Deglaciation of the Eurasian ice sheet complex.

The Eurasian ice sheet complex (EISC) was the third largest ice mass during the Last Glacial Maximum with a span of over 4500 km and responsible for around 20 m of eustatic sea-level lowering. Whilst recent terrestrial and marine empirical insights have improved understanding of the chronology, patt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quaternary Science Reviews
Main Authors: Patton, H., Hubbard, A., Andreassen, K., Auriac, A., Whitehouse, P.L., Stroeven, A., Shackleton, C., Winsborrow, M., Heyman, J., Hall, A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Elsevier 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/2/22213.pdf
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/1/22213.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.05.019
id ftunivdurham:oai:dro.dur.ac.uk.OAI2:22213
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Durham University: Durham Research Online
op_collection_id ftunivdurham
language unknown
description The Eurasian ice sheet complex (EISC) was the third largest ice mass during the Last Glacial Maximum with a span of over 4500 km and responsible for around 20 m of eustatic sea-level lowering. Whilst recent terrestrial and marine empirical insights have improved understanding of the chronology, pattern and rates of retreat of this vast ice sheet, a concerted attempt to model the deglaciation of the EISC honouring these new constraints is conspicuously lacking. Here, we apply a first-order, thermomechanical ice sheet model, validated against a diverse suite of empirical data, to investigate the retreat of the EISC after 23 ka BP, directly extending the work of Patton et al. (2016) who modelled the build-up to its maximum extent. Retreat of the ice sheet complex was highly asynchronous, reflecting contrasting regional sensitivities to climate forcing, oceanic influence, and internal dynamics. Most rapid retreat was experienced across the Barents Sea sector after 17.8 ka BP when this marine-based ice sheet disintegrated at a rate of ∼670 gigatonnes per year (Gt a−1) through enhanced calving and interior dynamic thinning, driven by oceanic/atmospheric warming and exacerbated by eustatic sea-level rise. From 14.9 to 12.9 ka BP the EISC lost on average 750 Gt a−1, peaking at rates >3000 Gt a−1, roughly equally partitioned between surface melt and dynamic losses, and potentially contributing up to 2.5 m to global sea-level rise during Meltwater Pulse 1A. Independent glacio-isostatic modelling constrained by an extensive inventory of relative sea-level change corroborates our ice sheet loading history of the Barents Sea sector. Subglacial conditions were predominately temperate during deglaciation, with over 6000 subglacial lakes predicted along with an extensive subglacial drainage network. Moreover, the maximum EISC and its isostatic footprint had a profound impact on the proglacial hydrological network, forming the Fleuve Manche mega-catchment which had an area of ∼2.5 × 106 km2 and drained the present day Vistula, Elbe, Rhine and Thames rivers through the Seine Estuary. During the Bølling/Allerød oscillation after c. 14.6 ka BP, two major proglacial lakes formed in the Baltic and White seas, buffering meltwater pulses from eastern Fennoscandia through to the Younger Dryas when these massive proglacial freshwater lakes flooded into the North Atlantic Ocean. Deglaciation temporarily abated during the Younger Dryas stadial at 12.9 ka BP, when remnant ice across Svalbard, Franz Josef Land, Novaya Zemlya, Fennoscandia and Scotland experienced a short-lived but dynamic re-advance. The final stage of deglaciation converged on present day ice cover around the Scandes mountains and the Barents Sea by 8.7 ka BP, although the phase-lagged isostatic recovery still continues today.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Patton, H.
Hubbard, A.
Andreassen, K.
Auriac, A.
Whitehouse, P.L.
Stroeven, A.
Shackleton, C.
Winsborrow, M.
Heyman, J.
Hall, A.
spellingShingle Patton, H.
Hubbard, A.
Andreassen, K.
Auriac, A.
Whitehouse, P.L.
Stroeven, A.
Shackleton, C.
Winsborrow, M.
Heyman, J.
Hall, A.
Deglaciation of the Eurasian ice sheet complex.
author_facet Patton, H.
Hubbard, A.
Andreassen, K.
Auriac, A.
Whitehouse, P.L.
Stroeven, A.
Shackleton, C.
Winsborrow, M.
Heyman, J.
Hall, A.
author_sort Patton, H.
title Deglaciation of the Eurasian ice sheet complex.
title_short Deglaciation of the Eurasian ice sheet complex.
title_full Deglaciation of the Eurasian ice sheet complex.
title_fullStr Deglaciation of the Eurasian ice sheet complex.
title_full_unstemmed Deglaciation of the Eurasian ice sheet complex.
title_sort deglaciation of the eurasian ice sheet complex.
