EARTHQUAKE RESISTING POTENTIAL OF INNOVATIVE HYBRID COUPLED SHEAR WALLS WITH LASER-CUT OPEN-TO-CIRCULAR HOLLOW SECTION CONNECTIONS

Although conventional reinforced concrete (RC) or hybrid coupled wall (HCW) structures have been used for a number of years as earthquake resistant system in high to moderate seismic areas thanks to their lateral strength, stiffness, and energy dissipation characteristics, some drawbacks such as exp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Structural Engineering
Main Author: Das, Rajarshi
Other Authors: Degée, Hervé
Format: Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Steel-concrete hybrid structures
Shear links
Seismic-resistant structures
Steel and concrete hybrid connections
Embedment length
Embedded steel sections
Beam-to-CHS-column connection
Tubular structures
CHS joints
Hollow section joints
Through Beam connections
Passing-through joints
Arctic
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29621
id ftunivhasselt:oai:documentserver.uhasselt.be:1942/29621
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Document Server@UHasselt (Hasselt University)
op_collection_id ftunivhasselt
language English
topic Steel-concrete hybrid structures
Shear links
Seismic-resistant structures
Steel and concrete hybrid connections
Embedment length
Embedded steel sections
Beam-to-CHS-column connection
Tubular structures
CHS joints
Hollow section joints
Through Beam connections
Passing-through joints
spellingShingle Steel-concrete hybrid structures
Shear links
Seismic-resistant structures
Steel and concrete hybrid connections
Embedment length
Embedded steel sections
Beam-to-CHS-column connection
Tubular structures
CHS joints
Hollow section joints
Through Beam connections
Passing-through joints
Das, Rajarshi
EARTHQUAKE RESISTING POTENTIAL OF INNOVATIVE HYBRID COUPLED SHEAR WALLS WITH LASER-CUT OPEN-TO-CIRCULAR HOLLOW SECTION CONNECTIONS
topic_facet Steel-concrete hybrid structures
Shear links
Seismic-resistant structures
Steel and concrete hybrid connections
Embedment length
Embedded steel sections
Beam-to-CHS-column connection
Tubular structures
CHS joints
Hollow section joints
Through Beam connections
Passing-through joints
description Although conventional reinforced concrete (RC) or hybrid coupled wall (HCW) structures have been used for a number of years as earthquake resistant system in high to moderate seismic areas thanks to their lateral strength, stiffness, and energy dissipation characteristics, some drawbacks such as expensive detailing, costly foundations, large overall weight of the system, difficult restoration works etc. have limited their paramount potential from a structural as well as an economic perspective. In order to minimize these drawbacks and make further advancement, an innovative HCW system is proposed in this thesis consisting of a single RC wall coupled with two steel side circular hollow section (CHS) columns via steel coupling shear critical beams. The RC wall carries almost all the horizontal shear force while the overturning moments are partially resisted by an axial compression-tension couple developed by the two CHS columns rather than by the individual flexural action of the wall alone. The steel coupling beams are bolted to a steel profile either partly embedded in the RC wall or passing through it. Optimized procedures were developed to design both type of connections in an economically efficient manner and also ensuring that the damage always occurs in the steel shear beams (fuses) prior to any damage in the RC wall in general and in the connection zone in particular. Furthermore, this thesis introduces and investigates different types of innovative I-beam-to-CHS-column “passing-through” connections which minimizes the limitations in the existing (or conventional) beam-to-CHS column connections and therefore promote their use in the modern steel industry. Standard design guidelines have thus been developed in accordance with Eurocode provisions for gravitational and earthquake loading scenarios to calculate the ultimate resistances of such joints and are discussed with nonlinear FE simulations verified through experimental results. They are also compared with conventional (direct weld) joints to highlight ...
author2 Degée, Hervé
format Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
author Das, Rajarshi
author_facet Das, Rajarshi
author_sort Das, Rajarshi
title EARTHQUAKE RESISTING POTENTIAL OF INNOVATIVE HYBRID COUPLED SHEAR WALLS WITH LASER-CUT OPEN-TO-CIRCULAR HOLLOW SECTION CONNECTIONS
title_short EARTHQUAKE RESISTING POTENTIAL OF INNOVATIVE HYBRID COUPLED SHEAR WALLS WITH LASER-CUT OPEN-TO-CIRCULAR HOLLOW SECTION CONNECTIONS
title_full EARTHQUAKE RESISTING POTENTIAL OF INNOVATIVE HYBRID COUPLED SHEAR WALLS WITH LASER-CUT OPEN-TO-CIRCULAR HOLLOW SECTION CONNECTIONS
title_fullStr EARTHQUAKE RESISTING POTENTIAL OF INNOVATIVE HYBRID COUPLED SHEAR WALLS WITH LASER-CUT OPEN-TO-CIRCULAR HOLLOW SECTION CONNECTIONS
title_full_unstemmed EARTHQUAKE RESISTING POTENTIAL OF INNOVATIVE HYBRID COUPLED SHEAR WALLS WITH LASER-CUT OPEN-TO-CIRCULAR HOLLOW SECTION CONNECTIONS
title_sort earthquake resisting potential of innovative hybrid coupled shear walls with laser-cut open-to-circular hollow section connections
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29621
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation [1] T. Paulay, M. J. N. Priestley, Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, Wiley, New York (1992). [2] T. Paulay, Coupling beams of reinforced concrete shear walls, ASCE Journal of Structural Division 97 (3) (1971) 843–862. [3] T. Paulay, A. R. Santhakumar, Ductile behaviour of coupled shear walls, ASCE Journal of Structural Division 102 (1) (1976) 93–108. [4] B. Gong, K. A. Harries, B. M. Shahrooz, Behaviour and design of reinforced concrete, steel, and steel–concrete coupling beams, Earthquake Spectra 16 (4) (2000) 775–799. [5] W. S. Park, H. D. Yun, Seismic behaviour of coupling beams in a hybrid coupled shear walls, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 61 (11) (2005) 1492–1524. [6] S. El-Tawil, G. G. Deierlein, Nonlinear analyses of mixed steel-concrete moment frames. Part I - beam-column element formulation. Part II - implementation and verification, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 127 (6) (2001) 647-665. [7] S. El-Tawil, C. M. Kuenzli, M. Hassan, Pushover of hybrid coupled walls. Part I: design and modelling, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (10) (2002a) 1272-1281. [8] S. El-Tawil, C. M. Kuenzli, Pushover of hybrid coupled walls. Part II: analysis and behavior, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (10) (2002b) 1282-1289. [9] P. J. Fortney, B. M. Shahrooz, G. A. Rassati, Large scale testing of a replaceable ‘fuse’ steel coupling beam, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 133(12) (2007a). [10] P. J. Fortney, B. M. Shahrooz, G. A. Rassati, Seismic performance evaluation of coupled core walls with concrete and steel coupling beams, Journal of Steel and Composite Structures 7 (4) (2007b) 279-301. [11] P. J. Fortney, S. Noe, G. A. Rassati, B. M. Shahrooz, A steel-concrete composite solution for practical design of coupling beams, Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (2006a). [12] P. J. Fortney, The next generation of coupling beams, Doctoral Thesis, University of Cincinnati (2005). [13] B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, Steel-concrete composite coupling beams – behavior and design, Engineering Structures 23 (11) (2001a) 1480-1490. [14] B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, Concrete-steel composite coupling beams-Part I: component testing, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 127 (6) (2001b) 625-631. [15] B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, Concrete-steel composite coupling beams-Part II: subassembly testing and design verification, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 127 (6) (2001c) 632-637. [16] B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, A. J. Gillum, Cyclic response of composite coupling beams, ACI Special Publication 174 – Hybrid and Composite Structures (1998) 89-112. [17] K. A. Harries, B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, Behavior and design of reinforced concrete, steel, and steel-concrete coupling beams, Earthquake Spectra 16 (4) (2000) 775-799. [18] K. A. Harries, D. Mitchell, R. G. Redwood, W. D. Cook, Nonlinear seismic response predictions of walls coupled with steel and concrete beams, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 25 (5) (1998) 803-818. [19] K. A. Harries, D. Mitchell, W. D. Cook, R. G. Redwood, Seismic response of steel beams coupling reinforced concrete walls, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 119 (12) (1993) 3611-3629. [20] B. M. Shahrooz, M. A. Remmetter, F. Qin, Seismic response of composite coupled walls, Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete II, Proceedings paper (1992) 