The influence of different aspects of grouse moorland management on nontarget bird assemblages.

Conflict between stakeholders with opposing interests can hamper biodiversity conservation. When conflicts become entrenched, evidence from applied ecology can reveal new ways forward for their management. In particular, where disagreement exists over the efficacy or ethics of management actions, re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Littlewood, Nick A., Mason, Tom H.E., Hughes, Martin, Jacques, Rob, Whittingham, Mark J., Willis, Stephen G.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: John Wiley 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dro.dur.ac.uk/29195/
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/29195/1/29195.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5613
id ftunivdurham:oai:dro.dur.ac.uk.OAI2:29195
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivdurham:oai:dro.dur.ac.uk.OAI2:29195 2023-05-15T16:08:31+02:00 The influence of different aspects of grouse moorland management on nontarget bird assemblages. Littlewood, Nick A. Mason, Tom H.E. Hughes, Martin Jacques, Rob Whittingham, Mark J. Willis, Stephen G. 2019-09-26 application/pdf http://dro.dur.ac.uk/29195/ http://dro.dur.ac.uk/29195/1/29195.pdf https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5613 unknown John Wiley dro:29195 issn:2045-7758 doi:10.1002/ece3.5613 http://dro.dur.ac.uk/29195/ https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5613 http://dro.dur.ac.uk/29195/1/29195.pdf This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. CC-BY Ecology and evolution, 2019 [Peer Reviewed Journal] Article PeerReviewed 2019 ftunivdurham https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5613 2020-06-04T22:25:53Z Conflict between stakeholders with opposing interests can hamper biodiversity conservation. When conflicts become entrenched, evidence from applied ecology can reveal new ways forward for their management. In particular, where disagreement exists over the efficacy or ethics of management actions, research clarifying the uncertain impacts of management on wildlife can move debates forwards to conciliation. Here, we explore a case‐study of entrenched conflict where uncertainty exists over the impacts of multiple management actions: namely, moorlands managed for the shooting of red grouse (willow ptarmigan) Lagopus lagopus in the United Kingdom (UK). Debate over how UK moorlands should be managed is increasingly polarized. We evaluate, for the first time at a regional scale, the relative impacts of two major moorland management practices—predator control and heather burning—on nontarget bird species of conservation concern. Birds were surveyed on 18 estates across Northern England and Southeast Scotland. Sites ranged from intensively managed grouse moors to moorland sites with no management for grouse shooting. We hypothesised that both targeted predator control and burning regimes would enhance ground‐nesting wader numbers and, as a consequence of this, and of increased grouse numbers, nontarget avian predators should also be more abundant on heavily managed sites. There were positive associations between predator control and the abundance of the three most widespread species of ground‐nesting wader: strong effects for European golden plover Pluvialis apricaria and Eurasian curlew Numenius arquata and, less strongly, for common snipe Gallinago gallinago. These effects saturated at low levels of predator control. Evidence for effects of burning was much weaker. We found no evidence of enhanced numbers of nontarget predators on heavily managed sites. Article in Journal/Newspaper Eurasian Curlew European Golden Plover Numenius arquata Pluvialis apricaria Durham University: Durham Research Online Ecology and Evolution 9 19 11089 11101
institution Open Polar
collection Durham University: Durham Research Online
op_collection_id ftunivdurham
language unknown
description Conflict between stakeholders with opposing interests can hamper biodiversity conservation. When conflicts become entrenched, evidence from applied ecology can reveal new ways forward for their management. In particular, where disagreement exists over the efficacy or ethics of management actions, research clarifying the uncertain impacts of management on wildlife can move debates forwards to conciliation. Here, we explore a case‐study of entrenched conflict where uncertainty exists over the impacts of multiple management actions: namely, moorlands managed for the shooting of red grouse (willow ptarmigan) Lagopus lagopus in the United Kingdom (UK). Debate over how UK moorlands should be managed is increasingly polarized. We evaluate, for the first time at a regional scale, the relative impacts of two major moorland management practices—predator control and heather burning—on nontarget bird species of conservation concern. Birds were surveyed on 18 estates across Northern England and Southeast Scotland. Sites ranged from intensively managed grouse moors to moorland sites with no management for grouse shooting. We hypothesised that both targeted predator control and burning regimes would enhance ground‐nesting wader numbers and, as a consequence of this, and of increased grouse numbers, nontarget avian predators should also be more abundant on heavily managed sites. There were positive associations between predator control and the abundance of the three most widespread species of ground‐nesting wader: strong effects for European golden plover Pluvialis apricaria and Eurasian curlew Numenius arquata and, less strongly, for common snipe Gallinago gallinago. These effects saturated at low levels of predator control. Evidence for effects of burning was much weaker. We found no evidence of enhanced numbers of nontarget predators on heavily managed sites.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Littlewood, Nick A.
Mason, Tom H.E.
Hughes, Martin
Jacques, Rob
Whittingham, Mark J.
Willis, Stephen G.
spellingShingle Littlewood, Nick A.
Mason, Tom H.E.
Hughes, Martin
Jacques, Rob
Whittingham, Mark J.
Willis, Stephen G.
The influence of different aspects of grouse moorland management on nontarget bird assemblages.
author_facet Littlewood, Nick A.
Mason, Tom H.E.
Hughes, Martin
Jacques, Rob
Whittingham, Mark J.
Willis, Stephen G.
author_sort Littlewood, Nick A.
title The influence of different aspects of grouse moorland management on nontarget bird assemblages.
title_short The influence of different aspects of grouse moorland management on nontarget bird assemblages.
title_full The influence of different aspects of grouse moorland management on nontarget bird assemblages.
title_fullStr The influence of different aspects of grouse moorland management on nontarget bird assemblages.
title_full_unstemmed The influence of different aspects of grouse moorland management on nontarget bird assemblages.
title_sort influence of different aspects of grouse moorland management on nontarget bird assemblages.
publisher John Wiley
publishDate 2019
url http://dro.dur.ac.uk/29195/
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/29195/1/29195.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5613
genre Eurasian Curlew
European Golden Plover
Numenius arquata
Pluvialis apricaria
genre_facet Eurasian Curlew
European Golden Plover
Numenius arquata
Pluvialis apricaria
op_source Ecology and evolution, 2019 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
op_relation dro:29195
issn:2045-7758
doi:10.1002/ece3.5613
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/29195/
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5613
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/29195/1/29195.pdf
op_rights This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5613
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 9
container_issue 19
container_start_page 11089
op_container_end_page 11101
_version_ 1766404570406191104