Construct Validity of Clinical Nurse Specialist Core Competency Scale: An Exploratory Factor Analysis

Aim To conduct a construct validity test on a clinical nurse specialist core competency scale. Background Clinical nurse specialists’ competency development dates back to the late 20th century; however, there is scarcity of competency descriptions from outside of North America. Furthermore, little k...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Clinical Nursing
Main Authors: Jokiniemi, Krista, Pietilä, Anna-Maija, Mikkonen, Santtu
Other Authors: Department of Nursing Science, activities, Department of Applied Physics, activities
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/26628
id ftuniveasternfin:oai:erepo.uef.fi:123456789/26628
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuniveasternfin:oai:erepo.uef.fi:123456789/26628 2023-05-15T16:52:17+02:00 Construct Validity of Clinical Nurse Specialist Core Competency Scale: An Exploratory Factor Analysis Jokiniemi, Krista Pietilä, Anna-Maija Mikkonen, Santtu Department of Nursing Science, activities Department of Applied Physics, activities 2021-12-17T12:48:16Z 1863-1873 https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/26628 englanti unknown Wiley Journal of clinical nursing http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15587 10.1111/jocn.15587 0962-1067 13-14 30 https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/26628 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 openAccess © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ CC-BY-NC-ND advanced practice nurse clinical nurse specialist competence exploratory factor analysis Nordic countries nurse clinician reliability validity Tieteelliset aikakauslehtiartikkelit A1 article artikkeli 2021 ftuniveasternfin https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15587 2022-12-11T06:55:08Z Aim To conduct a construct validity test on a clinical nurse specialist core competency scale. Background Clinical nurse specialists’ competency development dates back to the late 20th century; however, there is scarcity of competency descriptions from outside of North America. Furthermore, little knowledge is available on the previous research-driven efforts to develop and validate clinical nurse specialist core competencies. Design A descriptive study, using an online self-report questionnaire, was conducted from May to September 2019 in three Nordic countries. Methods An exploratory factor analysis using principal axis factoring and rotation method oblimin with Kaiser normalisation was undertaken to examine factors in the 50-item scale. Parallel analysis with eigenvalue Monte Carlo simulation and scree plot was used to determine the number of factors to extract. Psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated, and subjective interpretation was used to modify the tool in line with the statistical analysis. The STROBE checklist was used as the reporting guideline for this study. Results One hundred and eighty-four responses were obtained (Finland n = 52, Denmark n = 95, Iceland n = 37) with an overall response rate of 45%. The results provided construct validity evidence of the underlying theoretical structures of the four competency spheres of patient, nursing, organisation and scholarship. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the original overall scale was 0.94, thus indicating adequate reliability of the scale. Conclusions Based on the analysis and subjective interpretation, we suggest a 47-item clinical nurse specialist core competency scale. Further study should be conducted to validate the core competency content and construct in other contexts beyond the present study. Relevance to clinical practice The scale may be used to guide clinical nurse specialist practice and identify areas for professional development, develop graduate-level programme curricula and inform future competency research. published ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland UEF eRepository (University of Eastern Finland) Journal of Clinical Nursing 30 13-14 1863 1873
institution Open Polar
collection UEF eRepository (University of Eastern Finland)
op_collection_id ftuniveasternfin
language unknown
topic advanced practice nurse
clinical nurse specialist
competence
exploratory factor analysis
Nordic countries
nurse clinician
reliability
validity
spellingShingle advanced practice nurse
clinical nurse specialist
competence
exploratory factor analysis
Nordic countries
nurse clinician
reliability
validity
Jokiniemi, Krista
Pietilä, Anna-Maija
Mikkonen, Santtu
Construct Validity of Clinical Nurse Specialist Core Competency Scale: An Exploratory Factor Analysis
topic_facet advanced practice nurse
clinical nurse specialist
competence
exploratory factor analysis
Nordic countries
nurse clinician
reliability
validity
description Aim To conduct a construct validity test on a clinical nurse specialist core competency scale. Background Clinical nurse specialists’ competency development dates back to the late 20th century; however, there is scarcity of competency descriptions from outside of North America. Furthermore, little knowledge is available on the previous research-driven efforts to develop and validate clinical nurse specialist core competencies. Design A descriptive study, using an online self-report questionnaire, was conducted from May to September 2019 in three Nordic countries. Methods An exploratory factor analysis using principal axis factoring and rotation method oblimin with Kaiser normalisation was undertaken to examine factors in the 50-item scale. Parallel analysis with eigenvalue Monte Carlo simulation and scree plot was used to determine the number of factors to extract. Psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated, and subjective interpretation was used to modify the tool in line with the statistical analysis. The STROBE checklist was used as the reporting guideline for this study. Results One hundred and eighty-four responses were obtained (Finland n = 52, Denmark n = 95, Iceland n = 37) with an overall response rate of 45%. The results provided construct validity evidence of the underlying theoretical structures of the four competency spheres of patient, nursing, organisation and scholarship. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the original overall scale was 0.94, thus indicating adequate reliability of the scale. Conclusions Based on the analysis and subjective interpretation, we suggest a 47-item clinical nurse specialist core competency scale. Further study should be conducted to validate the core competency content and construct in other contexts beyond the present study. Relevance to clinical practice The scale may be used to guide clinical nurse specialist practice and identify areas for professional development, develop graduate-level programme curricula and inform future competency research. published ...
author2 Department of Nursing Science, activities
Department of Applied Physics, activities
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jokiniemi, Krista
Pietilä, Anna-Maija
Mikkonen, Santtu
author_facet Jokiniemi, Krista
Pietilä, Anna-Maija
Mikkonen, Santtu
author_sort Jokiniemi, Krista
title Construct Validity of Clinical Nurse Specialist Core Competency Scale: An Exploratory Factor Analysis
title_short Construct Validity of Clinical Nurse Specialist Core Competency Scale: An Exploratory Factor Analysis
title_full Construct Validity of Clinical Nurse Specialist Core Competency Scale: An Exploratory Factor Analysis
title_fullStr Construct Validity of Clinical Nurse Specialist Core Competency Scale: An Exploratory Factor Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Construct Validity of Clinical Nurse Specialist Core Competency Scale: An Exploratory Factor Analysis
title_sort construct validity of clinical nurse specialist core competency scale: an exploratory factor analysis
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/26628
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation Journal of clinical nursing
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15587
10.1111/jocn.15587
0962-1067
13-14
30
https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/26628
op_rights CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
openAccess
© 2021 The Authors
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15587
container_title Journal of Clinical Nursing
container_volume 30
container_issue 13-14
container_start_page 1863
op_container_end_page 1873
_version_ 1766042427264598016