Evolutionary and developmental origins of the vertebrate dentition

• Published in: Journal of Anatomy
• Main Authors: Huysseune, Ann, Sire, Jean-Yves, Witten, Paul Eckhard
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2009
• Subjects: Biology and Life Sciences; dentition; development; evolution; odontodes; teeth; vertebrates; ZEBRAFISH DANIO-RERIO; TOOTH DEVELOPMENT; NEURAL CREST; EXPRESSION PATTERNS; CONODONT ELEMENTS; ATLANTIC SALMON; HOMEOTIC TRANSFORMATION; PHARYNGEAL DENTICLES; CORYDORAS AENEUS; ARMORED CATFISH; Atlantic salmon
• Online Access: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/684242; http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-684242; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01053.x; https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/684242/file/684254

According to the classical theory, teeth derive from odontodes that invaded the oral cavity in conjunction with the origin of jaws (the 'outside in' theory). A recent alternative hypothesis suggests that teeth evolved prior to the origin of jaws as endodermal derivatives (the 'inside out' hypothesis). We compare the two theories in the light of current data and propose a third scenario, a revised 'outside in' hypothesis. We suggest that teeth may have arisen before the origin of jaws, as a result of competent, odontode-forming ectoderm invading the oropharyngeal cavity through the mouth as well as through the gill slits, interacting with neural crest-derived mesenchyme. This hypothesis revives the homology between skin denticles (odontodes) and teeth. Our hypothesis is based on (1) the assumption that endoderm alone, together with neural crest, cannot form teeth; (2) the observation that pharyngeal teeth are present only in species known to possess gill slits, and disappear from the pharyngeal region in early tetrapods concomitant with the closure of gill slits, and (3) the observation that the dental lamina (sensu Reif, 1982) is not a prerequisite for teeth to form. We next discuss the progress that has been made to understand the spatially restricted loss of teeth from certain arches, and the many questions that remain regarding the ontogenetic loss of teeth in specific taxa. The recent advances that have been made in our knowledge on the molecular control of tooth formation in non-mammalians (mostly in some teleost model species) will undoubtedly contribute to answering these questions in the coming years.