Vitality policy as a tool for rural development in peripheral Finland

In Finland, there has been a strong tendency to direct rural development from competitiveness and (traditional) enterprise and industrial policy towards a more holistic, systemic and place‐based “vitality policy” including softer development values related to attractive living environments, communal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Growth and Change
Main Authors: Makkonen, Teemu, Kahila, Petri
Other Authors: Karelian Institute, activities
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Wiley 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/8072
id ftuniveasternfin:oai:erepo.uef.fi:123456789/8072
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuniveasternfin:oai:erepo.uef.fi:123456789/8072 2024-06-16T07:41:12+00:00 Vitality policy as a tool for rural development in peripheral Finland Makkonen, Teemu Kahila, Petri Karelian Institute, activities 2020-03-27T13:34:54Z 706-726 https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/8072 englanti unknown Wiley Britannia Growth and change http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/grow.12364 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020-EU.3.6.1.2./727097/EU/Resituating the local in cohesion and territorial development/RELOCAL 10.1111/grow.12364 0017-4815 2 52 https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/8072 In copyright 1.0 openAccess © Wiley Periodicals, Inc. https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ Tieteelliset aikakauslehtiartikkelit A1 article artikkeli 2020 ftuniveasternfin https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12364 2024-05-23T03:07:27Z In Finland, there has been a strong tendency to direct rural development from competitiveness and (traditional) enterprise and industrial policy towards a more holistic, systemic and place‐based “vitality policy” including softer development values related to attractive living environments, communality and the well‐being of residents. Research on the topic has, however, remained limited and the views of municipalities unaccounted for. Here, the issue of how municipalities themselves regard this shift in their development work was taken under scrutiny using data collected from the rural and peripheral region of North Karelia (Finland). The empirical material was collected from municipal strategies and via face‐to‐face and telephone interviews with municipal officials. The results show that vitality policy is a holistic place‐based tool to develop rural regions involving several policy sectors and a network (system) of organisations from the public, private, and third‐sector centred around the municipality, that is, local government. Thus, those involved constitute a quadruple helix of actors engaged in rural development. At the same time, under vitality policy, the municipalities have taken a more active role towards strengthening communality. Nevertheless, if (traditional) enterprise and industrial policy fails, other policy measures will have a limited impact on rural development. final draft peerReviewed Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* UEF eRepository (University of Eastern Finland) Growth and Change
institution Open Polar
collection UEF eRepository (University of Eastern Finland)
op_collection_id ftuniveasternfin
language unknown
description In Finland, there has been a strong tendency to direct rural development from competitiveness and (traditional) enterprise and industrial policy towards a more holistic, systemic and place‐based “vitality policy” including softer development values related to attractive living environments, communality and the well‐being of residents. Research on the topic has, however, remained limited and the views of municipalities unaccounted for. Here, the issue of how municipalities themselves regard this shift in their development work was taken under scrutiny using data collected from the rural and peripheral region of North Karelia (Finland). The empirical material was collected from municipal strategies and via face‐to‐face and telephone interviews with municipal officials. The results show that vitality policy is a holistic place‐based tool to develop rural regions involving several policy sectors and a network (system) of organisations from the public, private, and third‐sector centred around the municipality, that is, local government. Thus, those involved constitute a quadruple helix of actors engaged in rural development. At the same time, under vitality policy, the municipalities have taken a more active role towards strengthening communality. Nevertheless, if (traditional) enterprise and industrial policy fails, other policy measures will have a limited impact on rural development. final draft peerReviewed
author2 Karelian Institute, activities
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Makkonen, Teemu
Kahila, Petri
spellingShingle Makkonen, Teemu
Kahila, Petri
Vitality policy as a tool for rural development in peripheral Finland
author_facet Makkonen, Teemu
Kahila, Petri
author_sort Makkonen, Teemu
title Vitality policy as a tool for rural development in peripheral Finland
title_short Vitality policy as a tool for rural development in peripheral Finland
title_full Vitality policy as a tool for rural development in peripheral Finland
title_fullStr Vitality policy as a tool for rural development in peripheral Finland
title_full_unstemmed Vitality policy as a tool for rural development in peripheral Finland
title_sort vitality policy as a tool for rural development in peripheral finland
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2020
url https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/8072
genre karelia*
genre_facet karelia*
op_relation Growth and change
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/grow.12364
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020-EU.3.6.1.2./727097/EU/Resituating the local in cohesion and territorial development/RELOCAL
10.1111/grow.12364
0017-4815
2
52
https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/8072
op_rights In copyright 1.0
openAccess
© Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12364
container_title Growth and Change
_version_ 1802008341593980928