Sleipner CO₂ securely stored deep beneath seabed, in spite of unexpected Hugin fracture discovery

General readers of Nature may now think that the proposition to store carbon dioxide in deep geological strata is doomed to fail (Monastersky 2013). This is far from the case, as a more balanced review could easily have pointed out. It is now important to provide an alternative perspective, based on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haszeldine, R Stuart, Scott, Vivian, Johnson, Gareth, Mabon, Leslie, Gilfillan, Stuart, Shackley, Simon
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage (SCCS) 2014
Subjects:
CCS
CO2
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1842/15695
id ftunivedinburgh:oai:era.ed.ac.uk:1842/15695
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivedinburgh:oai:era.ed.ac.uk:1842/15695 2023-07-30T04:06:02+02:00 Sleipner CO₂ securely stored deep beneath seabed, in spite of unexpected Hugin fracture discovery Haszeldine, R Stuart Scott, Vivian Johnson, Gareth Mabon, Leslie Gilfillan, Stuart Shackley, Simon 2014-01-13 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/1842/15695 en eng Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage (SCCS) WP SCCS 2014-01 http://hdl.handle.net/1842/15695 Carbon Capture and Storage CCS CO2 Sleipner Hugin fracture Working Paper 2014 ftunivedinburgh 2023-07-09T20:30:26Z General readers of Nature may now think that the proposition to store carbon dioxide in deep geological strata is doomed to fail (Monastersky 2013). This is far from the case, as a more balanced review could easily have pointed out. It is now important to provide an alternative perspective, based on published information, that geological storage of CO2 by deep injection for CCS is both sufficiently secure, and knowable in its environmental impacts. Furthermore, research has shown that there is good support from many parts of the public, although qualified, for CCS as an essential part of a response to the threat of global climate change and ocean acidification. General readers of Nature may now think that the proposition to store carbon dioxide in deep geological strata is doomed to fail (Monastersky 2013). This is far from the case, as a more balanced review could easily have pointed out. It is now important to provide an alternative perspective, based on published information, that geological storage of CO2 by deep injection for CCS is both sufficiently secure, and knowable in its environmental impacts. Furthermore, research has shown that there is good support from many parts of the public, although qualified, for CCS as an essential part of a response to the threat of global climate change and ocean acidification. Report Ocean acidification Edinburgh Research Archive (ERA - University of Edinburgh) Sleipner ENVELOPE(-41.417,-41.417,63.883,63.883) Hugin ENVELOPE(-21.450,-21.450,74.900,74.900)
institution Open Polar
collection Edinburgh Research Archive (ERA - University of Edinburgh)
op_collection_id ftunivedinburgh
language English
topic Carbon Capture and Storage
CCS
CO2
Sleipner
Hugin fracture
spellingShingle Carbon Capture and Storage
CCS
CO2
Sleipner
Hugin fracture
Haszeldine, R Stuart
Scott, Vivian
Johnson, Gareth
Mabon, Leslie
Gilfillan, Stuart
Shackley, Simon
Sleipner CO₂ securely stored deep beneath seabed, in spite of unexpected Hugin fracture discovery
topic_facet Carbon Capture and Storage
CCS
CO2
Sleipner
Hugin fracture
description General readers of Nature may now think that the proposition to store carbon dioxide in deep geological strata is doomed to fail (Monastersky 2013). This is far from the case, as a more balanced review could easily have pointed out. It is now important to provide an alternative perspective, based on published information, that geological storage of CO2 by deep injection for CCS is both sufficiently secure, and knowable in its environmental impacts. Furthermore, research has shown that there is good support from many parts of the public, although qualified, for CCS as an essential part of a response to the threat of global climate change and ocean acidification. General readers of Nature may now think that the proposition to store carbon dioxide in deep geological strata is doomed to fail (Monastersky 2013). This is far from the case, as a more balanced review could easily have pointed out. It is now important to provide an alternative perspective, based on published information, that geological storage of CO2 by deep injection for CCS is both sufficiently secure, and knowable in its environmental impacts. Furthermore, research has shown that there is good support from many parts of the public, although qualified, for CCS as an essential part of a response to the threat of global climate change and ocean acidification.
format Report
author Haszeldine, R Stuart
Scott, Vivian
Johnson, Gareth
Mabon, Leslie
Gilfillan, Stuart
Shackley, Simon
author_facet Haszeldine, R Stuart
Scott, Vivian
Johnson, Gareth
Mabon, Leslie
Gilfillan, Stuart
Shackley, Simon
author_sort Haszeldine, R Stuart
title Sleipner CO₂ securely stored deep beneath seabed, in spite of unexpected Hugin fracture discovery
title_short Sleipner CO₂ securely stored deep beneath seabed, in spite of unexpected Hugin fracture discovery
title_full Sleipner CO₂ securely stored deep beneath seabed, in spite of unexpected Hugin fracture discovery
title_fullStr Sleipner CO₂ securely stored deep beneath seabed, in spite of unexpected Hugin fracture discovery
title_full_unstemmed Sleipner CO₂ securely stored deep beneath seabed, in spite of unexpected Hugin fracture discovery
title_sort sleipner co₂ securely stored deep beneath seabed, in spite of unexpected hugin fracture discovery
publisher Scottish Carbon Capture and Storage (SCCS)
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/1842/15695
long_lat ENVELOPE(-41.417,-41.417,63.883,63.883)
ENVELOPE(-21.450,-21.450,74.900,74.900)
geographic Sleipner
Hugin
geographic_facet Sleipner
Hugin
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_relation WP SCCS 2014-01
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/15695
_version_ 1772818405484658688