Embodied emissions of buildings : A forgotten factor in green building certificates

Highlights • The pre-use stage (construction) emissions of buildings occur in a short time. • Wooden buildings seem to emit less compared to concrete ones in pre-use stage according to LCA. • Green building certificates need to consider embodied emissions more exhaustively. The construction and use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy and Buildings
Main Authors: Amiri, Ali, Emami, Nargessadat, Ottelin, Juudit, Sorvari, Jaana, Marteinsson, Björn, Heinonen, Jukka, Junnila, Seppo
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021
Subjects:
LCA
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10138/332289
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110962
id ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/332289
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/332289 2023-08-20T04:07:33+02:00 Embodied emissions of buildings : A forgotten factor in green building certificates Amiri, Ali Emami, Nargessadat Ottelin, Juudit Sorvari, Jaana Marteinsson, Björn Heinonen, Jukka Junnila, Seppo 2021-07-08T06:38:39Z application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10138/332289 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110962 eng eng Elsevier Energy and Buildings 241: 110962 0378-7788 Ali Amiri, Nargessadat Emami, Juudit Ottelin, Jaana Sorvari, Björn Marteinsson, Jukka Heinonen, Seppo Junnila, Embodied emissions of buildings - A forgotten factor in green building certificates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 241, 2021, 110962, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110962 Suomen ympäristökeskus http://hdl.handle.net/10138/332289 CC BY 4.0 openAccess LEED Leadership in energy and environmental design LCA Life cycle assessment sustainable development ecological construction building materials carbon footprint environmental certification emissions buildings natural resources wooden buildings environmental construction ecological design sustainability ecological sustainability tapaustutkimus energiankulutus Islanti elinkaarianalyysi puurakennukset rakennustekniikka kestävä kehitys rakennukset rakentaminen päästöt Article 2021 ftunivhelsihelda https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110962 2023-07-28T06:07:54Z Highlights • The pre-use stage (construction) emissions of buildings occur in a short time. • Wooden buildings seem to emit less compared to concrete ones in pre-use stage according to LCA. • Green building certificates need to consider embodied emissions more exhaustively. The construction and use of buildings consume a significant proportion of global energy and natural resources. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is arguably the most international green building certification system and attempts to take actions to limit energy use of buildings and construct them sustainably. While there has been a wide range of research mainly focused on energy use and emission production during the operation phase of LEED-certified buildings, research on embodied emissions is rare. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of LEED regarding initial (pre-use) embodied emissions using life cycle assessment (LCA). The study comprised several steps using a designed model. In the first step, three optional building material scenarios were defined (optimized concrete, hybrid concrete-wood, and wooden buildings) in addition to the base case concrete building located in Iceland. Second, an LCA was conducted for each scenario. Finally, the number of LEED points and the level of LEED certification was assessed for all studied scenarios. In addition, a comparison regarding embodied emissions consideration between LEED and Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) as mostly used green certificate was conducted in the discussion section. The LCA showed the lowest environmental impact for the wooden building followed by the hybrid concrete-wood building. In the LEED framework, wooden and hybrid scenarios obtained 14 and 8 points that were related to material selection. Among these points, only 3 (out of a total of 110 available points) were directly accredited to embodied emissions. The study recommends that the green building certificates increase the weight of sustainable ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Helsingfors Universitet: HELDA – Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto Energy and Buildings 241 110962
institution Open Polar
collection Helsingfors Universitet: HELDA – Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto
op_collection_id ftunivhelsihelda
language English
topic LEED
Leadership in energy and environmental design
LCA
Life cycle assessment
sustainable development
ecological construction
building materials
carbon footprint
environmental certification
emissions
buildings
natural resources
wooden buildings
environmental construction
ecological design
sustainability
ecological sustainability
tapaustutkimus
energiankulutus
Islanti
elinkaarianalyysi