429-441. [21] B. M. Shahrooz, M. E. Remmetter, F. Qin, Seismic design and performance of composite coupled walls, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 119 (11) (1993) 3291-3309. [22] B. M. Shahrooz, J. T. Deason, G. Tunc, Outrigger beam – wall connections: part i component testing and development of design model, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 30 (2) (2004a) 253-261. [23] B. M. Shahrooz, G. Tunc, J. T. Deason, Outrigger beam – wall connections: part ii-subassembly testing and further modeling enhancements, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 130 (2) (2004b) 262-270. [24] B. M. Shahrooz, B. Gong B, G. Tunc, J. D. Deason, An overview of reinforced concrete core wall-steel frame hybrid structures, Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 3 (2) (2001) 149-158. [25] G. Xuan, B. M. Shahrooz, Performance based design of a 15 story reinforced concrete coupled core wall structure, Report No. UC-CII 05/03, Cincinnati Infrastructure Institute (2005). [26] A. Dall'Asta, A. Zona, G. Leoni, T. Bogdan, Innovative hybrid and composite steel–concrete structural solutions for building in seismic area, Final Report, EUR 26932 EN, European Commission, 2015http://dx.doi.org/10.2777/85404 (2015). [27] A. Zona, H. Degee, G. Leoni, A. Dall’Asta, A., Ductile design of innovative steel and concrete hybrid coupled walls, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 117 (2016) 204–213. [28] ACI 318-08 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills MI (2011). [29] M. Hassan, Inelastic dynamic behavior and design of hybrid coupled wall systems, Doctoral thesis, University of Central Florida (2004). [30] T. Paulay, A displacement-focused seismic design of mixed building systems, Earthquake Spectra 18 (4) (2002) 689- 718. [31] FEMA-306 Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC (1998). [32] K. A. Harries, Ductility and deformability of coupling beams in reinforced concrete coupled walls, Earthquake Spectra 17 (3) (2001) 457-478. [33] K. A. Harries, B. M. Shahrooz, Hybrid coupled wall systems, Concrete International 27 (5) (2005) 45-51. [34] K. A. Harries, D. Mitchell, R. G. Redwood, W. D. Cook, Seismic design of coupling beams - a case for mixed construction, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 24 (3) (1997) 448-459. [35] S. El-Tawil, P. J. Fortney, K. A. Harries, B. M. Shahrooz, Y. Kurama, M. Hassan, X. Tong, Recommendations for seismic design of hybrid coupled wall systems, ASCE/SEI (2009). [36] M. D. Engelhardt, E. P. Popov, On design of eccentrically braced frames, Earthquake Spectra 5 (3) (1989) 495-511. [37] A. Zona, L. Tassotti, G. Leoni, A. Dall’Asta, Nonlinear seismic response analysis of an innovative steel-and-concrete hybrid coupled wall system, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 144(7) (2018). DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002080. [38] A. K. W. Lim, The nonlinear response of reinforced concrete coupling slabs with drop panels in earthquake resisting shear wall structures, Master’s Thesis, McGill University (1989). [39] S. El Tawil, K. A. Harries, P. J. Fortney, B. M. Shahrooz, Seismic design of hybrid coupled wall systems: state of the art, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 136 (7) (2010). [40] K. A. Harries, D. S. McNeice, Performance-based design of high-rise coupled wall systems, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Structures 15 (3) (2006) 289-306. [41] K. A. Harries, D. Moulton, R. Clemson, Parametric study of coupled wall behavior – implications for the design of coupling beams, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 130 (3) (2004) 480-488. [42] A. E. Aktan, V. V. Bertero, Conceptual seismic design of frame-wall structures, Journal of Structural Engineering 110 (11) (1984) 2778–2797. [43] G. Xuan, B. M. Shahrooz, K. A. Harries, G. A. Rassati, A performance-based design approach for coupled core wall systems with diagonally reinforced concrete coupling beams, Advances in Structural Engineering 11 (3) (2008). [44] V. V. Bertero, J. C. Anderson, H. Krawinkler, E. Miranda, and the CUREE and Kajima Research Teams, Design guidelines for ductility and drift limits, Report No. UCB/EERC-91/15, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, CA (1991). [45] ASCE 7-10 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston VA (2010). [46] B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, Seismic behavior and design of composite coupled wall systems, Report No. UC-CII 98/01, Cincinnati Infrastructure Institute, Cincinnati, OH (1998). [47] L. Chitty, On the cantilever composed of a number of parallel beams interconnected by cross bars, London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 83 (1947) 685-699. [48] I. A. MacLeod, Lateral stiffness of shear walls with openings in tall buildings, Symposium in Tall Buildings, Pergamon Press, Oxford, (1967) 223-244. [49] J. Schwaighofer, Analysis of shear wall structures using standard computer programs, ACI Proceedings 66 (12) 1969. [50] R. W. Furlong, Effective stiffness of composite shear walls, Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete, ASCE Proceedings of an Engineering Foundation Conference 5(3) (1996) 250-257. [51] ACI, Earthquake Effects on Reinforced Concrete Structures, US-Japan Cooperative Earthquake Research Program, ACI Special Publication SP-84, American Concrete Institute, Detroit (1984). [52] S. Okamoto, S. Nakata, Y. Kitagawa, M. Yoshimura, T. Kaminosono, A progress report on the full scale seismic experiment of a seven-story reinforced concrete building- part of the US-Japan cooperative program, B.R.I Research Paper No. 94, Building Research Institute, Ministry of Construction, Japan, (1985). [53] T. Kabeyasawa, H. Shiohara, S. Otani, H. Aoyama, Analysis of full scale seven-story reinforced concrete test structure: Test PSD-3, Proceedings of 3rd Joint Technical Coordinating Committee, US-Japan Cooperative Earthquake Research Program, Building Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan (1982). [54] ANSI/AISC 325-11- Steel Construction Manual, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago (2011). [55] K. A. Harries, P. J. Fortney, B. M. Shahrooz, P. Brienen, Design of practical diagonally reinforced concrete coupling beams – A critical review of ACI 318 requirements, ACI Structures Journal 102 (6) (2005) 876-882. [56] FEMA-350, Recommended Seismic Design Criteria For New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C (2000). [57] FEMA-356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Reston, Virginia, (2000). [58] K. D. Hjelmstad, E. P. Popov, Seismic behavior of active beam links in eccentrically braced frames, Report No. UCB/EERC-83/15, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA (1983). [59] J. O. Malley, E. P. Popov, Design considerations for shear links in eccentrically brace frames, Report No. UCB/EERC-83/24, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA (1983). [60] K. Kasai, E. P. Popov, A study of seismically resistant eccentrically braced steel frame systems, Report No. UCB/EERC-86/01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA (1986a). [61] K. Kasai, E. P. Popov, General behavior of WF steel shear link beams, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 112 (2) (1986b) 362-382. [62] K. Kasai, E. P. Popov, Cyclic web buckling control for shear link beams, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 112 (3) (1986c) 505-521. [63] J. Ricles, E. P. Popov, Dynamic analysis of seismically resistant EBFs, Report No. UCB/EERC-87/07, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA (1987b). [64] T. Balendra, M. T. Sam, C. Y. Liaw, S. L. Lee, Preliminary studies into the behavior of knee braced frames subject to seismic loading, Engineering Structures 13 (1) (1991) 67-74. [65] D. C. Rai, B.J. Wallace, Aluminum shear-links for enhanced seismic resistance, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 27 (4) (1998) 315-342. [66] A. Ghobarah, H.A. Elfath, Rehabilitation of a reinforced concrete frame using eccentric steel bracing, Engineering Structures 23 (7) (2001) 745-755. [67] C. C. McDaniel, C. M. Uang, F. Seible, Cyclic testing of built-up steel shear links for the new bay bridge, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 129(6) (2003) 801-809. [68] K. Marcakis, D. Mitchell, Precast concrete connections with embedded steel members, Journal Prestressed Concrete Institute, 25 (4) (1980) 86-116. [69] A. H. Mattock, G. H. Gaafar, Strength of embedded steel sections as brackets, ACI Journal 79 (9) (1982) 83-93. [70] L. B. Kriz, C. H. Raths, Connection in precast concrete structures – shear strength of column heads, Journal Prestressed Concrete Institute 8 (6) (1963) 45–75. [71] D. C. Kent, R. Park, Flexural members with confined concrete, ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, 97 (ST7) (1971) 1969–90. [72] K. Minami, Beam to Column stress transfer in composite structures, Composite and mixed construction, Proceeding paper, New York (1985). [73] C. H. Raths, Embedded structural steel connections, PCI Committee on Connection Details, PCI Manual on Design of Connections for Precast Prestressed Concrete, Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, 104-112 (1973). [74] W. S. Park, H. D. Yun, Seismic behaviour of steel coupling beams linking reinforced concrete shear walls, Engineering Structures 27 (2004) 1024–1039. [75] G. G. Deierlein, Design of Moment Connections for Composite Framed Structures, Doctoral Thesis, University of Texas at Austin (1988). [76] G. G. Deierlein, T. M. Sheikh, J. A. Yura, J. O. Jirsa, Beam-column moment connections for composite frames: Part 2, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering. 