WETCHIMP-WSL: intercomparison of wetland methane emissions models over West Siberia (discussion paper)

Article © Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Biogeosciences (BG). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in BG (see http://hdl.handle.net/10871/18995 in ORE) Wetlands are the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bohn, TJ, Melton, JR, Ito, A, Kleinen, T, Spahni, R, Stocker, BD, Zhang, B, Zhu, X, Schroeder., R, Glagolev, MV, Maksyutov, S, Brovkin, Victor, Chen, G, Denisov, SN, Eliseev, SN, Gallego-Sala, Angela V., Mcdonald, KC, Rawlins, MA, Riley, WJ, Subin, ZM, Tian, H, Zhuang, Q, Kaplan, JO
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: European Geosciences Union (EGU) 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10871/17199
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-12-1907-2015
id ftunivexeter:oai:ore.exeter.ac.uk:10871/17199
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivexeter:oai:ore.exeter.ac.uk:10871/17199 2023-05-15T17:58:16+02:00 WETCHIMP-WSL: intercomparison of wetland methane emissions models over West Siberia (discussion paper) Bohn, TJ Melton, JR Ito, A Kleinen, T Spahni, R Stocker, BD Zhang, B Zhu, X Schroeder., R Glagolev, MV Maksyutov, S Brovkin, Victor Chen, G Denisov, SN Eliseev, SN Gallego-Sala, Angela V. Mcdonald, KC Rawlins, MA Riley, WJ Subin, ZM Tian, H Zhuang, Q Kaplan, JO 2015 http://hdl.handle.net/10871/17199 https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-12-1907-2015 en eng European Geosciences Union (EGU) http://www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/12/1907/2015/bgd-12-1907-2015.html Vol. 12, pp. 1907 - 1973 doi:10.5194/bgd-12-1907-2015 http://hdl.handle.net/10871/17199 1726-4170 Biogeosciences Discussions This is the author's accepted version of the article. The open access version of the paper is available at http://www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/12/1907/2015/bgd-12-1907-2015.html. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. CC-BY Article 2015 ftunivexeter https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-12-1907-2015 2022-11-20T21:31:04Z Article © Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Biogeosciences (BG). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in BG (see http://hdl.handle.net/10871/18995 in ORE) Wetlands are the world's largest natural source of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas. The strong sensitivity of methane emissions to environmental factors such as soil temperature and moisture has led to concerns about potential positive feedbacks to climate change. This risk is particularly relevant at high latitudes, which have experienced pronounced warming and where thawing permafrost could potentially liberate large amounts of labile carbon over the next 100 years. However, global models disagree as to the magnitude and spatial distribution of emissions, due to uncertainties in wetland area and emissions per unit area and a scarcity of in situ observations. Recent intensive field campaigns across the West Siberian Lowland (WSL) make this an ideal region over which to assess the performance of large-scale process-based wetland models in a high-latitude environment. Here we present the results of a follow-up to the Wetland and Wetland CH4 Intercomparison of Models Project (WETCHIMP), focused on the West Siberian Lowland (WETCHIMP-WSL). We assessed 21 models and 5 inversions over this domain in terms of total CH4 emissions, simulated wetland areas, and CH4 fluxes per unit wetland area and compared these results to an intensive in situ CH4 flux dataset, several wetland maps, and two satellite inundation products. We found that: (a) despite the large scatter of individual estimates, 12 year mean estimates of annual total emissions over the WSL from forward models (5.34 ± 0.54 Tg CH4 y-1), inversions (6.06 ± 1.22 Tg CH4 y-1), and in situ observations (3.91 ± 1.29 Tg CH4 y-1) largely agreed, (b) forward models using inundation products alone to estimate wetland areas suffered from severe biases in CH4 emissions, (c) the ... Article in Journal/Newspaper permafrost Siberia University of Exeter: Open Research Exeter (ORE)
institution Open Polar
collection University of Exeter: Open Research Exeter (ORE)
op_collection_id ftunivexeter
language English