puurakennukset
rakennustekniikka
kestävä kehitys
rakennukset
rakentaminen
päästöt
spellingShingle LEED
Leadership in energy and environmental design
LCA
Life cycle assessment
sustainable development
ecological construction
building materials
carbon footprint
environmental certification
emissions
buildings
natural resources
wooden buildings
environmental construction
ecological design
sustainability
ecological sustainability
tapaustutkimus
energiankulutus
Islanti
elinkaarianalyysi
puurakennukset
rakennustekniikka
kestävä kehitys
rakennukset
rakentaminen
päästöt
Amiri, Ali
Emami, Nargessadat
Ottelin, Juudit
Sorvari, Jaana
Marteinsson, Björn
Heinonen, Jukka
Junnila, Seppo
Embodied emissions of buildings : A forgotten factor in green building certificates
topic_facet LEED
Leadership in energy and environmental design
LCA
Life cycle assessment
sustainable development
ecological construction
building materials
carbon footprint
environmental certification
emissions
buildings
natural resources
wooden buildings
environmental construction
ecological design
sustainability
ecological sustainability
tapaustutkimus
energiankulutus
Islanti
elinkaarianalyysi
puurakennukset
rakennustekniikka
kestävä kehitys
rakennukset
rakentaminen
päästöt
description Highlights • The pre-use stage (construction) emissions of buildings occur in a short time. • Wooden buildings seem to emit less compared to concrete ones in pre-use stage according to LCA. • Green building certificates need to consider embodied emissions more exhaustively. The construction and use of buildings consume a significant proportion of global energy and natural resources. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) is arguably the most international green building certification system and attempts to take actions to limit energy use of buildings and construct them sustainably. While there has been a wide range of research mainly focused on energy use and emission production during the operation phase of LEED-certified buildings, research on embodied emissions is rare. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of LEED regarding initial (pre-use) embodied emissions using life cycle assessment (LCA). The study comprised several steps using a designed model. In the first step, three optional building material scenarios were defined (optimized concrete, hybrid concrete-wood, and wooden buildings) in addition to the base case concrete building located in Iceland. Second, an LCA was conducted for each scenario. Finally, the number of LEED points and the level of LEED certification was assessed for all studied scenarios. In addition, a comparison regarding embodied emissions consideration between LEED and Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) as mostly used green certificate was conducted in the discussion section. The LCA showed the lowest environmental impact for the wooden building followed by the hybrid concrete-wood building. In the LEED framework, wooden and hybrid scenarios obtained 14 and 8 points that were related to material selection. Among these points, only 3 (out of a total of 110 available points) were directly accredited to embodied emissions. The study recommends that the green building certificates increase the weight of sustainable ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Amiri, Ali
Emami, Nargessadat
Ottelin, Juudit
Sorvari, Jaana
Marteinsson, Björn
Heinonen, Jukka
Junnila, Seppo
author_facet Amiri, Ali
Emami, Nargessadat
Ottelin, Juudit
Sorvari, Jaana
Marteinsson, Björn
Heinonen, Jukka
Junnila, Seppo
author_sort Amiri, Ali
title Embodied emissions of buildings : A forgotten factor in green building certificates
title_short Embodied emissions of buildings : A forgotten factor in green building certificates
title_full Embodied emissions of buildings : A forgotten factor in green building certificates
title_fullStr Embodied emissions of buildings : A forgotten factor in green building certificates
title_full_unstemmed Embodied emissions of buildings : A forgotten factor in green building certificates
title_sort embodied emissions of buildings : a forgotten factor in green building certificates
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url http://hdl.handle.net/10138/332289
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110962
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation Energy and Buildings
241: 110962
0378-7788
Ali Amiri, Nargessadat Emami, Juudit Ottelin, Jaana Sorvari, Björn Marteinsson, Jukka Heinonen, Seppo Junnila, Embodied emissions of buildings - A forgotten factor in green building certificates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 241, 2021, 110962, ISSN 0378-7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110962.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110962
Suomen ympäristökeskus
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/332289
op_rights CC BY 4.0
openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110962
container_title Energy and Buildings
container_volume 241
container_start_page 110962
_version_ 1774719265252835328