Conserving nature under neoliberalism in Europe: The Greenbelt of Fennoscandia project

Recent years have witnessed a growing debate regarding the appropriate way to design and manage protected areas throughout the globe. While the venerable fortress conservation paradigm has been strongly criticized, supposedly more integrative and participatory approaches that aimed to replace it hav...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Florin, Ian
Format: Conference Object
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:97678
_version_ 1835014318493532160
author Florin, Ian
author_facet Florin, Ian
author_sort Florin, Ian
collection Unknown
description Recent years have witnessed a growing debate regarding the appropriate way to design and manage protected areas throughout the globe. While the venerable fortress conservation paradigm has been strongly criticized, supposedly more integrative and participatory approaches that aimed to replace it have come under considerable criticisms over the last two decades, notably concerning their incapacity to achieve consequential conservation outcomes. In this context, large-scale conservation corridors - seemingly capable to mitigate the effects of habitat fragmentation on key ecosystem processes – have increasingly gained prominence with scientists and protected areas practitioners. As recently as during the 2016 IUCN World Parks Congress, large-scale corridors have been promoted as scientifically sound, collaborative and profitable responses to threats to biodiversity. Building on literature in political ecology and geography, my thesis wants to analyze how and why individuals and collectives frame, shape and use large-scale corridors. Using the Greenbelt of Fennoscandia as a case study, I examine how stakeholders select their arguments – together with concepts and moralities that underlie them – regarding the project and why they do so. Drawing on semi-structured interviews as well as a desk study of stakeholders' claims, I examine how conservation discourses and practices are justified – in Boltanski & Thévenot's terms – and expressed, through antipolitics. I argue that these justifications related to nature conceptions or economic rationality contribute to what Büscher calls fictitious conservation, that occurs when conservation goals are replaced by the pursuit of competitive advantage through consensus making and marketing.
format Conference Object
genre Fennoscandia
genre_facet Fennoscandia
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
id ftunivgeneve:oai:unige.ch:aou:unige:97678
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftunivgeneve
op_relation unige:97678
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
op_source Association of American Geographers' Annual Meeting, (2017)
publishDate 2017
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivgeneve:oai:unige.ch:aou:unige:97678 2025-06-15T14:26:50+00:00 Conserving nature under neoliberalism in Europe: The Greenbelt of Fennoscandia project Florin, Ian 2017 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:97678 eng eng unige:97678 info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess Association of American Geographers' Annual Meeting, (2017) info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/333.7-333.9 Norway Finland Protected Areas Corridors Conservation National Parks info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject ConferencePaper Présentation / Intervention 2017 ftunivgeneve 2025-05-23T07:13:43Z Recent years have witnessed a growing debate regarding the appropriate way to design and manage protected areas throughout the globe. While the venerable fortress conservation paradigm has been strongly criticized, supposedly more integrative and participatory approaches that aimed to replace it have come under considerable criticisms over the last two decades, notably concerning their incapacity to achieve consequential conservation outcomes. In this context, large-scale conservation corridors - seemingly capable to mitigate the effects of habitat fragmentation on key ecosystem processes – have increasingly gained prominence with scientists and protected areas practitioners. As recently as during the 2016 IUCN World Parks Congress, large-scale corridors have been promoted as scientifically sound, collaborative and profitable responses to threats to biodiversity. Building on literature in political ecology and geography, my thesis wants to analyze how and why individuals and collectives frame, shape and use large-scale corridors. Using the Greenbelt of Fennoscandia as a case study, I examine how stakeholders select their arguments – together with concepts and moralities that underlie them – regarding the project and why they do so. Drawing on semi-structured interviews as well as a desk study of stakeholders' claims, I examine how conservation discourses and practices are justified – in Boltanski & Thévenot's terms – and expressed, through antipolitics. I argue that these justifications related to nature conceptions or economic rationality contribute to what Büscher calls fictitious conservation, that occurs when conservation goals are replaced by the pursuit of competitive advantage through consensus making and marketing. Conference Object Fennoscandia Unknown Norway
spellingShingle info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/333.7-333.9
Norway
Finland
Protected Areas
Corridors
Conservation
National Parks
Florin, Ian
Conserving nature under neoliberalism in Europe: The Greenbelt of Fennoscandia project
title Conserving nature under neoliberalism in Europe: The Greenbelt of Fennoscandia project
title_full Conserving nature under neoliberalism in Europe: The Greenbelt of Fennoscandia project
title_fullStr Conserving nature under neoliberalism in Europe: The Greenbelt of Fennoscandia project
title_full_unstemmed Conserving nature under neoliberalism in Europe: The Greenbelt of Fennoscandia project
title_short Conserving nature under neoliberalism in Europe: The Greenbelt of Fennoscandia project
title_sort conserving nature under neoliberalism in europe: the greenbelt of fennoscandia project
topic info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/333.7-333.9
Norway
Finland
Protected Areas
Corridors
Conservation
National Parks
topic_facet info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/333.7-333.9
Norway
Finland
Protected Areas
Corridors
Conservation
National Parks
url https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:97678