Sampling native and non-native mobile epifauna with baited traps and habitat collectors – Port of Gdynia case study (southern Baltic Sea, Poland)

The effectiveness of two artificial habitat collectors, crab condo (HC1) and habitat crate (HC2), providing a refuge for small mobile fauna, was tested along with two commercial baited traps, Chinese box trap (BT1) and Gee’s Minnow trap (BT2) recommended for only single deployments under a harmonize...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Normant-Saremba, Monika, Hegele-Drywa, Joanna, Marszewska, Lena
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wydział Oceanografii i Geografii Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/oandhs/article/view/7786
id ftunivgdanskojs:oai:ojsug.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7786
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivgdanskojs:oai:ojsug.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7786 2023-05-15T17:38:25+02:00 Sampling native and non-native mobile epifauna with baited traps and habitat collectors – Port of Gdynia case study (southern Baltic Sea, Poland) Normant-Saremba, Monika Hegele-Drywa, Joanna Marszewska, Lena 2020-09-28 application/pdf https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/oandhs/article/view/7786 eng eng Wydział Oceanografii i Geografii Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/oandhs/article/view/7786/6919 https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/oandhs/article/view/7786 Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies; Vol. 49 No. 3 (2020); 319-327 Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies; Tom 49 Nr 3 (2020); 319-327 1897-3191 1730-413X port survey monitoring methods sampling techniques macrozoobenthos nonindigenous species Baltic Sea info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2020 ftunivgdanskojs 2023-02-07T18:10:20Z The effectiveness of two artificial habitat collectors, crab condo (HC1) and habitat crate (HC2), providing a refuge for small mobile fauna, was tested along with two commercial baited traps, Chinese box trap (BT1) and Gee’s Minnow trap (BT2) recommended for only single deployments under a harmonized survey of the Baltic and the North-East Atlantic. Our objective was also to determine whether a multi-deployment of baited traps in the growing season increases the diversity and abundance of collected mobile epifauna. Nineteen species of benthic mobile epifauna, including six non-indigenous species (NIS), were collected between May and October 2014 using all tested types of traps in the Port of Gdynia (southern Baltic Sea). Crustaceans, represented by 16 taxa, constituted the group with the highest diversity and abundance. Our study showed that HC1 and HC2 are more effective gear than BT1 and BT2, as both species richness (including NIS) and abundance were higher. Furthermore, the double deployment of BT1 and BT2 increased the diversity and abundance of the captured fauna. The use of artificial habitat collectors as an additional method to the already recommended baited traps for mobile epifauna monitoring in ports should be considered and the number of baited trap deployments should be increased during the growing season. The effectiveness of two artificial habitat collectors, crab condo (HC1) and habitat crate (HC2), providing a refuge for small mobile fauna, was tested along with two commercial baited traps, Chinese box trap (BT1) and Gee’s Minnow trap (BT2) recommended for only single deployments under a harmonized survey of the Baltic and the North-East Atlantic. Our objective was also to determine whether a multi-deployment of baited traps in the growing season increases the diversity and abundance of collected mobile epifauna. Nineteen species of benthic mobile epifauna, including six non-indigenous species (NIS), were collected between May and October 2014 using all tested types of traps in the Port of ... Article in Journal/Newspaper North East Atlantic University Scientific Journals University of Gdansk (UGN)
institution Open Polar
collection University Scientific Journals University of Gdansk (UGN)
op_collection_id ftunivgdanskojs
language English
topic port survey
monitoring methods
sampling techniques
macrozoobenthos
nonindigenous species
Baltic Sea
spellingShingle port survey
monitoring methods
sampling techniques
macrozoobenthos
nonindigenous species
Baltic Sea
Normant-Saremba, Monika
Hegele-Drywa, Joanna
Marszewska, Lena
Sampling native and non-native mobile epifauna with baited traps and habitat collectors – Port of Gdynia case study (southern Baltic Sea, Poland)
topic_facet port survey
monitoring methods
sampling techniques
macrozoobenthos
nonindigenous species
Baltic Sea
description The effectiveness of two artificial habitat collectors, crab condo (HC1) and habitat crate (HC2), providing a refuge for small mobile fauna, was tested along with two commercial baited traps, Chinese box trap (BT1) and Gee’s Minnow trap (BT2) recommended for only single deployments under a harmonized survey of the Baltic and the North-East Atlantic. Our objective was also to determine whether a multi-deployment of baited traps in the growing season increases the diversity and abundance of collected mobile epifauna. Nineteen species of benthic mobile epifauna, including six non-indigenous species (NIS), were collected between May and October 2014 using all tested types of traps in the Port of Gdynia (southern Baltic Sea). Crustaceans, represented by 16 taxa, constituted the group with the highest diversity and abundance. Our study showed that HC1 and HC2 are more effective gear than BT1 and BT2, as both species richness (including NIS) and abundance were higher. Furthermore, the double deployment of BT1 and BT2 increased the diversity and abundance of the captured fauna. The use of artificial habitat collectors as an additional method to the already recommended baited traps for mobile epifauna monitoring in ports should be considered and the number of baited trap deployments should be increased during the growing season. The effectiveness of two artificial habitat collectors, crab condo (HC1) and habitat crate (HC2), providing a refuge for small mobile fauna, was tested along with two commercial baited traps, Chinese box trap (BT1) and Gee’s Minnow trap (BT2) recommended for only single deployments under a harmonized survey of the Baltic and the North-East Atlantic. Our objective was also to determine whether a multi-deployment of baited traps in the growing season increases the diversity and abundance of collected mobile epifauna. Nineteen species of benthic mobile epifauna, including six non-indigenous species (NIS), were collected between May and October 2014 using all tested types of traps in the Port of ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Normant-Saremba, Monika
Hegele-Drywa, Joanna
Marszewska, Lena
author_facet Normant-Saremba, Monika
Hegele-Drywa, Joanna
Marszewska, Lena
author_sort Normant-Saremba, Monika
title Sampling native and non-native mobile epifauna with baited traps and habitat collectors – Port of Gdynia case study (southern Baltic Sea, Poland)
title_short Sampling native and non-native mobile epifauna with baited traps and habitat collectors – Port of Gdynia case study (southern Baltic Sea, Poland)
title_full Sampling native and non-native mobile epifauna with baited traps and habitat collectors – Port of Gdynia case study (southern Baltic Sea, Poland)
title_fullStr Sampling native and non-native mobile epifauna with baited traps and habitat collectors – Port of Gdynia case study (southern Baltic Sea, Poland)
title_full_unstemmed Sampling native and non-native mobile epifauna with baited traps and habitat collectors – Port of Gdynia case study (southern Baltic Sea, Poland)
title_sort sampling native and non-native mobile epifauna with baited traps and habitat collectors – port of gdynia case study (southern baltic sea, poland)
publisher Wydział Oceanografii i Geografii Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego
publishDate 2020
url https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/oandhs/article/view/7786
genre North East Atlantic
genre_facet North East Atlantic
op_source Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies; Vol. 49 No. 3 (2020); 319-327
Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies; Tom 49 Nr 3 (2020); 319-327
1897-3191
1730-413X
op_relation https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/oandhs/article/view/7786/6919
https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/oandhs/article/view/7786
_version_ 1766138845581017088