Phenology of Photosynthesis in Winter-Dormant Temperate and Boreal Forests : Long-Term Observations From Flux Towers and Quantitative Evaluation of Phenology Models

We examined the seasonality of photosynthesis in 46 evergreen needleleaf (evergreen needleleaf forests (ENF)) and deciduous broadleaf (deciduous broadleaf forests (DBF)) forests across North America and Eurasia. We quantified the onset and end (StartGPP and EndGPP) of photosynthesis in spring and au...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bowling, David R., Schädel, Christina, Smith, Kenneth R., Richardson, Andrew D., Bahn, Michael, Arain, M. Altaf, Varlagin, Andrej, Ouimette, Andrew P., Frank, John M., Barr, Alan G., Mammarella, Ivan, Šigut, Ladislav, Foord, Vanessa, Burns, Sean P., Montagnani, Leonardo, Litvak, Marcy E., Munger, J. William, Ikawa, Hiroki, Hollinger, David Y., Blanken, Peter D., Ueyama, Masahito, Matteucci, Giorgio, Bernhofer, Christian, Bohrer, Gil, Iwata, Hiroki, Ibrom, Andreas, Pilegaard, Kim, Spittlehouse, David L., Kobayashi, Hideki, Desai, Ankur R., Staebler, Ralf M., Black, T. Andrew
Other Authors: Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), Micrometeorology and biogeochemical cycles
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10138/576351
id ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/576351
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository
op_collection_id ftunivhelsihelda
language English
topic forest
gross primary productivity
phenology
photosynthesis
snowpack
spring
Physical sciences
spellingShingle forest
gross primary productivity
phenology
photosynthesis
snowpack
spring
Physical sciences
Bowling, David R.
Schädel, Christina
Smith, Kenneth R.
Richardson, Andrew D.
Bahn, Michael
Arain, M. Altaf
Varlagin, Andrej
Ouimette, Andrew P.
Frank, John M.
Barr, Alan G.
Mammarella, Ivan
Šigut, Ladislav
Foord, Vanessa
Burns, Sean P.
Montagnani, Leonardo
Litvak, Marcy E.
Munger, J. William
Ikawa, Hiroki
Hollinger, David Y.
Blanken, Peter D.
Ueyama, Masahito
Matteucci, Giorgio
Bernhofer, Christian
Bohrer, Gil
Iwata, Hiroki
Ibrom, Andreas
Pilegaard, Kim
Spittlehouse, David L.
Kobayashi, Hideki
Desai, Ankur R.
Staebler, Ralf M.
Black, T. Andrew
Phenology of Photosynthesis in Winter-Dormant Temperate and Boreal Forests : Long-Term Observations From Flux Towers and Quantitative Evaluation of Phenology Models
topic_facet forest
gross primary productivity
phenology
photosynthesis
snowpack
spring
Physical sciences
description We examined the seasonality of photosynthesis in 46 evergreen needleleaf (evergreen needleleaf forests (ENF)) and deciduous broadleaf (deciduous broadleaf forests (DBF)) forests across North America and Eurasia. We quantified the onset and end (StartGPP and EndGPP) of photosynthesis in spring and autumn based on the response of net ecosystem exchange of CO2 to sunlight. To test the hypothesis that snowmelt is required for photosynthesis to begin, these were compared with end of snowmelt derived from soil temperature. ENF forests achieved 10% of summer photosynthetic capacity ∼3 weeks before end of snowmelt, while DBF forests achieved that capacity ∼4 weeks afterward. DBF forests increased photosynthetic capacity in spring faster (1.95% d−1) than ENF (1.10% d−1), and their active season length (EndGPP–StartGPP) was ∼50 days shorter. We hypothesized that warming has influenced timing of the photosynthesis season. We found minimal evidence for long-term change in StartGPP, EndGPP, or air temperature, but their interannual anomalies were significantly correlated. Warmer weather was associated with earlier StartGPP (1.3–2.5 days °C−1) or later EndGPP (1.5–1.8 days °C−1, depending on forest type and month). Finally, we tested whether existing phenological models could predict StartGPP and EndGPP. For ENF forests, air temperature- and daylength-based models provided best predictions for StartGPP, while a chilling-degree-day model was best for EndGPP. The root mean square errors (RMSE) between predicted and observed StartGPP and EndGPP were 11.7 and 11.3 days, respectively. For DBF forests, temperature- and daylength-based models yielded the best results (RMSE 6.3 and 10.5 days). Peer reviewed
author2 Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR)
Micrometeorology and biogeochemical cycles
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bowling, David R.
