Differences in forest structure and landscape patterns between ownership groups in Central Finland

The spatial distribution and connectivity of forest characteristics, such as soil productivity, stage of forest development, forest tree species composition and forest vertical structure, were studied according to forest ownership groups in Central Finland. The study was based on the data from the F...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uuttera, J., Maltamo, M., Kurki, S., Mykrä, S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578018
id ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/578018
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/578018 2024-09-15T18:00:10+00:00 Differences in forest structure and landscape patterns between ownership groups in Central Finland Uuttera, J. Maltamo, M. Kurki, S. Mykrä, S. 2024-06-27T13:44:31Z 191-200 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578018 eng eng Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board Boreal Environment Research 1239-6095 1797-2469 2 3 http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578018 Suomen ympäristökeskus CC BY 4.0 openAccess Artikkeli lehdessä 2024 ftunivhelsihelda 2024-08-21T23:48:04Z The spatial distribution and connectivity of forest characteristics, such as soil productivity, stage of forest development, forest tree species composition and forest vertical structure, were studied according to forest ownership groups in Central Finland. The study was based on the data from the Finnish National Forest Inventory. The spatial distribution was examined by estimating variograms for compared characteristics. Connectivity of forest characteristics was estimated along the inventory track by calculating the proportions of adjacent sample plots which had the same value of the forest characteristic in question. Results on the spatial distribution and connectivity of dominating tree species, tree species composition and vertical structure of the stand show that differences in stand management have also affected the structure of forest landscape. It seems that the within-stand heterogeneity, required by many forest species, is better maintained in privately owned forests due to more heterogeneous management regimes. This leads to greater spatial correlation and connectivity of the stand structure characteristics. On the other hand, small management units in privately owned forest holdings lead to a more fragmented forest landscape. This is partly avoided in forests owned by the state or forest industrial companies, which have more continuous patches of a single successional stage of forest. However, this can be regarded only as a potential for the preservation of viable forest species populations in the future, because currently successional stages of young forest have the greatest spatial correlation and connectivity. Article in Journal/Newspaper Boreal Environment Research HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository
institution Open Polar
collection HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository
op_collection_id ftunivhelsihelda
language English
description The spatial distribution and connectivity of forest characteristics, such as soil productivity, stage of forest development, forest tree species composition and forest vertical structure, were studied according to forest ownership groups in Central Finland. The study was based on the data from the Finnish National Forest Inventory. The spatial distribution was examined by estimating variograms for compared characteristics. Connectivity of forest characteristics was estimated along the inventory track by calculating the proportions of adjacent sample plots which had the same value of the forest characteristic in question. Results on the spatial distribution and connectivity of dominating tree species, tree species composition and vertical structure of the stand show that differences in stand management have also affected the structure of forest landscape. It seems that the within-stand heterogeneity, required by many forest species, is better maintained in privately owned forests due to more heterogeneous management regimes. This leads to greater spatial correlation and connectivity of the stand structure characteristics. On the other hand, small management units in privately owned forest holdings lead to a more fragmented forest landscape. This is partly avoided in forests owned by the state or forest industrial companies, which have more continuous patches of a single successional stage of forest. However, this can be regarded only as a potential for the preservation of viable forest species populations in the future, because currently successional stages of young forest have the greatest spatial correlation and connectivity.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Uuttera, J.
Maltamo, M.
Kurki, S.
Mykrä, S.
spellingShingle Uuttera, J.
Maltamo, M.
Kurki, S.
Mykrä, S.
Differences in forest structure and landscape patterns between ownership groups in Central Finland
author_facet Uuttera, J.
Maltamo, M.
Kurki, S.
Mykrä, S.
author_sort Uuttera, J.
title Differences in forest structure and landscape patterns between ownership groups in Central Finland
title_short Differences in forest structure and landscape patterns between ownership groups in Central Finland
title_full Differences in forest structure and landscape patterns between ownership groups in Central Finland
title_fullStr Differences in forest structure and landscape patterns between ownership groups in Central Finland
title_full_unstemmed Differences in forest structure and landscape patterns between ownership groups in Central Finland
title_sort differences in forest structure and landscape patterns between ownership groups in central finland
publisher Boreal Environment Research Publishing Board
publishDate 2024
url http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578018
genre Boreal Environment Research
genre_facet Boreal Environment Research
op_relation Boreal Environment Research
1239-6095
1797-2469
2
3
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/578018
Suomen ympäristökeskus
op_rights CC BY 4.0
openAccess
_version_ 1810437301233254400