Inconsistent Response of Arctic Permafrost Peatland Carbon Accumulation to Warm Climate Phases

• Published in: Global Biogeochemical Cycles
• Main Authors: Zhang, Hui, Gallego-Sala, Angela V., Amesbury, Matthew J., Charman, Dan J., Piilo, Sanna Riikka, Väliranta, Minna Maria
• Other Authors: Environmental Change and Policy, Environmental Sciences, Environmental Change Research Unit (ECRU), Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley Blackwell 2018
• Subjects: Environmental sciences; SOUTH-CENTRAL ALASKA; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; HOLOCENE CLIMATE; PLANT MACROFOSSILS; VEGETATION CHANGE; BOREAL PEATLANDS; FINNISH LAPLAND; LAST MILLENNIUM; TESTATE AMEBA; DYNAMICS; Arctic; Climate change; Ice; permafrost; Alaska; Lapland
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/276995

Northern peatlands have accumulated large carbon (C) stocks since the last deglaciation and during past millennia they have acted as important atmospheric C sinks. However, it is still poorly understood how northern peatlands in general and Arctic permafrost peatlands in particular will respond to future climate change. In this study, we present C accumulation reconstructions derived from 14 peat cores from four permafrost peatlands in northeast European Russia and Finnish Lapland. The main focus is on warm climate phases. We used regression analyses to test the importance of different environmental variables such as summer temperature, hydrology, and vegetation as drivers for nonautogenic C accumulation. We used modeling approaches to simulate potential decomposition patterns. The data show that our study sites have been persistent mid- to late-Holocene C sinks with an average accumulation rate of 10.80-32.40g C m(-2) year(-1). The warmer climate phase during the Holocene Thermal Maximum stimulated faster apparent C accumulation rates while the Medieval Climate Anomaly did not. Moreover, during the Little Ice Age, apparent C accumulation rates were controlled more by other factors than by cold climate per se. Although we could not identify any significant environmental factor that drove C accumulation, our data show that recent warming has increased C accumulation in some permafrost peatland sites. However, the synchronous slight decrease of C accumulation in other sites may be an alternative response of these peatlands to warming in the future. This would lead to a decrease in the C sequestration ability of permafrost peatlands overall. Peer reviewed