Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method

Ozone fluxes were measured over a forest in southern Finland between August 2001 and July 2002 using the eddy covariance method. Systematic errors due to the imperfect frequency response of the instrumentation and random errors due to the stochastic nature of turbulence were estimated. Flux underest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keronen, P., Reissell, A., Rannik, Ü., Pohja, T., Siivola, E., Hiltunen, V., Hari, P., Kulmala, M., Vesala, T.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578216
_version_ 1821873845639839744
author Keronen, P.
Reissell, A.
Rannik, Ü.
Pohja, T.
Siivola, E.
Hiltunen, V.
Hari, P.
Kulmala, M.
Vesala, T.
author_facet Keronen, P.
Reissell, A.
Rannik, Ü.
Pohja, T.
Siivola, E.
Hiltunen, V.
Hari, P.
Kulmala, M.
Vesala, T.
author_sort Keronen, P.
collection HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository
description Ozone fluxes were measured over a forest in southern Finland between August 2001 and July 2002 using the eddy covariance method. Systematic errors due to the imperfect frequency response of the instrumentation and random errors due to the stochastic nature of turbulence were estimated. Flux underestimation correction factors for unstable stratification were 1.03–1.19. Random errors of the flux estimates were most frequently about 20% of the flux value. Fluxes were highest during the summer, declining to near zero during the winter. In summer, fluxes were higher during daytime than at night coinciding with higher turbulence and higher rate of stomatal uptake. Maximum summertime deposition velocities were 6–7 mm s–1. During winter, the diurnal pattern in ozone flux was weak and the deposition velocity was 0.5–1.5 mm s–1. Comparison between eddy covariance and profile flux measurement results generally showed good agreement during daytime.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Boreal Environment Research
genre_facet Boreal Environment Research
id ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/578216
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivhelsihelda
op_relation Boreal Environment Research
1239-6095
1797-2469
4
8
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578216
Suomen ympäristökeskus
op_rights CC BY 4.0
openAccess
publishDate 2024
publisher Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/578216 2025-01-16T21:20:06+00:00 Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method Keronen, P. Reissell, A. Rannik, Ü. Pohja, T. Siivola, E. Hiltunen, V. Hari, P. Kulmala, M. Vesala, T. 2024-06-27T13:44:49Z 425-443 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578216 eng eng Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board Boreal Environment Research 1239-6095 1797-2469 4 8 http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578216 Suomen ympäristökeskus CC BY 4.0 openAccess Artikkeli lehdessä 2024 ftunivhelsihelda 2024-08-21T23:48:04Z Ozone fluxes were measured over a forest in southern Finland between August 2001 and July 2002 using the eddy covariance method. Systematic errors due to the imperfect frequency response of the instrumentation and random errors due to the stochastic nature of turbulence were estimated. Flux underestimation correction factors for unstable stratification were 1.03–1.19. Random errors of the flux estimates were most frequently about 20% of the flux value. Fluxes were highest during the summer, declining to near zero during the winter. In summer, fluxes were higher during daytime than at night coinciding with higher turbulence and higher rate of stomatal uptake. Maximum summertime deposition velocities were 6–7 mm s–1. During winter, the diurnal pattern in ozone flux was weak and the deposition velocity was 0.5–1.5 mm s–1. Comparison between eddy covariance and profile flux measurement results generally showed good agreement during daytime. Article in Journal/Newspaper Boreal Environment Research HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository
spellingShingle Keronen, P.
Reissell, A.
Rannik, Ü.
Pohja, T.
Siivola, E.
Hiltunen, V.
Hari, P.
Kulmala, M.
Vesala, T.
Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method
title Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method
title_full Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method
title_fullStr Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method
title_full_unstemmed Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method
title_short Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method
title_sort ozone flux measurements over a scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method
url http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578216