Comparison of two time-variant forced eddy-permitting global ocean circulation models with hydrography of the Scotia Sea

A comparison between hydrographic observations and output from two realistically forced z-level global ocean circulation models (OCCAM and POCM_4C) in the Scotia Sea, South Atlantic, is described. The study region includes the southern part of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) and the northern...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Modelling
Main Authors: Thorpe, Sally E., Stevens, David P., Heywood, Karen J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/15904/
https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/15904/1/DS_36.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.04.004
id ftuniveastangl:oai:ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk:15904
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuniveastangl:oai:ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk:15904 2023-06-06T11:43:50+02:00 Comparison of two time-variant forced eddy-permitting global ocean circulation models with hydrography of the Scotia Sea Thorpe, Sally E. Stevens, David P. Heywood, Karen J. 2005 application/pdf https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/15904/ https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/15904/1/DS_36.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.04.004 en eng https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/15904/1/DS_36.pdf Thorpe, Sally E., Stevens, David P. and Heywood, Karen J. (2005) Comparison of two time-variant forced eddy-permitting global ocean circulation models with hydrography of the Scotia Sea. Ocean Modelling, 9 (2). pp. 105-132. doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.04.004 Article PeerReviewed 2005 ftuniveastangl https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.04.004 2023-04-13T22:31:21Z A comparison between hydrographic observations and output from two realistically forced z-level global ocean circulation models (OCCAM and POCM_4C) in the Scotia Sea, South Atlantic, is described. The study region includes the southern part of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) and the northern Weddell Gyre. Despite similar formulations, the models have different strengths and weaknesses. OCCAM simulates well the horizontal circulation around South Georgia but loss of Antarctic Bottom Water distorts the mean circulation in the central Scotia Sea. A poorer bathymetric dataset in POCM_4C means that the circulation is not adequately topographically steered leading to greater zonal flow and a southward shift of the fronts of the southern ACC. In a comparison with sea surface height variability data, OCCAM overestimates and POCM_4C underestimates the maximum values. Both models have higher background variability than the satellite data. Mean monthly model output is compared with a meridional hydrographic section from the study region. The regional water masses at the time of the hydrographic section (April 1995) are recognisably reproduced in both models despite some discrepancies. The surface waters are too saline in OCCAM (by 0.12–0.40) and too warm in POCM_4C (by >2 °C) suggesting problems with the air-sea surface heat and freshwater fluxes used to force both models and the models' vertical mixing parameterisations. Anomalous mixed layer properties in winter lead to inaccurate Winter Water characteristics in both models. Slumping of Circumpolar Deep Water occurs in OCCAM, associated with the loss of the bottom water. Subsurface restoration to climatology at buffer zones prevents this slumping in POCM_4C although the densest waters are not reproduced. The models overestimate the baroclinic transport of the section by up to a factor of two and simulate a significant barotropic component of transport. Overall, both models can be used in this region in ways that utilise their strengths. Further improvements ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Scotia Sea University of East Anglia: UEA Digital Repository Antarctic The Antarctic Scotia Sea Weddell Ocean Modelling 9 2 105 132
institution Open Polar
collection University of East Anglia: UEA Digital Repository
op_collection_id ftuniveastangl
language English
description A comparison between hydrographic observations and output from two realistically forced z-level global ocean circulation models (OCCAM and POCM_4C) in the Scotia Sea, South Atlantic, is described. The study region includes the southern part of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) and the northern Weddell Gyre. Despite similar formulations, the models have different strengths and weaknesses. OCCAM simulates well the horizontal circulation around South Georgia but loss of Antarctic Bottom Water distorts the mean circulation in the central Scotia Sea. A poorer bathymetric dataset in POCM_4C means that the circulation is not adequately topographically steered leading to greater zonal flow and a southward shift of the fronts of the southern ACC. In a comparison with sea surface height variability data, OCCAM overestimates and POCM_4C underestimates the maximum values. Both models have higher background variability than the satellite data. Mean monthly model output is compared with a meridional hydrographic section from the study region. The regional water masses at the time of the hydrographic section (April 1995) are recognisably reproduced in both models despite some discrepancies. The surface waters are too saline in OCCAM (by 0.12–0.40) and too warm in POCM_4C (by >2 °C) suggesting problems with the air-sea surface heat and freshwater fluxes used to force both models and the models' vertical mixing parameterisations. Anomalous mixed layer properties in winter lead to inaccurate Winter Water characteristics in both models. Slumping of Circumpolar Deep Water occurs in OCCAM, associated with the loss of the bottom water. Subsurface restoration to climatology at buffer zones prevents this slumping in POCM_4C although the densest waters are not reproduced. The models overestimate the baroclinic transport of the section by up to a factor of two and simulate a significant barotropic component of transport. Overall, both models can be used in this region in ways that utilise their strengths. Further improvements ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Thorpe, Sally E.
Stevens, David P.
Heywood, Karen J.
spellingShingle Thorpe, Sally E.
Stevens, David P.
Heywood, Karen J.
Comparison of two time-variant forced eddy-permitting global ocean circulation models with hydrography of the Scotia Sea
author_facet Thorpe, Sally E.
Stevens, David P.
Heywood, Karen J.
author_sort Thorpe, Sally E.
title Comparison of two time-variant forced eddy-permitting global ocean circulation models with hydrography of the Scotia Sea
title_short Comparison of two time-variant forced eddy-permitting global ocean circulation models with hydrography of the Scotia Sea
title_full Comparison of two time-variant forced eddy-permitting global ocean circulation models with hydrography of the Scotia Sea
title_fullStr Comparison of two time-variant forced eddy-permitting global ocean circulation models with hydrography of the Scotia Sea
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two time-variant forced eddy-permitting global ocean circulation models with hydrography of the Scotia Sea
title_sort comparison of two time-variant forced eddy-permitting global ocean circulation models with hydrography of the scotia sea
publishDate 2005
url https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/15904/
https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/15904/1/DS_36.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.04.004
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
Scotia Sea
Weddell
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
Scotia Sea
Weddell
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Scotia Sea
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Scotia Sea
op_relation https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/15904/1/DS_36.pdf
Thorpe, Sally E., Stevens, David P. and Heywood, Karen J. (2005) Comparison of two time-variant forced eddy-permitting global ocean circulation models with hydrography of the Scotia Sea. Ocean Modelling, 9 (2). pp. 105-132.
doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.04.004
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.04.004
container_title Ocean Modelling
container_volume 9
container_issue 2
container_start_page 105
op_container_end_page 132
_version_ 1767958201626525696