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2017
url http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/2/22213.pdf
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/1/22213.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.05.019
long_lat ENVELOPE(55.000,55.000,81.000,81.000)
geographic Barents Sea
Franz Josef Land
Svalbard
geographic_facet Barents Sea
Franz Josef Land
Svalbard
genre Barents Sea
Fennoscandia
Franz Josef Land
Ice Sheet
North Atlantic
Novaya Zemlya
Svalbard
genre_facet Barents Sea
Fennoscandia
Franz Josef Land
Ice Sheet
North Atlantic
Novaya Zemlya
Svalbard
op_source Quaternary science reviews, 2017, Vol.169, pp.148-172 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
op_relation dro:22213
issn:0277-3791
doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.05.019
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.05.019
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/2/22213.pdf
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/1/22213.pdf
op_rights © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.05.019
container_title Quaternary Science Reviews
container_volume 169
container_start_page 148
op_container_end_page 172
_version_ 1766370146614509568
spelling ftunivdurham:oai:dro.dur.ac.uk.OAI2:22213 2023-05-15T15:38:48+02:00 Deglaciation of the Eurasian ice sheet complex. Patton, H. Hubbard, A. Andreassen, K. Auriac, A. Whitehouse, P.L. Stroeven, A. Shackleton, C. Winsborrow, M. Heyman, J. Hall, A. 2017-08-01 application/pdf http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/ http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/2/22213.pdf http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/1/22213.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.05.019 unknown Elsevier dro:22213 issn:0277-3791 doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.05.019 http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.05.019 http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/2/22213.pdf http://dro.dur.ac.uk/22213/1/22213.pdf © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). CC-BY-NC-ND Quaternary science reviews, 2017, Vol.169, pp.148-172 [Peer Reviewed Journal] Article PeerReviewed 2017 ftunivdurham https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.05.019 2020-08-06T22:22:35Z The Eurasian ice sheet complex (EISC) was the third largest ice mass during the Last Glacial Maximum with a span of over 4500 km and responsible for around 20 m of eustatic sea-level lowering. Whilst recent terrestrial and marine empirical insights have improved understanding of the chronology, pattern and rates of retreat of this vast ice sheet, a concerted attempt to model the deglaciation of the EISC honouring these new constraints is conspicuously lacking. Here, we apply a first-order, thermomechanical ice sheet model, validated against a diverse suite of empirical data, to investigate the retreat of the EISC after 23 ka BP, directly extending the work of Patton et al. (2016) who modelled the build-up to its maximum extent. Retreat of the ice sheet complex was highly asynchronous, reflecting contrasting regional sensitivities to climate forcing, oceanic influence, and internal dynamics. Most rapid retreat was experienced across the Barents Sea sector after 17.8 ka BP when this marine-based ice sheet disintegrated at a rate of ∼670 gigatonnes per year (Gt a−1) through enhanced calving and interior dynamic thinning, driven by oceanic/atmospheric warming and exacerbated by eustatic sea-level rise. From 14.9 to 12.9 ka BP the EISC lost on average 750 Gt a−1, peaking at rates >3000 Gt a−1, roughly equally partitioned between surface melt and dynamic losses, and potentially contributing up to 2.5 m to global sea-level rise during Meltwater Pulse 1A. Independent glacio-isostatic modelling constrained by an extensive inventory of relative sea-level change corroborates our ice sheet loading history of the Barents Sea sector. Subglacial conditions were predominately temperate during deglaciation, with over 6000 subglacial lakes predicted along with an extensive subglacial drainage network. Moreover, the maximum EISC and its isostatic footprint had a profound impact on the proglacial hydrological network, forming the Fleuve Manche mega-catchment which had an area of ∼2.5 × 106 km2 and drained the present day Vistula, Elbe, Rhine and Thames rivers through the Seine Estuary. During the Bølling/Allerød oscillation after c. 14.6 ka BP, two major proglacial lakes formed in the Baltic and White seas, buffering meltwater pulses from eastern Fennoscandia through to the Younger Dryas when these massive proglacial freshwater lakes flooded into the North Atlantic Ocean. Deglaciation temporarily abated during the Younger Dryas stadial at 12.9 ka BP, when remnant ice across Svalbard, Franz Josef Land, Novaya Zemlya, Fennoscandia and Scotland experienced a short-lived but dynamic re-advance. The final stage of deglaciation converged on present day ice cover around the Scandes mountains and the Barents Sea by 8.7 ka BP, although the phase-lagged isostatic recovery still continues today. Article in Journal/Newspaper Barents Sea Fennoscandia Franz Josef Land Ice Sheet North Atlantic Novaya Zemlya Svalbard Durham University: Durham Research Online Barents Sea Franz Josef Land ENVELOPE(55.000,55.000,81.000,81.000) Svalbard Quaternary Science Reviews 169 148 172