115 (11) (1989) 2877-2896. [77] ASCE Task Committee on Design Criteria for Composite Structures in Steel and Concrete, Guidelines for Design of Joints between Steel Beams and Reinforced Concrete Columns, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 120 (8) (1994) 2330-2357. [78] C. J. Motter, Large-scale testing of steel-reinforced concrete (src) coupling beams embedded into reinforced concrete structural walls, Doctoral Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (2014). [79] BLM Group, All in one tube technology no: 20, Inspired Tube. (2015). [80] O.S. Bursi, Prefabricated composite beam-to-column filled tube or partially reinforced-concrete encased column connections for severe seismic and fire loadings, RFSR-CT-2003-00034, Final Report, (2009). [81] J. Wardenier, J. A. Packer, X. L. Zhao, G. J. Van der Vegte, Hollow sections in structural applications, CIDECT, Geneva, Switzerland (2010). [82] J. Wardenier, Y. Kurobane, J. A. Packer, G. J. van der Vegte, X.-L. Zhao, Design guide for circular hollow section (CHS) joints under predominantly static loading, CIDECT Design Guide 1 (2008). [83] L. Twilit, R. Hass, W. Klingsch, M. Edwards, D. Dutta, Design guide for structural hollow section columns exposed to fire, CIDECT (1994). [84] J. F. Demonceau, V. L. Hoang, J. P. Jaspart, Performance-based approaches for high strength tubular columns and connections under earthquake and fire loadings, Final Report, RFSR CT-2008-00037 (2013). [85] L. Simões da Silva, A. Santiago, F. Lopes, Design of composite joints for improved fire robustness, Final Report RFSR-CT-2009-00021 (2014). [86] Y. Kurobane, J. A. Packer, J. Wardenier, N. Yeomans, Design guide for structural hollow section column connections, CIDECT (2004). [87] J. Wardenier, Semi-rigid connections between I-beams and tubular columns, Final Report, ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels (1995). [88] J. Rondal, K.G. Würker, D. Dutta, J. Wardenier, N. Yeomans, Structural stability of hollow sections, CIDECT Design Guide 2 (1992). [89] D. Dutta, J. Wardenier, N. Yeomans, K. Sakae, O. Bucak, J. A. Packer, Design guide for fabrication, assembly and erection of hollow section structures, CIDECT Design Guide 7 (1998). [90] Y. Kurobane, J. A. Packer, J. Wardenier, N. Yeomans, Design guide for structural hollow section column connections, CIDECT Design Guide 9 (2004). [91] J. A. Packer, D. R. Sherman, M. Lecce, Hollow structural section connections, Steel Design Guide 24, Steel Design Guide Ser. (2010) 153. [92] J. P. Jaspart, K. Weynand, Design of hollow section joints using the component method, Proceedings of 15th International Symposium on Tubular Structures, ISTS 2015, Rio Janeiro, Brazil (2015) 405–410. [93] K. Weynand, J. P. Jaspart, Application of the component method to joints between hollow and open sections, CIDECT project 5BM (2015). [94] J. P. Jaspart, C. Pietrapertosa, K. Weynand, E. Busse, R. Klinkhammer, J.P. Grimault, Development of a full consistent design approach for bolted and welded joints in building frames and trusses between steel members made of hollow and/or open sections - application of the component method volume 1 - practical guidelines, CIDECT Report : 5BP-4/05 (2005). [95] ANSI/AISC, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (2010). [96] AISC, Design Examples, Version 14.0 (2011). [97] S. Morino, K. Tsuda, Design and construction of concrete-filled steel tube column system in Japan, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology 4 (1) (2002) 51–73. [98] T. Fujimoto, E. Inai, M. Kai, K. Mori, O. Mori, I. Nishiyama, Behavior of beam-to-column connection of CFT column system, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2000) 1–8. [99] Tata Steel, Steel Construction Cost, The British Constructional Steelwork Association, Barrett, Byrd Associates (2013). [100] T. Fukumoto, K. Morita, Elastoplastic behavior of panel zone in steel beam-to-concrete filled steel tube column moment connections, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 131 (2005) 1841–1853. [101] I. Nishiyama, T. Fujimoto, T. Fukumoto, K. Yoshioka, Inelastic force-deformation response of joint shear panels in beam-column moment connections to concrete-filled tubes, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 130 (2004) 244–252. [102] I. Vayas, J. Ermopoulos, P. Thanopoulos, Failure of the roof of the archaeological site in Santorini/Greece, Stahlbau (2006). doi:10.1002/stab.200610034. [103] F. A. G. Fahad, C. M. A. Chauhdry, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin Stadium Roof Collapse, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia (Lack of Safety Issues) (2016) 34–43. [104] Y. M. Alostaz, S. P. Schneider, Connections to concrete-filled steel tubes, A Report on Research Sponsored by the National Science Foundation, NSF-CMS 93-00682 (1996). [105] W. Wang, Y. Chen, W. Li, R. Leon, Bidirectional seismic performance of steel beam to circular tubular column connections with outer diaphragm, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 40 (2010) 1063–1081. [106] A. B. Sabbagh, T. M. Chan, J.T. Mottram, Detailing of I-beam-to-CHS column joints with external diaphragm plates for seismic actions, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 88 (2013) 21–33. [107] J. F. Demonceau, V. L. Hoang, J. P. Jaspart, Performance-based approaches for high strength tubular columns and connections under earthquake and fire loadings, Final Report, RFSR CT-2008-00037, (2013). [108] V. L. Hoang, J. F. Demonceau, J. P. Jaspart, Proposal of a simplified analytical approach for the characterization of the end-plate component in circular tube connection, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 90 (2013) 245-252. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.031. [109] V. L. Hoang, J. F. Demonceau, J. P. Jaspart, Resistance of through-plate component in beam-to-column joints with circular hollow columns, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 92 (2014) 79–89. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.10.001. [110] A. E. Pournara, S. A. Karamanos, E. Mecozzi, A. Lucci, Structural resistance of high-strength steel CHS members, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 128 (2017) 152-165. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.08.003. [111] N. Tondini, V. L. Hoang, J. F. Demonceau, J. M. Franssen, Experimental and numerical investigation of high-strength steel circular columns subjected to fire, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 80 (2013) 57-81. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.09.001. [112] O.S. Bursi, A. Kumar, Design and integrity assessment of high strength tubular structures for extreme loading conditions, Final report RFSR-CT-2008-00035 (2013). [113] V. L. Hoang, J. P. Jaspart, J. F. Demonceau, Behaviour of bolted flange joints in tubular structures under monotonic, repeated and fatigue loadings I: Experimental tests, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 85 (2013) 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.02.011. [114] M. Feldmann, N. Schillo, S. Schaffrath, Rules on high strength steel, Final report RFSR-CT-2012-00036 (2016). [115] B. Somodi, B. Kövesdi, Residual stress measurements on cold-formed HSS hollow section columns, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 128 (2017) 706-720. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.10.008. [116] B. Somodi, B. Kövesdi, Flexural buckling resistance of cold-formed HSS hollow section members, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 128 (2017) 179-192. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.08.014. [117] S. R. Mirghaderi, S. Torabian, F. Keshavarzi, I-beam to box-column connection by a vertical plate passing through the column, Engineering Structures 32 (2010) 2034–2048. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.002. [118] S. Torabian, S. R. Mirghaderi, F. Keshavarzi, Moment-connection between I-beam and built-up square column by a diagonal through plate, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 70 (2012) 385-401. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.017. [119] A. P. Voth, J. A. Packer, Branch plate-to-circular hollow structural section connections. I: experimental investigation and finite-element modeling, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 138 (8) (2012) 1007–1018. Doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000545. [120] A. P. Voth, Branch plate-to-circular hollow structural section connections, Doctoral Thesis, 2010. [121] Y. M. Alostaz, S. P. Schneider, Analytical behavior of connections to concrete-filled steel tubes, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 40 (2) (1996) 95–127. [122] A. Elremaily and A. Azizinamini, Design provisions for connections between steel beams and concrete filled tube columns, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 57 (9) (2001) 971–995. [123] I. S. Sheet, U. Gunasekaran, G. A. MacRae, Experimental investigation of CFT column to steel beam connections under cyclic loading, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 86 (2013) 167-182. [124] A. Kanyilmaz, The problematic nature of steel hollow section joint fabrication, and a remedy using laser cutting technology: A review of research, applications, opportunities, Engineering Structures 183 (2019) 1027-1048. [125] EN ISO 9013, Thermal cutting - Classification of thermal cuts - Geometrical product specification and quality tolerances (ISO 9013:2002). [126] A. Lamikiz, E. Ukar, I. Tabernero, S. Martinez, Thermal advanced machining processes - A practical guideline, Modern Machining Technology (2011) 335-372. doi:10.1533/9780857094940. [127] A. Riveiro, F. Quintero, F. Lusquiños, R. Comesaña, J. Del Val, J. Pou, The role of the assist gas nature in laser cutting of aluminum alloys, Physics Procedia 12 (A) (2011) 548-554. doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.069. [128] C. L. Caristan, Laser cutting guide for manufacturing, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 2004. [129] L. Lin, M. Sobih, P.L. Crouse, Striation-free laser cutting of mild steel sheets, CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. (2007). doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.047. [130] BLM Group, All in one tube technology No: 16, Inspired Tube. (2012). [131] D. J. Thomas, Optimizing laser cut-edge durability for steel structures in high stress applications, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 121 (2016) 40–49. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.013. [132] F. Meurling, A. Melander, J. Linder, M. Larsson, The influence of mechanical and laser cutting on the fatigue strengths of carbon and stainless sheet steels, Scandinavian Journal of Metallurgy banner 30 (5) (2001) 309–319. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0692.2001.300506.x. [133] R. Moazed, R. Fotouhi, The influence of mechanical and laser cutting on the fatigue strengths of square hollow-section welded T-joints, Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 134 (3) (2012). [134] M. Harničárová, J. Zajac, A. Stoić, Comparison of different material cutting technologies in terms of their impact on the cutting quality of structural steel, Tech. Gaz. 17. (2010) 371–376. [135] D. Andrés, T. García, S. Cicero, R. Lacalle, J. A. Álvarez, A. Martín-Meizoso, J. Aldazabal, A. Bannister, A. Klimpel, Characterization of heat affected zones produced by thermal cutting processes by means of small punch tests, Mater. Charact. (2016). doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2016.07.017. [136] S. Herion, O. Fleischer, J. Hrabowski, S. Raso, A. Valli, A. Mastropasqua, E. Bononi, Laser tube cutting- Comparison of new types of K-joints and their SCF with standard solutions, Tubular Structures XVI - Heidarpour Zhao, Taylor & Francis (2018) 215–222. [137] R. Aloke, V. Girish, R. F. Scrutton, P. A. Molian, A model for prediction of dimensional tolerances of laser cut holes in mild steel thin plates, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 37 (8) (1997) 1069–1078. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(96)00090-9. [138] D. J. Thomas, M. T. Whittaker, G. W. Bright, Y. Gao, The influence of mechanical and CO2 laser cut-edge characteristics on the fatigue life performance of high strength automotive steels, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 211 (2) (2011) 263–274. [139] A. M. Orishich, A. G. Malikov, V. B. Shulyatyev, A. A. Golyshev, Experimental comparison of laser cutting of steel with fiber and CO2 lasers on the basis of minimal roughness, Physics Procedia (2014) 875–884. doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.106. [140] M. Baumeister, K. Dickmann, T. Hoult, Fiber laser micro-cutting of stainless steel sheets, Applied Physics A 85 (2) (2006) 121–124. doi:10.1007/s00339-006-3687-9. [141] A. Kanyilmaz, C. A. Castiglioni, Fabrication of laser cut I-beam-to-CHS-column steel joints with minimized welding, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 146 (2018) 16–32. [142] C. A. Castiglioni, A. Kanyilmaz, W. Salvatore, F. Morelli, A. Piscini, M. Hjiaj, M. Couchaux, L. Calado, J. M. Proença, B. Hoffmeister, J. Korndörfer, H. Bigelow, H. Degee, R. Das, S. Raso, A. Valli, M. Brugnolli, A. Galazzi, R. Hojda, EU-RFCS Project LASTEICON (Laser Technology for Innovative Joints in Steel Construction), (2016). www.lasteicon.eu. [143] C. W. Roeder, E. P. Popov, Eccentrically Braced Steel Frames for Earthquakes, ASCE Journal of Structural Division 104(3) (1978) 391-412. [144] T. Bogdan, A. Zona, G. Leoni, A. Dall’Asta, C. Braham, H. Degee, Design and performance of steel – concrete hybrid coupled shear walls in seismic conditions, COMPDYN 2013, 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Kos Island, Greece, June 12-14, 2013. [145] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance — Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. December 2004. [146] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures — Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. May 2005. [147] W. S. Park, H. D. Yun, Seismic behaviour and design of steel coupling beams in hybrid coupled shear wall systems, Nuclear Engineering and Design 236 (2006) 2474-2484. [148] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures — Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. December 2004. [149] Computers and Structures Inc., SAP2000 V15 Analysis Reference Manual, 2013. [150] Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356: Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Fema 356: Prepared by American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, November 2000. [151] American Institute of Steel Construction, AISC 341-16: Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. AISC 341-16: Prepared by American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois, December 2015. [152] I. Iervolino, C. Galasso, E. Cosenza, REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8(2) (2009) 339–362. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9146-1. [153] R. Das, A. Zona, B. Vandoren, H. Degee, Optimizing the coupling ratio of seismic resistant HCW systems with shear links, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 147 (2018) 393-407. [154] R. Das, A. Zona, B. Vandoren, H. Degee, Performance-based seismic design of an innovative HCW system with shear links based on IDA, EURODYN 2017, Procedia Engineering 199 (2017a) 3516-3521. [155] R. Das, A. Zona, B. Vandoren, H. Degee, Performance evaluation of an innovative HCW system with shear dissipative links. CE/papers 1, No. 2 & 3 (2017b), EUROSTEEL 2017, 13-15 September, Copenhagen, Denmark. [156] DIANA User’s Manual, DIANA Release 10.1, March 2017. [157] Fédération Internationale du béton, Comité euro-international du béton, Fédération Internationale de la précontrainte, Model code 2010: first complete draft, Fédération Internationale du béton, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010. [158] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures — Part 1–8: Design of Joints. May 2005. [159] R. Das, H. Degee, “Validation of numerical models for steel link-to-RC wall embedded connections”, CERG Internal Report, Hasselt, Belgium, September 2019. [160] R. Moazed, “Strength of Welded Thin-walled Square Hollow Section T-joint Connections by FE Simulations and Experiments”, Doctoral thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada, (2010). 23 [161] A. Azizinamini, Y. Shekar, M.A. Saadeghvaziri, “Design of through beam connection detail for circular composite columns”, Eng. Struct. 17 (1995) 209–213. Doi:10.1016/0141-0296(94)00002-B. [162] Final Document of prEN 1993-1-8. European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-8: Design of joints. July 2018. [163] J. Wardenier, “Hollow Sections in Structural Applications”, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, December 2001. [164] DIANA User’s Manual, Element Library. User’s Manual Release 9.5, February, 2014. [165] M. Couchaux, V. Vyhlas, M. Hjiaj, “RFCS Project LASTEICON Test Report: Tests on Joints C3 and C4”, INSA, Rennes, March 2019. [166] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures — Part 1–5: Plated Structural Elements. EN 1993-1-5, October 2006.
