Knowledge in the network

This dissertation describes a multi-sited, institutional ethnography of the WWF Global Arctic Programme (GAP) investigating the interplay of networks, organizational culture, and institutional structures. Research at the 2009 UNFCCC CoP15, the 2010 CBD CoP10, and in WWF offices spanned continents, s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maclin, Edward Minor
Format: Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: uga 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10724/35765
http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/maclin_edward_m_201508_phd
id ftunivgeorgia:oai:athenaeum.libs.uga.edu:10724/35765
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivgeorgia:oai:athenaeum.libs.uga.edu:10724/35765 2023-05-15T14:42:45+02:00 Knowledge in the network an ethnography of WWF's Global Arctic Program Maclin, Edward Minor 2015-08 http://hdl.handle.net/10724/35765 http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/maclin_edward_m_201508_phd eng eng uga maclin_edward_m_201508_phd http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/maclin_edward_m_201508_phd http://hdl.handle.net/10724/35765 On Campus Only Until 2017-08-01 knowledge epistemology social networks egocentric networks Actor-Network Theory network governance biodiversity conservation anthropology of science and technology anthropology of organizations multi-sited ethnography Arctic conservation Dissertation 2015 ftunivgeorgia 2020-09-24T10:07:16Z This dissertation describes a multi-sited, institutional ethnography of the WWF Global Arctic Programme (GAP) investigating the interplay of networks, organizational culture, and institutional structures. Research at the 2009 UNFCCC CoP15, the 2010 CBD CoP10, and in WWF offices spanned continents, staff changes, and program shifts, and was accompanied by archival research, targeted interviews, egocentric network data collection, and participation in ongoing virtual meetings and discussions. Within WWF's GAP, multinational groups operating within dual local and network contexts carry out the development of policy. The broad WWF Arctic network is not homogeneous. Rather, it is composed of several discreet clusters, two of which correspond roughly to US and Russian offices. Many collaborations within the organization are bilateral or trilateral, involving subsets of the larger Arctic network. 40% of the members of the extended WWF Arctic network are individuals who do not work for WWF: funders, members of findigenous communities, other conservationists, and political officials. As WWF staff develop new conservation initiatives, they enroll and deploy new network members in the service of knowledge development and transformation. The resulting program development glosses over internal complexities and gives the impression of a unified voice for conservation. WWF’s offices are organized through a system of network governance, with the GAP working to facilitate collaboration and sharing of information and resources. Individual projects are similarly nonhierarchical, with coordination accomplished through both formal and informal communication. WWF has a long history of work within the Arctic. Key staff within the extended GAP network have years of experience both within WWF and within the field of conservation practice. Those staff are able to serve as mentors for new staff and as links—both among WWF offices and between WWF and external contacts. The presence of staff members with accurate understandings of their own network structure is particularly salient for the Arctic, where institutional complexities and trans-boundary conservation needs are high. In such an environment, achieving credibility and legitimacy across multiple knowledge domains presents a special challenge: one that WWF attempts to address through the mobilization of networked resources. PhD Anthropology Anthropology J. Peter Brosius J. Peter Brosius Julie Velasquez Runk Ted Gragson Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis Arctic University of Georgia: Athenaeum@UGA Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of Georgia: Athenaeum@UGA
op_collection_id ftunivgeorgia
language English
topic knowledge
epistemology
social networks
egocentric networks
Actor-Network Theory
network governance
biodiversity conservation
anthropology of science and technology
anthropology of organizations
multi-sited ethnography
Arctic conservation
spellingShingle knowledge
epistemology
social networks
egocentric networks
Actor-Network Theory
network governance
biodiversity conservation
anthropology of science and technology
anthropology of organizations
multi-sited ethnography
Arctic conservation
Maclin, Edward Minor
Knowledge in the network
topic_facet knowledge
epistemology
social networks
egocentric networks
Actor-Network Theory
network governance
biodiversity conservation
anthropology of science and technology
anthropology of organizations
multi-sited ethnography
Arctic conservation
description This dissertation describes a multi-sited, institutional ethnography of the WWF Global Arctic Programme (GAP) investigating the interplay of networks, organizational culture, and institutional structures. Research at the 2009 UNFCCC CoP15, the 2010 CBD CoP10, and in WWF offices spanned continents, staff changes, and program shifts, and was accompanied by archival research, targeted interviews, egocentric network data collection, and participation in ongoing virtual meetings and discussions. Within WWF's GAP, multinational groups operating within dual local and network contexts carry out the development of policy. The broad WWF Arctic network is not homogeneous. Rather, it is composed of several discreet clusters, two of which correspond roughly to US and Russian offices. Many collaborations within the organization are bilateral or trilateral, involving subsets of the larger Arctic network. 40% of the members of the extended WWF Arctic network are individuals who do not work for WWF: funders, members of findigenous communities, other conservationists, and political officials. As WWF staff develop new conservation initiatives, they enroll and deploy new network members in the service of knowledge development and transformation. The resulting program development glosses over internal complexities and gives the impression of a unified voice for conservation. WWF’s offices are organized through a system of network governance, with the GAP working to facilitate collaboration and sharing of information and resources. Individual projects are similarly nonhierarchical, with coordination accomplished through both formal and informal communication. WWF has a long history of work within the Arctic. Key staff within the extended GAP network have years of experience both within WWF and within the field of conservation practice. Those staff are able to serve as mentors for new staff and as links—both among WWF offices and between WWF and external contacts. The presence of staff members with accurate understandings of their own network structure is particularly salient for the Arctic, where institutional complexities and trans-boundary conservation needs are high. In such an environment, achieving credibility and legitimacy across multiple knowledge domains presents a special challenge: one that WWF attempts to address through the mobilization of networked resources. PhD Anthropology Anthropology J. Peter Brosius J. Peter Brosius Julie Velasquez Runk Ted Gragson
format Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis
author Maclin, Edward Minor
author_facet Maclin, Edward Minor
author_sort Maclin, Edward Minor
title Knowledge in the network
title_short Knowledge in the network
title_full Knowledge in the network
title_fullStr Knowledge in the network
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge in the network
title_sort knowledge in the network
publisher uga
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10724/35765
http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/maclin_edward_m_201508_phd
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation maclin_edward_m_201508_phd
http://purl.galileo.usg.edu/uga_etd/maclin_edward_m_201508_phd
http://hdl.handle.net/10724/35765
op_rights On Campus Only Until 2017-08-01
_version_ 1766314477772341248