Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method
Ozone fluxes were measured over a forest in southern Finland between August 2001 and July 2002 using the eddy covariance method. Systematic errors due to the imperfect frequency response of the instrumentation and random errors due to the stochastic nature of turbulence were estimated. Flux underest...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578216 |
_version_ | 1821873845639839744 |
---|---|
author | Keronen, P. Reissell, A. Rannik, Ü. Pohja, T. Siivola, E. Hiltunen, V. Hari, P. Kulmala, M. Vesala, T. |
author_facet | Keronen, P. Reissell, A. Rannik, Ü. Pohja, T. Siivola, E. Hiltunen, V. Hari, P. Kulmala, M. Vesala, T. |
author_sort | Keronen, P. |
collection | HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository |
description | Ozone fluxes were measured over a forest in southern Finland between August 2001 and July 2002 using the eddy covariance method. Systematic errors due to the imperfect frequency response of the instrumentation and random errors due to the stochastic nature of turbulence were estimated. Flux underestimation correction factors for unstable stratification were 1.03–1.19. Random errors of the flux estimates were most frequently about 20% of the flux value. Fluxes were highest during the summer, declining to near zero during the winter. In summer, fluxes were higher during daytime than at night coinciding with higher turbulence and higher rate of stomatal uptake. Maximum summertime deposition velocities were 6–7 mm s–1. During winter, the diurnal pattern in ozone flux was weak and the deposition velocity was 0.5–1.5 mm s–1. Comparison between eddy covariance and profile flux measurement results generally showed good agreement during daytime. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Boreal Environment Research |
genre_facet | Boreal Environment Research |
id | ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/578216 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftunivhelsihelda |
op_relation | Boreal Environment Research 1239-6095 1797-2469 4 8 http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578216 Suomen ympäristökeskus |
op_rights | CC BY 4.0 openAccess |
publishDate | 2024 |
publisher | Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/578216 2025-01-16T21:20:06+00:00 Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method Keronen, P. Reissell, A. Rannik, Ü. Pohja, T. Siivola, E. Hiltunen, V. Hari, P. Kulmala, M. Vesala, T. 2024-06-27T13:44:49Z 425-443 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578216 eng eng Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board Boreal Environment Research 1239-6095 1797-2469 4 8 http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578216 Suomen ympäristökeskus CC BY 4.0 openAccess Artikkeli lehdessä 2024 ftunivhelsihelda 2024-08-21T23:48:04Z Ozone fluxes were measured over a forest in southern Finland between August 2001 and July 2002 using the eddy covariance method. Systematic errors due to the imperfect frequency response of the instrumentation and random errors due to the stochastic nature of turbulence were estimated. Flux underestimation correction factors for unstable stratification were 1.03–1.19. Random errors of the flux estimates were most frequently about 20% of the flux value. Fluxes were highest during the summer, declining to near zero during the winter. In summer, fluxes were higher during daytime than at night coinciding with higher turbulence and higher rate of stomatal uptake. Maximum summertime deposition velocities were 6–7 mm s–1. During winter, the diurnal pattern in ozone flux was weak and the deposition velocity was 0.5–1.5 mm s–1. Comparison between eddy covariance and profile flux measurement results generally showed good agreement during daytime. Article in Journal/Newspaper Boreal Environment Research HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository |
spellingShingle | Keronen, P. Reissell, A. Rannik, Ü. Pohja, T. Siivola, E. Hiltunen, V. Hari, P. Kulmala, M. Vesala, T. Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method |
title | Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method |
title_full | Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method |
title_fullStr | Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method |
title_full_unstemmed | Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method |
title_short | Ozone flux measurements over a Scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method |
title_sort | ozone flux measurements over a scots pine forest using eddy covariance method: performance evaluation and comparison with flux-profile method |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578216 |