Morphological change and the influence of language contacts in Estonian

Estonian is an illustrative example of a modern language that was intensively influenced by morphological attrition and foreign interfernce during the last millennium. The most salient typological differences of Estonian with respect to northern Finnic languages such as Finnish, Karelian and Veps ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grünthal, Riho
Other Authors: Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10138/328462
_version_ 1824233580933414912
author Grünthal, Riho
author2 Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies
author_facet Grünthal, Riho
author_sort Grünthal, Riho
collection HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository
description Estonian is an illustrative example of a modern language that was intensively influenced by morphological attrition and foreign interfernce during the last millennium. The most salient typological differences of Estonian with respect to northern Finnic languages such as Finnish, Karelian and Veps are based on the loss of several important suffixes, in particular those of certain grammatical cases. This article discusses the interliaison of morphological and contact-induced change in the evidence of Estonian inflectional case system, case syncretism and certain adverbial constructions. The main hypothesis is that diachronic changes often do not happen independently of one another and endogenous and contact-induced changes in Estonian affect the same functional domains. The conclusions of this article are mainly based on language-specific analysis and most of the data is drawn from Estonian. Nevertheless, there are certain parallels between case syncretism in Estonian, Vote and South-West Finnish dialects that will be used for comparative evidence. Convergent changes suggest that a particular morphological change does not inevitably have identical consequences even in genetically closely related languages.numbered, too, please let me know. Peer reviewed
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre karelian
genre_facet karelian
id ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/328462
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivhelsihelda
op_relation Beiträge zur morphologie
97-887-7674-249-2
dawa_publication: 171830
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/328462
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
openAccess
publishDate 2021
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/328462 2025-02-16T15:05:58+00:00 Morphological change and the influence of language contacts in Estonian Grünthal, Riho Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies 2021-03-29T16:53:42Z 30 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10138/328462 eng eng Beiträge zur morphologie 97-887-7674-249-2 dawa_publication: 171830 http://hdl.handle.net/10138/328462 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess openAccess Languages and Literature kielikontaktit viron kieli Languages Estonian Finnic languages morphology syncretism language change causality compensation syntactic change morphosyntax language history Chapter acceptedVersion 2021 ftunivhelsihelda 2025-01-21T16:11:30Z Estonian is an illustrative example of a modern language that was intensively influenced by morphological attrition and foreign interfernce during the last millennium. The most salient typological differences of Estonian with respect to northern Finnic languages such as Finnish, Karelian and Veps are based on the loss of several important suffixes, in particular those of certain grammatical cases. This article discusses the interliaison of morphological and contact-induced change in the evidence of Estonian inflectional case system, case syncretism and certain adverbial constructions. The main hypothesis is that diachronic changes often do not happen independently of one another and endogenous and contact-induced changes in Estonian affect the same functional domains. The conclusions of this article are mainly based on language-specific analysis and most of the data is drawn from Estonian. Nevertheless, there are certain parallels between case syncretism in Estonian, Vote and South-West Finnish dialects that will be used for comparative evidence. Convergent changes suggest that a particular morphological change does not inevitably have identical consequences even in genetically closely related languages.numbered, too, please let me know. Peer reviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper karelian HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository
spellingShingle Languages and Literature
kielikontaktit
viron kieli
Languages
Estonian
Finnic languages
morphology
syncretism
language change
causality
compensation
syntactic change
morphosyntax
language history
Grünthal, Riho
Morphological change and the influence of language contacts in Estonian
title Morphological change and the influence of language contacts in Estonian
title_full Morphological change and the influence of language contacts in Estonian
title_fullStr Morphological change and the influence of language contacts in Estonian
title_full_unstemmed Morphological change and the influence of language contacts in Estonian
title_short Morphological change and the influence of language contacts in Estonian
title_sort morphological change and the influence of language contacts in estonian
topic Languages and Literature
kielikontaktit
viron kieli
Languages
Estonian
Finnic languages
morphology
syncretism
language change
causality
compensation
syntactic change
morphosyntax
language history
topic_facet Languages and Literature
kielikontaktit
viron kieli
Languages
Estonian
Finnic languages
morphology
syncretism
language change
causality
compensation
syntactic change
morphosyntax
language history
url http://hdl.handle.net/10138/328462