find that CPD outperforms Iterative Closest Point (ICP) and Particle Imaging Velocimetry (PIV) when used on a terrestrial LiDAR dataset at the Helheim Glacier in southeast Greenland. At one representative location, CPD calculated an average glacier velocity of 20.11 m d−1 with Root-Mean Squared Error of 2.5 m d−1 when compared to a GNSS-derived measurement of 20.44md−1. All three change detection methods fail to fully capture the motion of the Canada Glacier in Antarctica, but do detect change in the fast-moving and crevassed portion of the glacier. We conclude that these change detection methods, and CPD in particular, are useful tools for measuring glacier velocity when the data have sufficient identifiable features in both epochs. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Department of Thesis Antarc* Antarctica Canada Glacier glacier glacier* Greenland University of Houston Institutional Repository (UHIR) Canada Canada Glacier ENVELOPE(162.983,162.983,-77.617,-77.617) Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection University of Houston Institutional Repository (UHIR)
op_collection_id ftunivhouston
language English
topic LiDAR
Glaciers
Change-detection
Coherent Point Drift
Iterative Closest Point
Particle image velocimetry
Helehim Glacier
Canada Glacier
Glacier velocity
spellingShingle LiDAR
Glaciers
Change-detection
Coherent Point Drift
Iterative Closest Point
Particle image velocimetry
Helehim Glacier
Canada Glacier
Glacier velocity
Gadomski, Peter J.
Measuring Glacier Surface Velocities With LiDAR: A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Change Detection Methods
topic_facet LiDAR
Glaciers
Change-detection
Coherent Point Drift
Iterative Closest Point
Particle image velocimetry
Helehim Glacier
Canada Glacier
Glacier velocity
description Using airborne and terrestrial LiDAR data from glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica, we compare three change detection methods for accuracy and performance. We focus in particular on one method, Coherent Point Drift (CPD). We find that CPD outperforms Iterative Closest Point (ICP) and Particle Imaging Velocimetry (PIV) when used on a terrestrial LiDAR dataset at the Helheim Glacier in southeast Greenland. At one representative location, CPD calculated an average glacier velocity of 20.11 m d−1 with Root-Mean Squared Error of 2.5 m d−1 when compared to a GNSS-derived measurement of 20.44md−1. All three change detection methods fail to fully capture the motion of the Canada Glacier in Antarctica, but do detect change in the fast-moving and crevassed portion of the glacier. We conclude that these change detection methods, and CPD in particular, are useful tools for measuring glacier velocity when the data have sufficient identifiable features in both epochs. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Department of
author2 Glennie, Craig L.
Hartzell, Preston J.
Finnegan, David C.
format Thesis
author Gadomski, Peter J.
author_facet Gadomski, Peter J.
author_sort Gadomski, Peter J.
title Measuring Glacier Surface Velocities With LiDAR: A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Change Detection Methods
title_short Measuring Glacier Surface Velocities With LiDAR: A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Change Detection Methods
title_full Measuring Glacier Surface Velocities With LiDAR: A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Change Detection Methods
title_fullStr Measuring Glacier Surface Velocities With LiDAR: A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Change Detection Methods
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Glacier Surface Velocities With LiDAR: A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Change Detection Methods
title_sort measuring glacier surface velocities with lidar: a comparison of three-dimensional change detection methods
publishDate 2016
url https://hdl.handle.net/10657/5416
long_lat ENVELOPE(162.983,162.983,-77.617,-77.617)
geographic Canada
Canada Glacier
Greenland
geographic_facet Canada
Canada Glacier
Greenland
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Canada Glacier
glacier
glacier*
Greenland
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Canada Glacier
glacier
glacier*
Greenland
op_relation https://hdl.handle.net/10657/5416
op_rights The author of this work is the copyright owner. UH Libraries and the Texas Digital Library have their permission to store and provide access to this work. Further transmission, reproduction, or presentation of this work is prohibited except with permission of the author(s).
_version_ 1766244772699176960