Finland's Continuation War (1941-1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War? : Analyzed from the International - Especially Legal - Perspective

Tämä on ensimmäinen kansainvälisoikeudellinen analyysi jatkosodan oikeudellisesta luonteesta. Oliko se kansainvälisen oikeuden kieltämä hyökkäyssota vai sallima puolustussota? Oliko se Liittolaissota Saksan kanssa vai Suomen erillissota Neuvostoliittoa vastaan? Johtopäätökseni: syksyllä 1941 Suomi l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online
Main Author: Hannikainen, Lauri
Other Authors: Faculty of Law, The Erik Castrén Institute of International Law and Human Rights
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Brill Nijhoff 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10138/327262
_version_ 1826779477392228352
author Hannikainen, Lauri
author2 Faculty of Law
The Erik Castrén Institute of International Law and Human Rights
author_facet Hannikainen, Lauri
author_sort Hannikainen, Lauri
collection HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
container_title Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online
container_volume 17
description Tämä on ensimmäinen kansainvälisoikeudellinen analyysi jatkosodan oikeudellisesta luonteesta. Oliko se kansainvälisen oikeuden kieltämä hyökkäyssota vai sallima puolustussota? Oliko se Liittolaissota Saksan kanssa vai Suomen erillissota Neuvostoliittoa vastaan? Johtopäätökseni: syksyllä 1941 Suomi liittyi Saksan laittomaan hyökkäyssotaan Neuvostoliittoon ja Suomi valtasi Neuvostoliitolle kuuluneen Itä-Karjalan. Vuoden 1942 alkuun mennessä Suomi katsoi saavuttaneensa sen, mitä se tavoitteli, ja sen sodankäynti muuttui rintamasodaksi ja svuodesta 1943 lähtien puolustussodaksi. Liitto Saksan kanssa kävi heikommaksi, mutta Saksalta saamansa avun takia Suomi pysyi muodollisesti Saksan liittolaisena aina rauhan solmimiseen saakka eli syyskuuhun 1944. In September 1939, after having included a secret protocol on spheres of influence in the so-called Molotov- Ribbentrop Pact, Germany and the Soviet Union invaded Poland and divided it between themselves. It was not long before the Soviet Union approached Finland by proposing exchanges of certain territories: ‘in our national interest we want to have from you certain territories and offer in exchange territories twice as large but in less crucial areas’. Finland, suspicious of Soviet motives, refused – the outcome was the Soviet war of aggression against Finland by the name of the Winter War in 1939–1940. The Soviet Union won this war and compelled Finland to cede several territories – about 10 per cent of Finland’s area. After the Winter War, Finland sought protection from Germany against the Soviet Union and decided to rely on Germany. After Germany attacked the Soviet Union in June 1941, Finland joined the German war effort in the so-called Continuation War and reoccupied the territories lost in the Winter War. Finnish forces did not stop at the old border but occupied Eastern (Soviet) Karelia with a desire eventually to annex it. By that measure, Finland joined as Germany’s ally in its war of aggression against the Soviet Union in violation of international law. In ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre karelia*
genre_facet karelia*
id ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/327262
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivhelsihelda
op_container_end_page 121
op_relation 10.1163/22115897_01701_006
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/327262
op_rights unspecified
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
openAccess
publishDate 2021
publisher Brill Nijhoff
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivhelsihelda:oai:helda.helsinki.fi:10138/327262 2025-03-16T15:29:38+00:00 Finland's Continuation War (1941-1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War? : Analyzed from the International - Especially Legal - Perspective Suomen jatkosota (1941-1944): Hyökkäys- vai puolustussota? Liittolais- vai erillissota? : Analyysi kansainvälisestä - etenkin oikeudellisesta - näkökulmasta Hannikainen, Lauri Faculty of Law The Erik Castrén Institute of International Law and Human Rights 2021-03-01T08:14:01Z 45 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10138/327262 eng eng Brill Nijhoff 10.1163/22115897_01701_006 http://hdl.handle.net/10138/327262 unspecified info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess openAccess Law jatkosota hyökkäyssota. liittolaissota Article acceptedVersion 2021 ftunivhelsihelda 2025-02-17T01:22:23Z Tämä on ensimmäinen kansainvälisoikeudellinen analyysi jatkosodan oikeudellisesta luonteesta. Oliko se kansainvälisen oikeuden kieltämä hyökkäyssota vai sallima puolustussota? Oliko se Liittolaissota Saksan kanssa vai Suomen erillissota Neuvostoliittoa vastaan? Johtopäätökseni: syksyllä 1941 Suomi liittyi Saksan laittomaan hyökkäyssotaan Neuvostoliittoon ja Suomi valtasi Neuvostoliitolle kuuluneen Itä-Karjalan. Vuoden 1942 alkuun mennessä Suomi katsoi saavuttaneensa sen, mitä se tavoitteli, ja sen sodankäynti muuttui rintamasodaksi ja svuodesta 1943 lähtien puolustussodaksi. Liitto Saksan kanssa kävi heikommaksi, mutta Saksalta saamansa avun takia Suomi pysyi muodollisesti Saksan liittolaisena aina rauhan solmimiseen saakka eli syyskuuhun 1944. In September 1939, after having included a secret protocol on spheres of influence in the so-called Molotov- Ribbentrop Pact, Germany and the Soviet Union invaded Poland and divided it between themselves. It was not long before the Soviet Union approached Finland by proposing exchanges of certain territories: ‘in our national interest we want to have from you certain territories and offer in exchange territories twice as large but in less crucial areas’. Finland, suspicious of Soviet motives, refused – the outcome was the Soviet war of aggression against Finland by the name of the Winter War in 1939–1940. The Soviet Union won this war and compelled Finland to cede several territories – about 10 per cent of Finland’s area. After the Winter War, Finland sought protection from Germany against the Soviet Union and decided to rely on Germany. After Germany attacked the Soviet Union in June 1941, Finland joined the German war effort in the so-called Continuation War and reoccupied the territories lost in the Winter War. Finnish forces did not stop at the old border but occupied Eastern (Soviet) Karelia with a desire eventually to annex it. By that measure, Finland joined as Germany’s ally in its war of aggression against the Soviet Union in violation of international law. In ... Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* HELDA – University of Helsinki Open Repository Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online 17 1 77 121
spellingShingle Law
jatkosota
hyökkäyssota. liittolaissota
Hannikainen, Lauri
Finland's Continuation War (1941-1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War? : Analyzed from the International - Especially Legal - Perspective
title Finland's Continuation War (1941-1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War? : Analyzed from the International - Especially Legal - Perspective
title_full Finland's Continuation War (1941-1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War? : Analyzed from the International - Especially Legal - Perspective
title_fullStr Finland's Continuation War (1941-1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War? : Analyzed from the International - Especially Legal - Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Finland's Continuation War (1941-1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War? : Analyzed from the International - Especially Legal - Perspective
title_short Finland's Continuation War (1941-1944): War of Aggression or Defence? War of Alliance or Separate War? : Analyzed from the International - Especially Legal - Perspective
title_sort finland's continuation war (1941-1944): war of aggression or defence? war of alliance or separate war? : analyzed from the international - especially legal - perspective
topic Law
jatkosota
hyökkäyssota. liittolaissota
topic_facet Law
jatkosota
hyökkäyssota. liittolaissota
url http://hdl.handle.net/10138/327262