The Year of Polar Prediction site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation

Although the quality of weather forecasts in the polar regions is improving, forecast skill there still lags behind lower latitudes. So far there have been relatively few efforts to evaluate processes in numerical weather prediction systems using in situ and remote sensing datasets from meteorologic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Day, Jonathan J., Svensson, Gunilla, Casati, Barbara, Uttal, Taneil, Khalsa, Siri-Jodha, Bazile, Eric, Akish, Elena, Azouz, Niramson, Ferrighi, Lara, Frank, Helmut, Gallagher, Michael, Godøy, Øystein, Hartten, Leslie M., Huang, Laura X., Holt, Jareth, Di Stefano, Massimo, Suomi, Irene, Mariani, Zen, Morris, Sara, O'Connor, Ewan, Pirazzini, Roberta, Remes, Teresa, Fadeev, Rostislav, Solomon, Amy, Tjernström, Johanna, Tolstykh, Mikhail
Other Authors: Ilmatieteen laitos, Finnish Meteorological Institute, orcid:0000-0002-2523-3252, orcid:0000-0001-9834-5100, orcid:0000-0003-3215-4592
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10138/585380
id ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/585380
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/585380 2024-10-06T13:43:21+00:00 The Year of Polar Prediction site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation Day, Jonathan J. Svensson, Gunilla Casati, Barbara Uttal, Taneil Khalsa, Siri-Jodha Bazile, Eric Akish, Elena Azouz, Niramson Ferrighi, Lara Frank, Helmut Gallagher, Michael Godøy, Øystein Hartten, Leslie M. Huang, Laura X. Holt, Jareth Di Stefano, Massimo Suomi, Irene Mariani, Zen Morris, Sara O'Connor, Ewan Pirazzini, Roberta Remes, Teresa Fadeev, Rostislav Solomon, Amy Tjernström, Johanna Tolstykh, Mikhail Ilmatieteen laitos Finnish Meteorological Institute orcid:0000-0002-2523-3252 orcid:0000-0001-9834-5100 orcid:0000-0003-3215-4592 2024-09-05T13:25:01Z 5511-5543 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10138/585380 en eng Copernicus Publications Geoscientific model development 10.5194/gmd-17-5511-2024 1991-959X 1991-9603 14 17 105374 http://hdl.handle.net/10138/585380 URN:NBN:fi-fe2024090569509 CC BY 4.0 polar regions weather forecasting forecasts arctic region temperature remote sensing evaluation climate atmosphere (earth) meteorology napa-alueet sääennustus ennusteet arktinen alue lämpötila kaukokartoitus arviointi ilmasto ilmakehä meteorologia A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä A1 Journal article (refereed), original research publishedVersion 2024 ftunivhelsihelda 2024-09-12T00:19:02Z Although the quality of weather forecasts in the polar regions is improving, forecast skill there still lags behind lower latitudes. So far there have been relatively few efforts to evaluate processes in numerical weather prediction systems using in situ and remote sensing datasets from meteorological observatories in the terrestrial Arctic and Antarctic compared to the mid-latitudes. Progress has been limited both by the heterogeneous nature of observatory and forecast data and by limited availability of the parameters needed to perform process-oriented evaluation in multi-model forecast archives. The Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP) site Model Inter-comparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) is addressing this gap by producing merged observatory data files (MODFs) and merged model data files (MMDFs), bringing together observations and forecast data at polar meteorological observatories in a format designed to facilitate process-oriented evaluation. An evaluation of forecast performance was performed at seven Arctic sites, focussing on the first YOPP Special Observing Period in the Northern Hemisphere (NH-SOP1) in February and March 2018. It demonstrated that although the characteristics of forecast skill vary between the different sites and systems, an underestimation in boundary layer temperature variability across models, which goes hand in hand with an inability to capture cold extremes, is a common issue at several sites. It is found that many models tend to underestimate the sensitivity of the 2 m air temperature (T2m) and the surface skin temperature to variations in radiative forcing, and the reasons for this are discussed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Arktinen alue HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository Antarctic Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository
op_collection_id ftunivhelsihelda
language English
topic polar regions
weather forecasting
forecasts
arctic region
temperature
remote sensing
evaluation
climate
atmosphere (earth)
meteorology
napa-alueet
sääennustus
ennusteet
arktinen alue
lämpötila
kaukokartoitus
arviointi
ilmasto
ilmakehä
meteorologia
spellingShingle polar regions
weather forecasting
forecasts
arctic region
temperature
remote sensing
evaluation
climate
atmosphere (earth)
meteorology
napa-alueet
sääennustus
ennusteet
arktinen alue
lämpötila
kaukokartoitus
arviointi
ilmasto
ilmakehä
meteorologia
Day, Jonathan J.