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29621
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002080
container_title Journal of Structural Engineering
container_volume 144
container_issue 7
container_start_page 04018082
_version_ 1766302719886229504
spelling ftunivhasselt:oai:documentserver.uhasselt.be:1942/29621 2023-05-15T14:28:33+02:00 EARTHQUAKE RESISTING POTENTIAL OF INNOVATIVE HYBRID COUPLED SHEAR WALLS WITH LASER-CUT OPEN-TO-CIRCULAR HOLLOW SECTION CONNECTIONS Das, Rajarshi Degée, Hervé 2019 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29621 en eng [1] T. Paulay, M. J. N. Priestley, Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, Wiley, New York (1992). [2] T. Paulay, Coupling beams of reinforced concrete shear walls, ASCE Journal of Structural Division 97 (3) (1971) 843–862. [3] T. Paulay, A. R. Santhakumar, Ductile behaviour of coupled shear walls, ASCE Journal of Structural Division 102 (1) (1976) 93–108. [4] B. Gong, K. A. Harries, B. M. Shahrooz, Behaviour and design of reinforced concrete, steel, and steel–concrete coupling beams, Earthquake Spectra 16 (4) (2000) 775–799. [5] W. S. Park, H. D. Yun, Seismic behaviour of coupling beams in a hybrid coupled shear walls, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 61 (11) (2005) 1492–1524. [6] S. El-Tawil, G. G. Deierlein, Nonlinear analyses of mixed steel-concrete moment frames. Part I - beam-column element formulation. Part II - implementation and verification, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 127 (6) (2001) 647-665. [7] S. El-Tawil, C. M. Kuenzli, M. Hassan, Pushover of hybrid coupled walls. Part I: design and modelling, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (10) (2002a) 1272-1281. [8] S. El-Tawil, C. M. Kuenzli, Pushover of hybrid coupled walls. Part II: analysis and behavior, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (10) (2002b) 1282-1289. [9] P. J. Fortney, B. M. Shahrooz, G. A. Rassati, Large scale testing of a replaceable ‘fuse’ steel coupling beam, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 133(12) (2007a). [10] P. J. Fortney, B. M. Shahrooz, G. A. Rassati, Seismic performance evaluation of coupled core walls with concrete and steel coupling beams, Journal of Steel and Composite Structures 7 (4) (2007b) 279-301. [11] P. J. Fortney, S. Noe, G. A. Rassati, B. M. Shahrooz, A steel-concrete composite solution for practical design of coupling beams, Steel Structures in Seismic Areas (2006a). [12] P. J. Fortney, The next generation of coupling beams, Doctoral Thesis, University of Cincinnati (2005). [13] B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, Steel-concrete composite coupling beams – behavior and design, Engineering Structures 23 (11) (2001a) 1480-1490. [14] B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, Concrete-steel composite coupling beams-Part I: component testing, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 127 (6) (2001b) 625-631. [15] B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, Concrete-steel composite coupling beams-Part II: subassembly testing and design verification, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 127 (6) (2001c) 632-637. [16] B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, A. J. Gillum, Cyclic response of composite coupling beams, ACI Special Publication 174 – Hybrid and Composite Structures (1998) 89-112. [17] K. A. Harries, B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, Behavior and design of reinforced concrete, steel, and steel-concrete coupling beams, Earthquake Spectra 16 (4) (2000) 775-799. [18] K. A. Harries, D. Mitchell, R. G. Redwood, W. D. Cook, Nonlinear seismic response predictions of walls coupled with steel and concrete beams, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 25 (5) (1998) 803-818. [19] K. A. Harries, D. Mitchell, W. D. Cook, R. G. Redwood, Seismic response of steel beams coupling reinforced concrete walls, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 119 (12) (1993) 3611-3629. [20] B. M. Shahrooz, M. A. Remmetter, F. Qin, Seismic response of composite coupled walls, Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete II, Proceedings paper (1992) 429-441. [21] B. M. Shahrooz, M. E. Remmetter, F. Qin, Seismic design and performance of composite coupled walls, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 119 (11) (1993) 3291-3309. [22] B. M. Shahrooz, J. T. Deason, G. Tunc, Outrigger beam – wall connections: part i component testing and development of design model, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 30 (2) (2004a) 253-261. [23] B. M. Shahrooz, G. Tunc, J. T. Deason, Outrigger beam – wall connections: part ii-subassembly testing and further modeling enhancements, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 130 (2) (2004b) 262-270. [24] B. M. Shahrooz, B. Gong B, G. Tunc, J. D. Deason, An overview of reinforced concrete core wall-steel frame hybrid structures, Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 3 (2) (2001) 149-158. [25] G. Xuan, B. M. Shahrooz, Performance based design of a 15 story reinforced concrete coupled core wall structure, Report No. UC-CII 05/03, Cincinnati Infrastructure Institute (2005). [26] A. Dall'Asta, A. Zona, G. Leoni, T. Bogdan, Innovative hybrid and composite steel–concrete structural solutions for building in seismic area, Final Report, EUR 26932 EN, European Commission, 2015http://dx.doi.org/10.2777/85404 (2015). [27] A. Zona, H. Degee, G. Leoni, A. Dall’Asta, A., Ductile design of innovative steel and concrete hybrid coupled walls, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 117 (2016) 204–213. [28] ACI 318-08 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills MI (2011). [29] M. Hassan, Inelastic dynamic behavior and design of hybrid coupled wall systems, Doctoral thesis, University of Central Florida (2004). [30] T. Paulay, A displacement-focused seismic design of mixed building systems, Earthquake Spectra 18 (4) (2002) 689- 718. [31] FEMA-306 Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC (1998). [32] K. A. Harries, Ductility and deformability of coupling beams in reinforced concrete coupled walls, Earthquake Spectra 17 (3) (2001) 457-478. [33] K. A. Harries, B. M. Shahrooz, Hybrid coupled wall systems, Concrete International 27 (5) (2005) 45-51. [34] K. A. Harries, D. Mitchell, R. G. Redwood, W. D. Cook, Seismic design of coupling beams - a case for mixed construction, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 24 (3) (1997) 448-459. [35] S. El-Tawil, P. J. Fortney, K. A. Harries, B. M. Shahrooz, Y. Kurama, M. Hassan, X. Tong, Recommendations for seismic design of hybrid coupled wall systems, ASCE/SEI (2009). [36] M. D. Engelhardt, E. P. Popov, On design of eccentrically braced frames, Earthquake Spectra 5 (3) (1989) 495-511. [37] A. Zona, L. Tassotti, G. Leoni, A. Dall’Asta, Nonlinear seismic response analysis of an innovative steel-and-concrete hybrid coupled wall system, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 144(7) (2018). DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002080. [38] A. K. W. Lim, The nonlinear response of reinforced concrete coupling slabs with drop panels in earthquake resisting shear wall structures, Master’s Thesis, McGill University (1989). [39] S. El Tawil, K. A. Harries, P. J. Fortney, B. M. Shahrooz, Seismic design of hybrid coupled wall systems: state of the art, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 136 (7) (2010). [40] K. A. Harries, D. S. McNeice, Performance-based design of high-rise coupled wall systems, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Structures 15 (3) (2006) 289-306. [41] K. A. Harries, D. Moulton, R. Clemson, Parametric study of coupled wall behavior – implications for the design of coupling beams, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 130 (3) (2004) 480-488. [42] A. E. Aktan, V. V. Bertero, Conceptual seismic design of frame-wall structures, Journal of Structural Engineering 110 (11) (1984) 2778–2797. [43] G. Xuan, B. M. Shahrooz, K. A. Harries, G. A. Rassati, A performance-based design approach for coupled core wall systems with diagonally reinforced concrete coupling beams, Advances in Structural Engineering 11 (3) (2008). [44] V. V. Bertero, J. C. Anderson, H. Krawinkler, E. Miranda, and the CUREE and Kajima Research Teams, Design guidelines for ductility and drift limits, Report No. UCB/EERC-91/15, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, CA (1991). [45] ASCE 7-10 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston VA (2010). [46] B. Gong, B. M. Shahrooz, Seismic behavior and design of composite coupled wall systems, Report No. UC-CII 98/01, Cincinnati Infrastructure Institute, Cincinnati, OH (1998). [47] L. Chitty, On the cantilever composed of a number of parallel beams interconnected by cross bars, London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 83 (1947) 685-699. [48] I. A. MacLeod, Lateral stiffness of shear walls with openings in tall buildings, Symposium in Tall Buildings, Pergamon Press, Oxford, (1967) 223-244. [49] J. Schwaighofer, Analysis of shear wall structures using standard computer programs, ACI Proceedings 66 (12) 1969. [50] R. W. Furlong, Effective stiffness of composite shear walls, Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete, ASCE Proceedings of an Engineering Foundation Conference 5(3) (1996) 250-257. [51] ACI, Earthquake Effects on Reinforced Concrete Structures, US-Japan Cooperative Earthquake Research Program, ACI Special Publication SP-84, American Concrete Institute, Detroit (1984). [52] S. Okamoto, S. Nakata, Y. Kitagawa, M. Yoshimura, T. Kaminosono, A progress report on the full scale seismic experiment of a seven-story reinforced concrete building- part of the US-Japan cooperative program, B.R.I Research Paper No. 94, Building Research Institute, Ministry of Construction, Japan, (1985). [53] T. Kabeyasawa, H. Shiohara, S. Otani, H. Aoyama, Analysis of full scale seven-story reinforced concrete test structure: Test PSD-3, Proceedings of 3rd Joint Technical Coordinating Committee, US-Japan Cooperative Earthquake Research Program, Building Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan (1982). [54] ANSI/AISC 325-11- Steel Construction Manual, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago (2011). [55] K. A. Harries, P. J. Fortney, B. M. Shahrooz, P. Brienen, Design of practical diagonally reinforced concrete coupling beams – A critical review of ACI 318 requirements, ACI Structures Journal 102 (6) (2005) 876-882. [56] FEMA-350, Recommended Seismic Design Criteria For New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C (2000). [57] FEMA-356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Reston, Virginia, (2000). [58] K. D. Hjelmstad, E. P. Popov, Seismic behavior of active beam links in eccentrically braced frames, Report No. UCB/EERC-83/15, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA (1983). [59] J. O. Malley, E. P. Popov, Design considerations for shear links in eccentrically brace frames, Report No. UCB/EERC-83/24, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA (1983). [60] K. Kasai, E. P. Popov, A study of seismically resistant eccentrically braced steel frame systems, Report No. UCB/EERC-86/01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA (1986a). [61] K. Kasai, E. P. Popov, General behavior of WF steel shear link beams, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 112 (2) (1986b) 362-382. [62] K. Kasai, E. P. Popov, Cyclic web buckling control for shear link beams, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 112 (3) (1986c) 505-521. [63] J. Ricles, E. P. Popov, Dynamic analysis of seismically resistant EBFs, Report No. UCB/EERC-87/07, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA (1987b). [64] T. Balendra, M. T. Sam, C. Y. Liaw, S. L. Lee, Preliminary studies into the behavior of knee braced frames subject to seismic loading, Engineering Structures 13 (1) (1991) 67-74. [65] D. C. Rai, B.J. Wallace, Aluminum shear-links for enhanced seismic resistance, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 27 (4) (1998) 315-342. [66] A. Ghobarah, H.A. Elfath, Rehabilitation of a reinforced concrete frame using eccentric steel bracing, Engineering Structures 23 (7) (2001) 745-755. [67] C. C. McDaniel, C. M. Uang, F. Seible, Cyclic testing of built-up steel shear links for the new bay bridge, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 129(6) (2003) 801-809. [68] K. Marcakis, D. Mitchell, Precast concrete connections with embedded steel members, Journal Prestressed Concrete Institute, 25 (4) (1980) 86-116. [69] A. H. Mattock, G. H. Gaafar, Strength of embedded steel sections as brackets, ACI Journal 79 (9) (1982) 83-93. [70] L. B. Kriz, C. H. Raths, Connection in precast concrete structures – shear strength of column heads, Journal Prestressed Concrete Institute 8 (6) (1963) 45–75. [71] D. C. Kent, R. Park, Flexural members with confined concrete, ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, 97 (ST7) (1971) 1969–90. [72] K. Minami, Beam to Column stress transfer in composite structures, Composite and mixed construction, Proceeding paper, New York (1985). [73] C. H. Raths, Embedded structural steel connections, PCI Committee on Connection Details, PCI Manual on Design of Connections for Precast Prestressed Concrete, Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, 104-112 (1973). [74] W. S. Park, H. D. Yun, Seismic behaviour of steel coupling beams linking reinforced concrete shear walls, Engineering Structures 27 (2004) 1024–1039. [75] G. G. Deierlein, Design of Moment Connections for Composite Framed Structures, Doctoral Thesis, University of Texas at Austin (1988). [76] G. G. Deierlein, T. M. Sheikh, J. A. Yura, J. O. Jirsa, Beam-column moment connections for composite frames: Part 2, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering. 115 (11) (1989) 2877-2896. [77] ASCE Task Committee on Design Criteria for Composite Structures in Steel and Concrete, Guidelines for Design of Joints between Steel Beams and Reinforced Concrete Columns, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 120 (8) (1994) 2330-2357. [78] C. J. Motter, Large-scale testing of steel-reinforced concrete (src) coupling beams embedded into reinforced concrete structural walls, Doctoral Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (2014). [79] BLM Group, All in one tube technology no: 20, Inspired Tube. (2015). [80] O.S. Bursi, Prefabricated composite beam-to-column filled tube or partially reinforced-concrete encased column connections for severe seismic and fire loadings, RFSR-CT-2003-00034, Final Report, (2009). [81] J. Wardenier, J. A. Packer, X. L. Zhao, G. J. Van der Vegte, Hollow sections in structural applications, CIDECT, Geneva, Switzerland (2010). [82] J. Wardenier, Y. Kurobane, J. A. Packer, G. J. van der Vegte, X.-L. Zhao, Design guide for circular hollow section (CHS) joints under predominantly static loading, CIDECT Design Guide 1 (2008). [83] L. Twilit, R. Hass, W. Klingsch, M. Edwards, D. Dutta, Design guide for structural hollow section columns exposed to fire, CIDECT (1994). [84] J. F. Demonceau, V. L. Hoang, J. P. Jaspart, Performance-based approaches for high strength tubular columns and connections under earthquake and fire loadings, Final Report, RFSR CT-2008-00037 (2013). [85] L. Simões da Silva, A. Santiago, F. Lopes, Design of composite joints for improved fire robustness, Final Report RFSR-CT-2009-00021 (2014). [86] Y. Kurobane, J. A. Packer, J. Wardenier, N. Yeomans, Design guide for structural hollow section column connections, CIDECT (2004). [87] J. Wardenier, Semi-rigid connections between I-beams and tubular columns, Final Report, ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels (1995). [88] J. Rondal, K.G. Würker, D. Dutta, J. Wardenier, N. Yeomans, Structural stability of hollow sections, CIDECT Design Guide 2 (1992). [89] D. Dutta, J. Wardenier, N. Yeomans, K. Sakae, O. Bucak, J. A. Packer, Design guide for fabrication, assembly and erection of hollow section structures, CIDECT Design Guide 7 (1998). [90] Y. Kurobane, J. A. Packer, J. Wardenier, N. Yeomans, Design guide for structural hollow section column connections, CIDECT Design Guide 9 (2004). [91] J. A. Packer, D. R. Sherman, M. Lecce, Hollow structural section connections, Steel Design Guide 24, Steel Design Guide Ser. (2010) 153. [92] J. P. Jaspart, K. Weynand, Design of hollow section joints using the component method, Proceedings of 15th International Symposium on Tubular Structures, ISTS 2015, Rio Janeiro, Brazil (2015) 405–410. [93] K. Weynand, J. P. Jaspart, Application of the component method to joints between hollow and open sections, CIDECT project 5BM (2015). [94] J. P. Jaspart, C. Pietrapertosa, K. Weynand, E. Busse, R. Klinkhammer, J.P. Grimault, Development of a full consistent design approach for bolted and welded joints in building frames and trusses between