Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project.

Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remediation Journal
Main Authors: Cundy, Andy B., Bardos, Paul, Puschenreiter, Markus, Witters, Nele, Mench, Michel, Bert, Valérie, Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang, Müller, Ingo, Weyens, Nele, Vangronsveld, Jaco
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21353
https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435
https://www.academia.edu/13898652/Developing_principles_of_sustainability_and_stakeholder_engagement_for_gentle_remediation_approaches_The_European_context
id ftunivhasselt:oai:documentserver.uhasselt.be:1942/21353
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivhasselt:oai:documentserver.uhasselt.be:1942/21353 2023-05-15T16:28:43+02:00 Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project. Cundy, Andy B. Bardos, Paul Puschenreiter, Markus Witters, Nele Mench, Michel Bert, Valérie Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang Müller, Ingo Weyens, Nele Vangronsveld, Jaco 2015 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21353 https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435 https://www.academia.edu/13898652/Developing_principles_of_sustainability_and_stakeholder_engagement_for_gentle_remediation_approaches_The_European_context en eng Remediation Journal, 25 (3), p. 101-114 1520-6831 http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21353 114 3 101 25 doi:10.1002/rem.21435 000216056000007 https://www.academia.edu/13898652/Developing_principles_of_sustainability_and_stakeholder_engagement_for_gentle_remediation_approaches_The_European_context © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2015 ftunivhasselt https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435 2022-08-11T12:26:37Z Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based methods, with or without chemical soil additives or amendments, for reducing contaminant transfer to local receptors by in situ stabilization, or extraction, transformation, or degradation of contaminants. Despite offering strong benefits in terms of risk management, deployment costs, and sustainability for a range of site problems, the application of GRO as practical on-site remedial solutions is still in its relative infancy, particularly for metal(loid)-contaminated sites. A key barrier to wider adoption of GRO relates to general uncertainties and lack of stakeholder confidence in (and indeed knowledge of) the feasibility or reliability of GRO as practical risk management solutions. The GREENLAND project has therefore developed a simple and transparent decision support framework for promoting the appropriate use of gentle remediation options and encouraging participation of stakeholders, supplemented by a set of specific design aids for use when GRO appear to be a viable option. The framework is presented as a three phased model or Decision Support Tool (DST), in the form of a Microsoft Excel-based workbook, designed to inform decision-making and options appraisal during the selection of remedial approaches for contaminated sites. The DST acts as a simple decision support and stakeholder engagement tool for the application of GRO, providing a context for GRO application (particularly where soft end-use of remediated land is envisaged), quick reference tables (including an economic cost calculator), and supporting information and technical guidance drawing on practical examples of effective GRO application at trace metal(loid) contaminated sites across Europe. This article introduces the decision support framework. ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland Document Server@UHasselt (Hasselt University) Greenland Remediation Journal 25 3 101 114
institution Open Polar
collection Document Server@UHasselt (Hasselt University)
op_collection_id ftunivhasselt
language English
description Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based methods, with or without chemical soil additives or amendments, for reducing contaminant transfer to local receptors by in situ stabilization, or extraction, transformation, or degradation of contaminants. Despite offering strong benefits in terms of risk management, deployment costs, and sustainability for a range of site problems, the application of GRO as practical on-site remedial solutions is still in its relative infancy, particularly for metal(loid)-contaminated sites. A key barrier to wider adoption of GRO relates to general uncertainties and lack of stakeholder confidence in (and indeed knowledge of) the feasibility or reliability of GRO as practical risk management solutions. The GREENLAND project has therefore developed a simple and transparent decision support framework for promoting the appropriate use of gentle remediation options and encouraging participation of stakeholders, supplemented by a set of specific design aids for use when GRO appear to be a viable option. The framework is presented as a three phased model or Decision Support Tool (DST), in the form of a Microsoft Excel-based workbook, designed to inform decision-making and options appraisal during the selection of remedial approaches for contaminated sites. The DST acts as a simple decision support and stakeholder engagement tool for the application of GRO, providing a context for GRO application (particularly where soft end-use of remediated land is envisaged), quick reference tables (including an economic cost calculator), and supporting information and technical guidance drawing on practical examples of effective GRO application at trace metal(loid) contaminated sites across Europe. This article introduces the decision support framework. ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cundy, Andy B.
Bardos, Paul
Puschenreiter, Markus
Witters, Nele
Mench, Michel
Bert, Valérie
Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang
Müller, Ingo
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, Jaco
spellingShingle Cundy, Andy B.
Bardos, Paul
Puschenreiter, Markus
Witters, Nele
Mench, Michel
Bert, Valérie
Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang
Müller, Ingo
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, Jaco
Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project.
author_facet Cundy, Andy B.
Bardos, Paul
Puschenreiter, Markus
Witters, Nele
Mench, Michel
Bert, Valérie
Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang
Müller, Ingo
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, Jaco
author_sort Cundy, Andy B.
title Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project.
title_short Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project.
title_full Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project.
title_fullStr Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project.
title_full_unstemmed Developing Effective Decision Support for the Application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project.
title_sort developing effective decision support for the application of “gentle” remediation options: the greenland project.
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21353
https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435
https://www.academia.edu/13898652/Developing_principles_of_sustainability_and_stakeholder_engagement_for_gentle_remediation_approaches_The_European_context
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_relation Remediation Journal, 25 (3), p. 101-114
1520-6831
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21353
114
3
101
25
doi:10.1002/rem.21435
000216056000007
https://www.academia.edu/13898652/Developing_principles_of_sustainability_and_stakeholder_engagement_for_gentle_remediation_approaches_The_European_context
op_rights © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435
container_title Remediation Journal
container_volume 25
container_issue 3
container_start_page 101
op_container_end_page 114
_version_ 1766018390768484352