Svensson, Gunilla
Casati, Barbara
Uttal, Taneil
Khalsa, Siri-Jodha
Bazile, Eric
Akish, Elena
Azouz, Niramson
Ferrighi, Lara
Frank, Helmut
Gallagher, Michael
Godøy, Øystein
Hartten, Leslie M.
Huang, Laura X.
Holt, Jareth
Di Stefano, Massimo
Suomi, Irene
Mariani, Zen
Morris, Sara
O'Connor, Ewan
Pirazzini, Roberta
Remes, Teresa
Fadeev, Rostislav
Solomon, Amy
Tjernström, Johanna
Tolstykh, Mikhail
The Year of Polar Prediction site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation
topic_facet polar regions
weather forecasting
forecasts
arctic region
temperature
remote sensing
evaluation
climate
atmosphere (earth)
meteorology
napa-alueet
sääennustus
ennusteet
arktinen alue
lämpötila
kaukokartoitus
arviointi
ilmasto
ilmakehä
meteorologia
description Although the quality of weather forecasts in the polar regions is improving, forecast skill there still lags behind lower latitudes. So far there have been relatively few efforts to evaluate processes in numerical weather prediction systems using in situ and remote sensing datasets from meteorological observatories in the terrestrial Arctic and Antarctic compared to the mid-latitudes. Progress has been limited both by the heterogeneous nature of observatory and forecast data and by limited availability of the parameters needed to perform process-oriented evaluation in multi-model forecast archives. The Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP) site Model Inter-comparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) is addressing this gap by producing merged observatory data files (MODFs) and merged model data files (MMDFs), bringing together observations and forecast data at polar meteorological observatories in a format designed to facilitate process-oriented evaluation. An evaluation of forecast performance was performed at seven Arctic sites, focussing on the first YOPP Special Observing Period in the Northern Hemisphere (NH-SOP1) in February and March 2018. It demonstrated that although the characteristics of forecast skill vary between the different sites and systems, an underestimation in boundary layer temperature variability across models, which goes hand in hand with an inability to capture cold extremes, is a common issue at several sites. It is found that many models tend to underestimate the sensitivity of the 2 m air temperature (T2m) and the surface skin temperature to variations in radiative forcing, and the reasons for this are discussed.
author2 Ilmatieteen laitos
Finnish Meteorological Institute
orcid:0000-0002-2523-3252
orcid:0000-0001-9834-5100
orcid:0000-0003-3215-4592
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Day, Jonathan J.
Svensson, Gunilla
Casati, Barbara
Uttal, Taneil
Khalsa, Siri-Jodha
Bazile, Eric
Akish, Elena
Azouz, Niramson
Ferrighi, Lara
Frank, Helmut
Gallagher, Michael
Godøy, Øystein
Hartten, Leslie M.
Huang, Laura X.
Holt, Jareth
Di Stefano, Massimo
Suomi, Irene
Mariani, Zen
Morris, Sara
O'Connor, Ewan
Pirazzini, Roberta
Remes, Teresa
Fadeev, Rostislav
Solomon, Amy
Tjernström, Johanna
Tolstykh, Mikhail
author_facet Day, Jonathan J.
Svensson, Gunilla
Casati, Barbara
Uttal, Taneil
Khalsa, Siri-Jodha
Bazile, Eric
Akish, Elena
Azouz, Niramson
Ferrighi, Lara
Frank, Helmut
Gallagher, Michael
Godøy, Øystein
Hartten, Leslie M.
Huang, Laura X.
Holt, Jareth
Di Stefano, Massimo
Suomi, Irene
Mariani, Zen
Morris, Sara
O'Connor, Ewan
Pirazzini, Roberta
Remes, Teresa
Fadeev, Rostislav
Solomon, Amy
Tjernström, Johanna
Tolstykh, Mikhail
author_sort Day, Jonathan J.
title The Year of Polar Prediction site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation
title_short The Year of Polar Prediction site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation
title_full The Year of Polar Prediction site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation
title_fullStr The Year of Polar Prediction site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The Year of Polar Prediction site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation
title_sort year of polar prediction site model intercomparison project (yoppsitemip) phase 1: project overview and arctic winter forecast evaluation
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2024
url http://hdl.handle.net/10138/585380
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Arktinen alue
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Arktinen alue
op_relation Geoscientific model development
10.5194/gmd-17-5511-2024
1991-959X
1991-9603
14
17
105374
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/585380
URN:NBN:fi-fe2024090569509
op_rights CC BY 4.0
_version_ 1812180317422747648