steel members made of hollow and/or open sections - application of the component method volume 1 - practical guidelines, CIDECT Report : 5BP-4/05 (2005). [95] ANSI/AISC, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (2010). [96] AISC, Design Examples, Version 14.0 (2011). [97] S. Morino, K. Tsuda, Design and construction of concrete-filled steel tube column system in Japan, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology 4 (1) (2002) 51–73. [98] T. Fujimoto, E. Inai, M. Kai, K. Mori, O. Mori, I. Nishiyama, Behavior of beam-to-column connection of CFT column system, 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2000) 1–8. [99] Tata Steel, Steel Construction Cost, The British Constructional Steelwork Association, Barrett, Byrd Associates (2013). [100] T. Fukumoto, K. Morita, Elastoplastic behavior of panel zone in steel beam-to-concrete filled steel tube column moment connections, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 131 (2005) 1841–1853. [101] I. Nishiyama, T. Fujimoto, T. Fukumoto, K. Yoshioka, Inelastic force-deformation response of joint shear panels in beam-column moment connections to concrete-filled tubes, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 130 (2004) 244–252. [102] I. Vayas, J. Ermopoulos, P. Thanopoulos, Failure of the roof of the archaeological site in Santorini/Greece, Stahlbau (2006). doi:10.1002/stab.200610034. [103] F. A. G. Fahad, C. M. A. Chauhdry, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin Stadium Roof Collapse, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia (Lack of Safety Issues) (2016) 34–43. [104] Y. M. Alostaz, S. P. Schneider, Connections to concrete-filled steel tubes, A Report on Research Sponsored by the National Science Foundation, NSF-CMS 93-00682 (1996). [105] W. Wang, Y. Chen, W. Li, R. Leon, Bidirectional seismic performance of steel beam to circular tubular column connections with outer diaphragm, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 40 (2010) 1063–1081. [106] A. B. Sabbagh, T. M. Chan, J.T. Mottram, Detailing of I-beam-to-CHS column joints with external diaphragm plates for seismic actions, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 88 (2013) 21–33. [107] J. F. Demonceau, V. L. Hoang, J. P. Jaspart, Performance-based approaches for high strength tubular columns and connections under earthquake and fire loadings, Final Report, RFSR CT-2008-00037, (2013). [108] V. L. Hoang, J. F. Demonceau, J. P. Jaspart, Proposal of a simplified analytical approach for the characterization of the end-plate component in circular tube connection, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 90 (2013) 245-252. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.031. [109] V. L. Hoang, J. F. Demonceau, J. P. Jaspart, Resistance of through-plate component in beam-to-column joints with circular hollow columns, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 92 (2014) 79–89. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.10.001. [110] A. E. Pournara, S. A. Karamanos, E. Mecozzi, A. Lucci, Structural resistance of high-strength steel CHS members, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 128 (2017) 152-165. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.08.003. [111] N. Tondini, V. L. Hoang, J. F. Demonceau, J. M. Franssen, Experimental and numerical investigation of high-strength steel circular columns subjected to fire, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 80 (2013) 57-81. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.09.001. [112] O.S. Bursi, A. Kumar, Design and integrity assessment of high strength tubular structures for extreme loading conditions, Final report RFSR-CT-2008-00035 (2013). [113] V. L. Hoang, J. P. Jaspart, J. F. Demonceau, Behaviour of bolted flange joints in tubular structures under monotonic, repeated and fatigue loadings I: Experimental tests, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 85 (2013) 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.02.011. [114] M. Feldmann, N. Schillo, S. Schaffrath, Rules on high strength steel, Final report RFSR-CT-2012-00036 (2016). [115] B. Somodi, B. Kövesdi, Residual stress measurements on cold-formed HSS hollow section columns, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 128 (2017) 706-720. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.10.008. [116] B. Somodi, B. Kövesdi, Flexural buckling resistance of cold-formed HSS hollow section members, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 128 (2017) 179-192. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.08.014. [117] S. R. Mirghaderi, S. Torabian, F. Keshavarzi, I-beam to box-column connection by a vertical plate passing through the column, Engineering Structures 32 (2010) 2034–2048. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.002. [118] S. Torabian, S. R. Mirghaderi, F. Keshavarzi, Moment-connection between I-beam and built-up square column by a diagonal through plate, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 70 (2012) 385-401. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.017. [119] A. P. Voth, J. A. Packer, Branch plate-to-circular hollow structural section connections. I: experimental investigation and finite-element modeling, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 138 (8) (2012) 1007–1018. Doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000545. [120] A. P. Voth, Branch plate-to-circular hollow structural section connections, Doctoral Thesis, 2010. [121] Y. M. Alostaz, S. P. Schneider, Analytical behavior of connections to concrete-filled steel tubes, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 40 (2) (1996) 95–127. [122] A. Elremaily and A. Azizinamini, Design provisions for connections between steel beams and concrete filled tube columns, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 57 (9) (2001) 971–995. [123] I. S. Sheet, U. Gunasekaran, G. A. MacRae, Experimental investigation of CFT column to steel beam connections under cyclic loading, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 86 (2013) 167-182. [124] A. Kanyilmaz, The problematic nature of steel hollow section joint fabrication, and a remedy using laser cutting technology: A review of research, applications, opportunities, Engineering Structures 183 (2019) 1027-1048. [125] EN ISO 9013, Thermal cutting - Classification of thermal cuts - Geometrical product specification and quality tolerances (ISO 9013:2002). [126] A. Lamikiz, E. Ukar, I. Tabernero, S. Martinez, Thermal advanced machining processes - A practical guideline, Modern Machining Technology (2011) 335-372. doi:10.1533/9780857094940. [127] A. Riveiro, F. Quintero, F. Lusquiños, R. Comesaña, J. Del Val, J. Pou, The role of the assist gas nature in laser cutting of aluminum alloys, Physics Procedia 12 (A) (2011) 548-554. doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.069. [128] C. L. Caristan, Laser cutting guide for manufacturing, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 2004. [129] L. Lin, M. Sobih, P.L. Crouse, Striation-free laser cutting of mild steel sheets, CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. (2007). doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.047. [130] BLM Group, All in one tube technology No: 16, Inspired Tube. (2012). [131] D. J. Thomas, Optimizing laser cut-edge durability for steel structures in high stress applications, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 121 (2016) 40–49. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.013. [132] F. Meurling, A. Melander, J. Linder, M. Larsson, The influence of mechanical and laser cutting on the fatigue strengths of carbon and stainless sheet steels, Scandinavian Journal of Metallurgy banner 30 (5) (2001) 309–319. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0692.2001.300506.x. [133] R. Moazed, R. Fotouhi, The influence of mechanical and laser cutting on the fatigue strengths of square hollow-section welded T-joints, Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 134 (3) (2012). [134] M. Harničárová, J. Zajac, A. Stoić, Comparison of different material cutting technologies in terms of their impact on the cutting quality of structural steel, Tech. Gaz. 17. (2010) 371–376. [135] D. Andrés, T. García, S. Cicero, R. Lacalle, J. A. Álvarez, A. Martín-Meizoso, J. Aldazabal, A. Bannister, A. Klimpel, Characterization of heat affected zones produced by thermal cutting processes by means of small punch tests, Mater. Charact. (2016). doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2016.07.017. [136] S. Herion, O. Fleischer, J. Hrabowski, S. Raso, A. Valli, A. Mastropasqua, E. Bononi, Laser tube cutting- Comparison of new types of K-joints and their SCF with standard solutions, Tubular Structures XVI - Heidarpour Zhao, Taylor & Francis (2018) 215–222. [137] R. Aloke, V. Girish, R. F. Scrutton, P. A. Molian, A model for prediction of dimensional tolerances of laser cut holes in mild steel thin plates, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 37 (8) (1997) 1069–1078. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(96)00090-9. [138] D. J. Thomas, M. T. Whittaker, G. W. Bright, Y. Gao, The influence of mechanical and CO2 laser cut-edge characteristics on the fatigue life performance of high strength automotive steels, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 211 (2) (2011) 263–274. [139] A. M. Orishich, A. G. Malikov, V. B. Shulyatyev, A. A. Golyshev, Experimental comparison of laser cutting of steel with fiber and CO2 lasers on the basis of minimal roughness, Physics Procedia (2014) 875–884. doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.106. [140] M. Baumeister, K. Dickmann, T. Hoult, Fiber laser micro-cutting of stainless steel sheets, Applied Physics A 85 (2) (2006) 121–124. doi:10.1007/s00339-006-3687-9. [141] A. Kanyilmaz, C. A. Castiglioni, Fabrication of laser cut I-beam-to-CHS-column steel joints with minimized welding, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 146 (2018) 16–32. [142] C. A. Castiglioni, A. Kanyilmaz, W. Salvatore, F. Morelli, A. Piscini, M. Hjiaj, M. Couchaux, L. Calado, J. M. Proença, B. Hoffmeister, J. Korndörfer, H. Bigelow, H. Degee, R. Das, S. Raso, A. Valli, M. Brugnolli, A. Galazzi, R. Hojda, EU-RFCS Project LASTEICON (Laser Technology for Innovative Joints in Steel Construction), (2016). www.lasteicon.eu. [143] C. W. Roeder, E. P. Popov, Eccentrically Braced Steel Frames for Earthquakes, ASCE Journal of Structural Division 104(3) (1978) 391-412. [144] T. Bogdan, A. Zona, G. Leoni, A. Dall’Asta, C. Braham, H. Degee, Design and performance of steel – concrete hybrid coupled shear walls in seismic conditions, COMPDYN 2013, 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Kos Island, Greece, June 12-14, 2013. [145] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance — Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. December 2004. [146] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures — Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. May 2005. [147] W. S. Park, H. D. Yun, Seismic behaviour and design of steel coupling beams in hybrid coupled shear wall systems, Nuclear Engineering and Design 236 (2006) 2474-2484. [148] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures — Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. December 2004. [149] Computers and Structures Inc., SAP2000 V15 Analysis Reference Manual, 2013. [150] Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356: Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Fema 356: Prepared by American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, November 2000. [151] American Institute of Steel Construction, AISC 341-16: Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. AISC 341-16: Prepared by American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois, December 2015. [152] I. Iervolino, C. Galasso, E. Cosenza, REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8(2) (2009) 339–362. doi:10.1007/s10518-009-9146-1. [153] R. Das, A. Zona, B. Vandoren, H. Degee, Optimizing the coupling ratio of seismic resistant HCW systems with shear links, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 147 (2018) 393-407. [154] R. Das, A. Zona, B. Vandoren, H. Degee, Performance-based seismic design of an innovative HCW system with shear links based on IDA, EURODYN 2017, Procedia Engineering 199 (2017a) 3516-3521. [155] R. Das, A. Zona, B. Vandoren, H. Degee, Performance evaluation of an innovative HCW system with shear dissipative links. CE/papers 1, No. 2 & 3 (2017b), EUROSTEEL 2017, 13-15 September, Copenhagen, Denmark. [156] DIANA User’s Manual, DIANA Release 10.1, March 2017. [157] Fédération Internationale du béton, Comité euro-international du béton, Fédération Internationale de la précontrainte, Model code 2010: first complete draft, Fédération Internationale du béton, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010. [158] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures — Part 1–8: Design of Joints. May 2005. [159] R. Das, H. Degee, “Validation of numerical models for steel link-to-RC wall embedded connections”, CERG Internal Report, Hasselt, Belgium, September 2019. [160] R. Moazed, “Strength of Welded Thin-walled Square Hollow Section T-joint Connections by FE Simulations and Experiments”, Doctoral thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada, (2010). 23 [161] A. Azizinamini, Y. Shekar, M.A. Saadeghvaziri, “Design of through beam connection detail for circular composite columns”, Eng. Struct. 17 (1995) 209–213. Doi:10.1016/0141-0296(94)00002-B. [162] Final Document of prEN 1993-1-8. European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-8: Design of joints. July 2018. [163] J. Wardenier, “Hollow Sections in Structural Applications”, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands, December 2001. [164] DIANA User’s Manual, Element Library. User’s Manual Release 9.5, February, 2014. [165] M. Couchaux, V. Vyhlas, M. Hjiaj, “RFCS Project LASTEICON Test Report: Tests on Joints C3 and C4”, INSA, Rennes, March 2019. [166] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures — Part 1–5: Plated Structural Elements. EN 1993-1-5, October 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1942/29621 info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess Steel-concrete hybrid structures Shear links Seismic-resistant structures Steel and concrete hybrid connections Embedment length Embedded steel sections Beam-to-CHS-column connection Tubular structures CHS joints Hollow section joints Through Beam connections Passing-through joints info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis 2019 ftunivhasselt https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002080 2022-08-11T12:27:48Z Although conventional reinforced concrete (RC) or hybrid coupled wall (HCW) structures have been used for a number of years as earthquake resistant system in high to moderate seismic areas thanks to their lateral strength, stiffness, and energy dissipation characteristics, some drawbacks such as expensive detailing, costly foundations, large overall weight of the system, difficult restoration works etc. have limited their paramount potential from a structural as well as an economic perspective. In order to minimize these drawbacks and make further advancement, an innovative HCW system is proposed in this thesis consisting of a single RC wall coupled with two steel side circular hollow section (CHS) columns via steel coupling shear critical beams. The RC wall carries almost all the horizontal shear force while the overturning moments are partially resisted by an axial compression-tension couple developed by the two CHS columns rather than by the individual flexural action of the wall alone. The steel coupling beams are bolted to a steel profile either partly embedded in the RC wall or passing through it. Optimized procedures were developed to design both type of connections in an economically efficient manner and also ensuring that the damage always occurs in the steel shear beams (fuses) prior to any damage in the RC wall in general and in the connection zone in particular. Furthermore, this thesis introduces and investigates different types of innovative I-beam-to-CHS-column “passing-through” connections which minimizes the limitations in the existing (or conventional) beam-to-CHS column connections and therefore promote their use in the modern steel industry. Standard design guidelines have thus been developed in accordance with Eurocode provisions for gravitational and earthquake loading scenarios to calculate the ultimate resistances of such joints and are discussed with nonlinear FE simulations verified through experimental results. They are also compared with conventional (direct weld) joints to highlight ... Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis Arctic Document Server@UHasselt (Hasselt University) Journal of Structural Engineering 144 7 04018082

Similar Items