Schädel, Christina
Smith, Kenneth R.
Richardson, Andrew D.
Bahn, Michael
Arain, M. Altaf
Varlagin, Andrej
Ouimette, Andrew P.
Frank, John M.
Barr, Alan G.
Mammarella, Ivan
Šigut, Ladislav
Foord, Vanessa
Burns, Sean P.
Montagnani, Leonardo
Litvak, Marcy E.
Munger, J. William
Ikawa, Hiroki
Hollinger, David Y.
Blanken, Peter D.
Ueyama, Masahito
Matteucci, Giorgio
Bernhofer, Christian
Bohrer, Gil
Iwata, Hiroki
Ibrom, Andreas
Pilegaard, Kim
Spittlehouse, David L.
Kobayashi, Hideki
Desai, Ankur R.
Staebler, Ralf M.
Black, T. Andrew
author_facet Bowling, David R.
Schädel, Christina
Smith, Kenneth R.
Richardson, Andrew D.
Bahn, Michael
Arain, M. Altaf
Varlagin, Andrej
Ouimette, Andrew P.
Frank, John M.
Barr, Alan G.
Mammarella, Ivan
Šigut, Ladislav
Foord, Vanessa
Burns, Sean P.
Montagnani, Leonardo
Litvak, Marcy E.
Munger, J. William
Ikawa, Hiroki
Hollinger, David Y.
Blanken, Peter D.
Ueyama, Masahito
Matteucci, Giorgio
Bernhofer, Christian
Bohrer, Gil
Iwata, Hiroki
Ibrom, Andreas
Pilegaard, Kim
Spittlehouse, David L.
Kobayashi, Hideki
Desai, Ankur R.
Staebler, Ralf M.
Black, T. Andrew
author_sort Bowling, David R.
title Phenology of Photosynthesis in Winter-Dormant Temperate and Boreal Forests : Long-Term Observations From Flux Towers and Quantitative Evaluation of Phenology Models
title_short Phenology of Photosynthesis in Winter-Dormant Temperate and Boreal Forests : Long-Term Observations From Flux Towers and Quantitative Evaluation of Phenology Models
title_full Phenology of Photosynthesis in Winter-Dormant Temperate and Boreal Forests : Long-Term Observations From Flux Towers and Quantitative Evaluation of Phenology Models
title_fullStr Phenology of Photosynthesis in Winter-Dormant Temperate and Boreal Forests : Long-Term Observations From Flux Towers and Quantitative Evaluation of Phenology Models
title_full_unstemmed Phenology of Photosynthesis in Winter-Dormant Temperate and Boreal Forests : Long-Term Observations From Flux Towers and Quantitative Evaluation of Phenology Models
title_sort phenology of photosynthesis in winter-dormant temperate and boreal forests : long-term observations from flux towers and quantitative evaluation of phenology models
publisher American Geophysical Union
publishDate 2024
url http://hdl.handle.net/10138/576351
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation 10.1029/2023JG007839
Thanks to the worldwide flux tower community for collecting, processing, innovating, and curating data access for all. Special thanks to a few valued colleagues who were not able to collaborate due to government restrictions. We are also grateful to the USDA NRCS Snow Survey Program for sharing data. This research was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation Macrosystems Biology and NEON-Enabled Science (awards 1926090 and 1702697), Division of Environmental Biology programs (award 1929709), and Long-Term Ecological Research Program (1832210) grants. Some computational analyses were run on Northern Arizona University's Monsoon computing cluster, funded by Arizona's Technology and Research Initiative Fund. Additional funding for ongoing data collection was provided by: the U.S. Dept. of Energy AmeriFlux Network Management Project support to ChEAS, UMBS, and US-NR1 core site, the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service, the Arctic Challenge for Sustainability II (JPMXD1420318865, Japan), the European Commission eLTER H2020 (GA 654359) and eLTER PLUS (GA 871128), the Italian Integrated Environmental Research Infrastructures Systems (ITINERIS, IR0000032), Forest Services of Autonomous Province of Bolzano, ICOS Denmark, LTER Denmark, ICOS-Finland, Academy of Finland, EU Horizon-Europe project GreenFeedback (Grant 10105692), Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic within the National Infrastructure for Carbon Observations\u2013CzeCOS (No. LM2023048), and the Russian Science Foundation (project 21-14-00209).
