Knowing and remembering: Rethinking lexical recall as a measure of proficiency in endangered language communities

This paper problematizes the assessment of speakers’ proficiency in endangered language communities. We focus in particular on processes of lexical production and elicitation as proxies for full proficiency assessment. Among linguists, it is standard to assess a speaker’s knowledge of specific lexic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daria Boltokova, Jessica Kantarovich, Lenore Grenoble, Maria Pupynina
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: University of Hawaii Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10125/74676
id ftunivhawaiimano:oai:scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu:10125/74676
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivhawaiimano:oai:scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu:10125/74676 2024-09-15T18:01:59+00:00 Knowing and remembering: Rethinking lexical recall as a measure of proficiency in endangered language communities Daria Boltokova Jessica Kantarovich Lenore Grenoble Maria Pupynina 2022-07 Article 23 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10125/74676 eng eng University of Hawaii Press Boltokova, Daria, Jessica Kantarovich, Lenore Grenoble, Maria Pupynina. 2022. Knowing and remembering: Rethinking lexical recall as a measure of proficiency in endangered language communities. Language Documentation & Conservation 16: 145-167. 1934-5275 https://hdl.handle.net/10125/74676 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Text 2022 ftunivhawaiimano 2024-07-31T01:48:16Z This paper problematizes the assessment of speakers’ proficiency in endangered language communities. We focus in particular on processes of lexical production and elicitation as proxies for full proficiency assessment. Among linguists, it is standard to assess a speaker’s knowledge of specific lexical items in order to set a baseline for further data collection and research. Yet, as we argue in this paper, such tests can give the false impression that speakers do not know their language, since such tests do not distinguish between what speakers can recall in a particular moment and what they do not know because they did not acquire it. The endangered language context in particular calls for a more fine-tuned interpretation of lexical knowledge, given the high degree of idiolectal variation and lack of a community-based standard language. Drawing on fieldwork with Chukchi and Even Indigenous communities in northeastern Russia, we analyze lexical items that speakers claim to not remember. We then distinguish different reasons that are given for not remembering and consider their implications for speakers’ proficiency. Finally, we conclude with two recommendations for improving elicitation and language assessment tests. National Foreign Language Resource Center Text Chukchi ScholarSpace at University of Hawaii at Manoa
institution Open Polar
collection ScholarSpace at University of Hawaii at Manoa
op_collection_id ftunivhawaiimano
language English
description This paper problematizes the assessment of speakers’ proficiency in endangered language communities. We focus in particular on processes of lexical production and elicitation as proxies for full proficiency assessment. Among linguists, it is standard to assess a speaker’s knowledge of specific lexical items in order to set a baseline for further data collection and research. Yet, as we argue in this paper, such tests can give the false impression that speakers do not know their language, since such tests do not distinguish between what speakers can recall in a particular moment and what they do not know because they did not acquire it. The endangered language context in particular calls for a more fine-tuned interpretation of lexical knowledge, given the high degree of idiolectal variation and lack of a community-based standard language. Drawing on fieldwork with Chukchi and Even Indigenous communities in northeastern Russia, we analyze lexical items that speakers claim to not remember. We then distinguish different reasons that are given for not remembering and consider their implications for speakers’ proficiency. Finally, we conclude with two recommendations for improving elicitation and language assessment tests. National Foreign Language Resource Center
format Text
author Daria Boltokova
Jessica Kantarovich
Lenore Grenoble
Maria Pupynina
spellingShingle Daria Boltokova
Jessica Kantarovich
Lenore Grenoble
Maria Pupynina
Knowing and remembering: Rethinking lexical recall as a measure of proficiency in endangered language communities
author_facet Daria Boltokova
Jessica Kantarovich
Lenore Grenoble
Maria Pupynina
author_sort Daria Boltokova
title Knowing and remembering: Rethinking lexical recall as a measure of proficiency in endangered language communities
title_short Knowing and remembering: Rethinking lexical recall as a measure of proficiency in endangered language communities
title_full Knowing and remembering: Rethinking lexical recall as a measure of proficiency in endangered language communities
title_fullStr Knowing and remembering: Rethinking lexical recall as a measure of proficiency in endangered language communities
title_full_unstemmed Knowing and remembering: Rethinking lexical recall as a measure of proficiency in endangered language communities
title_sort knowing and remembering: rethinking lexical recall as a measure of proficiency in endangered language communities
publisher University of Hawaii Press
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/10125/74676
genre Chukchi
genre_facet Chukchi
op_relation Boltokova, Daria, Jessica Kantarovich, Lenore Grenoble, Maria Pupynina. 2022. Knowing and remembering: Rethinking lexical recall as a measure of proficiency in endangered language communities. Language Documentation & Conservation 16: 145-167.
1934-5275
https://hdl.handle.net/10125/74676
op_rights Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
_version_ 1810439059275776000