Do contemporary (1980-2015) emissions determine the elemental carbon deposition trend at Holtedahlfonna glacier, Svalbard?

• Published in: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
• Main Authors: Ruppel, Meri M., Soares, Joana, Gallet, Jean-Charles, Isaksson, Elisabeth, Martma, Tonu, Svensson, Jonas, Kohler, Jack, Pedersen, Christina A., Manninen, Sirkku, Korhola, Atte, Strom, Johan
• Other Authors: Environmental Sciences, Environmental Change Research Unit (ECRU)
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH 2017
• Subjects: BIOMASS BURNING EMISSIONS; VESTFONNA ICE CAP; BLACK CARBON; ASSIMILATION SYSTEM; SNOW; MODEL; DISPERSION; PARTICLES; SPITSBERGEN; VARIABILITY; 1172 Environmental sciences; 119 Other natural sciences; Arctic; Holtedahlfonna; Svalbard; Vestfonna; albedo; black carbon; glacier; Ice cap; ice core; Spitsbergen
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/228552

The climate impact of black carbon (BC) is notably amplified in the Arctic by its deposition, which causes albedo decrease and subsequent earlier snow and ice spring melt. To comprehensively assess the climate impact of BC in the Arctic, information on both atmospheric BC concentrations and deposition is essential. Currently, Arctic BC deposition data are very scarce, while atmospheric BC concentrations have been shown to generally decrease since the 1990s. However, a 300-year Svalbard ice core showed a distinct increase in EC (elemental carbon, proxy for BC) deposition from 1970 to 2004 contradicting atmospheric measurements and modelling studies. Here, our objective was to decipher whether this increase has continued in the 21st century and to investigate the drivers of the observed EC deposition trends. For this, a shallow firn core was collected from the same Svalbard glacier, and a regional-to-meso-scale chemical transport model (SILAM) was run from 1980 to 2015. The ice and firn core data indicate peaking EC deposition values at the end of the 1990s and lower values thereafter. The modelled BC deposition results generally support the observed glacier EC variations. However, the ice and firn core results clearly deviate from both measured and modelled atmospheric BC concentration trends, and the modelled BC deposition trend shows variations seemingly independent from BC emission or atmospheric BC concentration trends. wet-deposited at this Svalbard glacier, indicating that meteorological processes such as precipitation and scavenging efficiency have most likely a stronger influence on the BC deposition trend than BC emission or atmospheric concentration trends. BC emission source sectors contribute differently to the modelled atmospheric BC concentrations and BC deposition, which further supports our conclusion that different processes affect atmospheric BC concentration and deposition trends. Consequently, Arctic BC deposition trends should not directly be inferred based on atmospheric BC measurements, and ...