Comparing the effectiveness of competition as a method of reminding primary oral health care dentists to record diagnoses with two alternative methods used to enhance the recording of diagnoses in primary health care

• Published in: International Journal of Circumpolar Health
• Main Authors: Kallio, Jouko, Heikkinen, Anna Maria, Lehtovuori, Tuomo, Raina, Marko, Suominen, Lasse, Kauppila, Timo
• Other Authors: Department of Public Health, Clinicum, HUS Head and Neck Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: International Union for Circumpolar Health 2022
• Subjects: DOCUMENTATION; Electronic reminder; diagnosis; incentive; motivation; primary health care; 3121 General medicine; internal medicine and other clinical medicine; Circumpolar Health; International Journal of Circumpolar Health
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/349584

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether competition is an effective method to remind primary oral health care dentists to record diagnoses (RRD). The effectiveness of competition was examined in comparison with financial group bonuses (FGBs) and electronic reminders (ERs) of the electronic health record, together with superior-subordinate or development discussions. Putative differences in the diagnosis recording cultures of Finnish public health care physicians and dentists were studied. This was a retrospective quasi-experimental observational study in which the effects of the interventions on the rate of recording diagnoses were identified using a general linear regression model and proportions of visits with recorded diagnoses. The rate of increase in the recording of diagnoses in dentists was 0.995 +/- 0.273%/month (mean +/- SEM) after the implementation of RRDs and this did not differ from that obtained after starting FGBs (0.919 +/- 0.130%/month) or ERs with superior-subordinate or development discussions (1.562 +/- 0.277%/month) in physicians. As the rates of increase did not differ none of the applied methods seemed to be more effective than the others when trying to influence the behaviour of primary health care clinicians. Altogether, public primary health care physicians were more active than respective primary oral health care dentists to record diagnoses. Peer reviewed