description Article © Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Biogeosciences (BG). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in BG (see http://hdl.handle.net/10871/18995 in ORE) Wetlands are the world's largest natural source of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas. The strong sensitivity of methane emissions to environmental factors such as soil temperature and moisture has led to concerns about potential positive feedbacks to climate change. This risk is particularly relevant at high latitudes, which have experienced pronounced warming and where thawing permafrost could potentially liberate large amounts of labile carbon over the next 100 years. However, global models disagree as to the magnitude and spatial distribution of emissions, due to uncertainties in wetland area and emissions per unit area and a scarcity of in situ observations. Recent intensive field campaigns across the West Siberian Lowland (WSL) make this an ideal region over which to assess the performance of large-scale process-based wetland models in a high-latitude environment. Here we present the results of a follow-up to the Wetland and Wetland CH4 Intercomparison of Models Project (WETCHIMP), focused on the West Siberian Lowland (WETCHIMP-WSL). We assessed 21 models and 5 inversions over this domain in terms of total CH4 emissions, simulated wetland areas, and CH4 fluxes per unit wetland area and compared these results to an intensive in situ CH4 flux dataset, several wetland maps, and two satellite inundation products. We found that: (a) despite the large scatter of individual estimates, 12 year mean estimates of annual total emissions over the WSL from forward models (5.34 ± 0.54 Tg CH4 y-1), inversions (6.06 ± 1.22 Tg CH4 y-1), and in situ observations (3.91 ± 1.29 Tg CH4 y-1) largely agreed, (b) forward models using inundation products alone to estimate wetland areas suffered from severe biases in CH4 emissions, (c) the ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bohn, TJ
Melton, JR
Ito, A
Kleinen, T
Spahni, R
Stocker, BD
Zhang, B
Zhu, X
Schroeder., R
Glagolev, MV
Maksyutov, S
Brovkin, Victor
Chen, G
Denisov, SN
Eliseev, SN
Gallego-Sala, Angela V.
Mcdonald, KC
Rawlins, MA
Riley, WJ
Subin, ZM
Tian, H
Zhuang, Q
Kaplan, JO
spellingShingle Bohn, TJ
Melton, JR
Ito, A
Kleinen, T
Spahni, R
Stocker, BD
Zhang, B
Zhu, X
Schroeder., R
Glagolev, MV
Maksyutov, S
Brovkin, Victor
Chen, G
Denisov, SN
Eliseev, SN
Gallego-Sala, Angela V.
Mcdonald, KC
Rawlins, MA
Riley, WJ
Subin, ZM
Tian, H
Zhuang, Q
Kaplan, JO
WETCHIMP-WSL: intercomparison of wetland methane emissions models over West Siberia (discussion paper)
author_facet Bohn, TJ
Melton, JR
Ito, A
Kleinen, T
Spahni, R
Stocker, BD
Zhang, B
Zhu, X
Schroeder., R
Glagolev, MV
Maksyutov, S
Brovkin, Victor
Chen, G
Denisov, SN
Eliseev, SN
Gallego-Sala, Angela V.
Mcdonald, KC
Rawlins, MA
Riley, WJ
Subin, ZM
Tian, H
Zhuang, Q
Kaplan, JO
author_sort Bohn, TJ
title WETCHIMP-WSL: intercomparison of wetland methane emissions models over West Siberia (discussion paper)
title_short WETCHIMP-WSL: intercomparison of wetland methane emissions models over West Siberia (discussion paper)
title_full WETCHIMP-WSL: intercomparison of wetland methane emissions models over West Siberia (discussion paper)
title_fullStr WETCHIMP-WSL: intercomparison of wetland methane emissions models over West Siberia (discussion paper)
title_full_unstemmed WETCHIMP-WSL: intercomparison of wetland methane emissions models over West Siberia (discussion paper)
title_sort wetchimp-wsl: intercomparison of wetland methane emissions models over west siberia (discussion paper)
publisher European Geosciences Union (EGU)
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10871/17199
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-12-1907-2015
genre permafrost
Siberia
genre_facet permafrost
Siberia
op_relation http://www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/12/1907/2015/bgd-12-1907-2015.html
Vol. 12, pp. 1907 - 1973
doi:10.5194/bgd-12-1907-2015
http://hdl.handle.net/10871/17199
1726-4170
Biogeosciences Discussions
op_rights This is the author's accepted version of the article. The open access version of the paper is available at http://www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/12/1907/2015/bgd-12-1907-2015.html. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-12-1907-2015
_version_ 1766166835720355840