Bowling , D R , Schädel , C , Smith , K R , Richardson , A D , Bahn , M , Arain , M A , Varlagin , A , Ouimette , A P , Frank , J M , Barr , A G , Mammarella , I , Šigut , L , Foord , V , Burns , S P , Montagnani , L , Litvak , M E , Munger , J W , Ikawa , H , Hollinger , D Y , Blanken , P D , Ueyama , M , Matteucci , G , Bernhofer , C , Bohrer , G , Iwata , H , Ibrom , A , Pilegaard , K , Spittlehouse , D L , Kobayashi , H , Desai , A R , Staebler , R M & Black , T A 2024 , ' Phenology of Photosynthesis in Winter-Dormant Temperate and Boreal Forests : Long-Term Observations From Flux Towers and Quantitative Evaluation of Phenology Models ' , Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences , vol. 129 , no. 5 , e2023JG007839 . https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007839
ORCID: /0000-0002-8516-3356/work/160781061
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/576351
850c3887-eecb-4b1d-8158-f573c59e4a50
85191734712
001208690000001
op_rights cc_by_nc_nd
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
openAccess
_version_ 1802639151949938688
spelling ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/576351 2024-06-23T07:48:49+00:00 Phenology of Photosynthesis in Winter-Dormant Temperate and Boreal Forests : Long-Term Observations From Flux Towers and Quantitative Evaluation of Phenology Models Bowling, David R. Schädel, Christina Smith, Kenneth R. Richardson, Andrew D. Bahn, Michael Arain, M. Altaf Varlagin, Andrej Ouimette, Andrew P. Frank, John M. Barr, Alan G. Mammarella, Ivan Šigut, Ladislav Foord, Vanessa Burns, Sean P. Montagnani, Leonardo Litvak, Marcy E. Munger, J. William Ikawa, Hiroki Hollinger, David Y. Blanken, Peter D. Ueyama, Masahito Matteucci, Giorgio Bernhofer, Christian Bohrer, Gil Iwata, Hiroki Ibrom, Andreas Pilegaard, Kim Spittlehouse, David L. Kobayashi, Hideki Desai, Ankur R. Staebler, Ralf M. Black, T. Andrew Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) Micrometeorology and biogeochemical cycles 2024-05-30T13:21:04Z 25 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10138/576351 eng eng American Geophysical Union 10.1029/2023JG007839 Thanks to the worldwide flux tower community for collecting, processing, innovating, and curating data access for all. Special thanks to a few valued colleagues who were not able to collaborate due to government restrictions. We are also grateful to the USDA NRCS Snow Survey Program for sharing data. This research was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation Macrosystems Biology and NEON-Enabled Science (awards 1926090 and 1702697), Division of Environmental Biology programs (award 1929709), and Long-Term Ecological Research Program (1832210) grants. Some computational analyses were run on Northern Arizona University's Monsoon computing cluster, funded by Arizona's Technology and Research Initiative Fund. Additional funding for ongoing data collection was provided by: the U.S. Dept. of Energy AmeriFlux Network Management Project support to ChEAS, UMBS, and US-NR1 core site, the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service, the Arctic Challenge for Sustainability II (JPMXD1420318865, Japan), the European Commission eLTER H2020 (GA 654359) and eLTER PLUS (GA 871128), the Italian Integrated Environmental Research Infrastructures Systems (ITINERIS, IR0000032), Forest Services of Autonomous Province of Bolzano, ICOS Denmark, LTER Denmark, ICOS-Finland, Academy of Finland, EU Horizon-Europe project GreenFeedback (Grant 10105692), Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic within the National Infrastructure for Carbon Observations\u2013CzeCOS (No. LM2023048), and the Russian Science Foundation (project 21-14-00209). Bowling , D R , Schädel , C , Smith , K R , Richardson , A D , Bahn , M , Arain , M A , Varlagin , A , Ouimette , A P , Frank , J M , Barr , A G , Mammarella , I , Šigut , L , Foord , V , Burns , S P , Montagnani , L , Litvak , M E , Munger , J W , Ikawa , H , Hollinger , D Y , Blanken , P D , Ueyama , M , Matteucci , G , Bernhofer , C , Bohrer , G , Iwata , H , Ibrom , A , Pilegaard , K , Spittlehouse , D L , Kobayashi , H , Desai , A R , Staebler , R M & Black , T A 2024 , ' Phenology of Photosynthesis in Winter-Dormant Temperate and Boreal Forests : Long-Term Observations From Flux Towers and Quantitative Evaluation of Phenology Models ' , Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences , vol. 129 , no. 5 , e2023JG007839 . https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JG007839 ORCID: /0000-0002-8516-3356/work/160781061 http://hdl.handle.net/10138/576351 850c3887-eecb-4b1d-8158-f573c59e4a50 85191734712 001208690000001 cc_by_nc_nd info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess openAccess forest gross primary productivity phenology photosynthesis snowpack spring Physical sciences Article publishedVersion 2024 ftunivhelsihelda 2024-06-04T14:34:43Z We examined the seasonality of photosynthesis in 46 evergreen needleleaf (evergreen needleleaf forests (ENF)) and deciduous broadleaf (deciduous broadleaf forests (DBF)) forests across North America and Eurasia. We quantified the onset and end (StartGPP and EndGPP) of photosynthesis in spring and autumn based on the response of net ecosystem exchange of CO2 to sunlight. To test the hypothesis that snowmelt is required for photosynthesis to begin, these were compared with end of snowmelt derived from soil temperature. ENF forests achieved 10% of summer photosynthetic capacity ∼3 weeks before end of snowmelt, while DBF forests achieved that capacity ∼4 weeks afterward. DBF forests increased photosynthetic capacity in spring faster (1.95% d−1) than ENF (1.10% d−1), and their active season length (EndGPP–StartGPP) was ∼50 days shorter. We hypothesized that warming has influenced timing of the photosynthesis season. We found minimal evidence for long-term change in StartGPP, EndGPP, or air temperature, but their interannual anomalies were significantly correlated. Warmer weather was associated with earlier StartGPP (1.3–2.5 days °C−1) or later EndGPP (1.5–1.8 days °C−1, depending on forest type and month). Finally, we tested whether existing phenological models could predict StartGPP and EndGPP. For ENF forests, air temperature- and daylength-based models provided best predictions for StartGPP, while a chilling-degree-day model was best for EndGPP. The root mean square errors (RMSE) between predicted and observed StartGPP and EndGPP were 11.7 and 11.3 days, respectively. For DBF forests, temperature- and daylength-based models yielded the best results (RMSE 6.3 and 10.5 days). Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository