Faecal particle size distribution in captive wild ruminants: an approach to the browser/grazer dicotomy from the other end

We investigated the particle size distribution in 245 faecal samples of 8 1 species of captive ruminants by a wet-sieving procedure. As a comparative measure, the modulus of fineness (MOF; Poppi et al. 1980) was used. Species were classified as frugivores (n=5), browsers (BR, n=16), intermediate fee...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oecologia
Main Authors: Clauss, Marcus, Lechner-Doll, M, Streich, W Jürgen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/669804
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-669804
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0894-8
https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/669804/file/761066
id ftunivgent:oai:archive.ugent.be:669804
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivgent:oai:archive.ugent.be:669804 2023-06-11T04:03:17+02:00 Faecal particle size distribution in captive wild ruminants: an approach to the browser/grazer dicotomy from the other end Clauss, Marcus Lechner-Doll, M Streich, W Jürgen 2002 application/pdf https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/669804 http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-669804 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0894-8 https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/669804/file/761066 eng eng https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/669804 http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-669804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0894-8 https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/669804/file/761066 No license (in copyright) info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess OECOLOGIA ISSN: 0029-8549 Biology and Life Sciences faeces DEER particle size ruminant diversification selective particle retention feeding type MOOSE ALCES-ALCES CERVUS-ELAPHUS PLANT-PARTICLES RETENTION TIME BODY-SIZE CATTLE SHEEP RUMEN RUMINATION journalArticle info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2002 ftunivgent https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0894-8 2023-05-10T22:31:53Z We investigated the particle size distribution in 245 faecal samples of 8 1 species of captive ruminants by a wet-sieving procedure. As a comparative measure, the modulus of fineness (MOF; Poppi et al. 1980) was used. Species were classified as frugivores (n=5), browsers (BR, n=16), intermediate feeders (IM, n=35) and grazers (GR, n=25). BR generally had a higher proportion of large particles, i.e. higher MOF values, than IM or GR of comparable size. These findings are in accord with reported lower fibre digestibility and less selective particle retention in BR, and are indicative of a difference in reticulo-ruminal physiology between the main ruminant feeding types. Possible consequences of the escape of larger particles from a browser's reticulo-rumen for the feeding of captive BR are briefly discussed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Ghent University Academic Bibliography Oecologia 131 3 343 349
institution Open Polar
collection Ghent University Academic Bibliography
op_collection_id ftunivgent
language English
topic Biology and Life Sciences
faeces
DEER
particle size
ruminant diversification
selective particle retention
feeding type
MOOSE ALCES-ALCES
CERVUS-ELAPHUS
PLANT-PARTICLES
RETENTION TIME
BODY-SIZE
CATTLE
SHEEP
RUMEN
RUMINATION
spellingShingle Biology and Life Sciences
faeces
DEER
particle size
ruminant diversification
selective particle retention
feeding type
MOOSE ALCES-ALCES
CERVUS-ELAPHUS
PLANT-PARTICLES
RETENTION TIME
BODY-SIZE
CATTLE
SHEEP
RUMEN
RUMINATION
Clauss, Marcus
Lechner-Doll, M
Streich, W Jürgen
Faecal particle size distribution in captive wild ruminants: an approach to the browser/grazer dicotomy from the other end
topic_facet Biology and Life Sciences
faeces
DEER
particle size
ruminant diversification
selective particle retention
feeding type
MOOSE ALCES-ALCES
CERVUS-ELAPHUS
PLANT-PARTICLES
RETENTION TIME
BODY-SIZE
CATTLE
SHEEP
RUMEN
RUMINATION
description We investigated the particle size distribution in 245 faecal samples of 8 1 species of captive ruminants by a wet-sieving procedure. As a comparative measure, the modulus of fineness (MOF; Poppi et al. 1980) was used. Species were classified as frugivores (n=5), browsers (BR, n=16), intermediate feeders (IM, n=35) and grazers (GR, n=25). BR generally had a higher proportion of large particles, i.e. higher MOF values, than IM or GR of comparable size. These findings are in accord with reported lower fibre digestibility and less selective particle retention in BR, and are indicative of a difference in reticulo-ruminal physiology between the main ruminant feeding types. Possible consequences of the escape of larger particles from a browser's reticulo-rumen for the feeding of captive BR are briefly discussed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Clauss, Marcus
Lechner-Doll, M
Streich, W Jürgen
author_facet Clauss, Marcus
Lechner-Doll, M
Streich, W Jürgen
author_sort Clauss, Marcus
title Faecal particle size distribution in captive wild ruminants: an approach to the browser/grazer dicotomy from the other end
title_short Faecal particle size distribution in captive wild ruminants: an approach to the browser/grazer dicotomy from the other end
title_full Faecal particle size distribution in captive wild ruminants: an approach to the browser/grazer dicotomy from the other end
title_fullStr Faecal particle size distribution in captive wild ruminants: an approach to the browser/grazer dicotomy from the other end
title_full_unstemmed Faecal particle size distribution in captive wild ruminants: an approach to the browser/grazer dicotomy from the other end
title_sort faecal particle size distribution in captive wild ruminants: an approach to the browser/grazer dicotomy from the other end
publishDate 2002
url https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/669804
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-669804
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0894-8
https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/669804/file/761066
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_source OECOLOGIA
ISSN: 0029-8549
op_relation https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/669804
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-669804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0894-8
https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/669804/file/761066
op_rights No license (in copyright)
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0894-8
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 131
container_issue 3
container_start_page 343
op_container_end_page 349
_version_ 1768378397444014080