Parlamentarisme i norske fylkeskommuner bedre styring og demokrati?

Parlamentarism in Norwegian counties better management and democracy? Since the establishment of the modern county in Norway in 1976, county government has been managed according to the alderman principle, which is characterized by proportional election of parties to the executive board. However, in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saxi, Hans Petter
Other Authors: Høgskolan i Bodø
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Norwegian
Published: Kommunforskning i Västsverige 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2077/22163
id ftunivgoeteborg:oai:gupea.ub.gu.se:2077/22163
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivgoeteborg:oai:gupea.ub.gu.se:2077/22163 2023-10-29T02:38:03+01:00 Parlamentarisme i norske fylkeskommuner bedre styring og demokrati? Saxi, Hans Petter Høgskolan i Bodø 2009 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2077/22163 nor nor Kommunforskning i Västsverige http://hdl.handle.net/2077/22163 Parlamentarism Regionalpolitik Norge Text article, peer reviewed scientific 2009 ftunivgoeteborg 2023-10-04T21:08:44Z Parlamentarism in Norwegian counties better management and democracy? Since the establishment of the modern county in Norway in 1976, county government has been managed according to the alderman principle, which is characterized by proportional election of parties to the executive board. However, in 1999 the county of Nordland introduced the parliamentary principle, and three other counties, Hedmark, Nord-Trøndelag and Troms, followed suit in 2003. A core element in parliamentarian government is that the cabinet is elected by a majoritarian vote. The effects of parliamentarism at the county level have been majority rule. A majority of the county representatives states that the goals for the reform are realised and there is an increase in support for parliamentarism as a management model. Furthermore, many opposition politicians experience it as being less meaningful and useful to participate in county politics after the introduction of parliamentarism. This is due to the parties in power being given greater resources and capacity, and that politics have taken on a more closed form. There are not any measurable external effects of the new parliamentarian system, like turnouts and the citizens knowledge and trust on the counties. All in all, introduction of parliamentarism at the county level has resulted in management improvements, but not in a better democracy. Article in Journal/Newspaper Nordland Nordland Nordland Troms University of Gothenburg: GUPEA (Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive)
institution Open Polar
collection University of Gothenburg: GUPEA (Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive)
op_collection_id ftunivgoeteborg
language Norwegian
topic Parlamentarism
Regionalpolitik
Norge
spellingShingle Parlamentarism
Regionalpolitik
Norge
Saxi, Hans Petter
Parlamentarisme i norske fylkeskommuner bedre styring og demokrati?
topic_facet Parlamentarism
Regionalpolitik
Norge
description Parlamentarism in Norwegian counties better management and democracy? Since the establishment of the modern county in Norway in 1976, county government has been managed according to the alderman principle, which is characterized by proportional election of parties to the executive board. However, in 1999 the county of Nordland introduced the parliamentary principle, and three other counties, Hedmark, Nord-Trøndelag and Troms, followed suit in 2003. A core element in parliamentarian government is that the cabinet is elected by a majoritarian vote. The effects of parliamentarism at the county level have been majority rule. A majority of the county representatives states that the goals for the reform are realised and there is an increase in support for parliamentarism as a management model. Furthermore, many opposition politicians experience it as being less meaningful and useful to participate in county politics after the introduction of parliamentarism. This is due to the parties in power being given greater resources and capacity, and that politics have taken on a more closed form. There are not any measurable external effects of the new parliamentarian system, like turnouts and the citizens knowledge and trust on the counties. All in all, introduction of parliamentarism at the county level has resulted in management improvements, but not in a better democracy.
author2 Høgskolan i Bodø
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Saxi, Hans Petter
author_facet Saxi, Hans Petter
author_sort Saxi, Hans Petter
title Parlamentarisme i norske fylkeskommuner bedre styring og demokrati?
title_short Parlamentarisme i norske fylkeskommuner bedre styring og demokrati?
title_full Parlamentarisme i norske fylkeskommuner bedre styring og demokrati?
title_fullStr Parlamentarisme i norske fylkeskommuner bedre styring og demokrati?
title_full_unstemmed Parlamentarisme i norske fylkeskommuner bedre styring og demokrati?
title_sort parlamentarisme i norske fylkeskommuner bedre styring og demokrati?
publisher Kommunforskning i Västsverige
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/2077/22163
genre Nordland
Nordland
Nordland
Troms
genre_facet Nordland
Nordland
Nordland
Troms
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/2077/22163
_version_ 1781063701128806400