Glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the Barents Sea ice sheet : a modelling inter-comparison.

The 3D geometrical evolution of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet (BSIS), particularly during its late-glacial retreat phase, remains largely ambiguous due to the paucity of direct marine- and terrestrial-based evidence constraining its horizontal and vertical extent and chronology. One way of validating th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quaternary Science Reviews
Main Authors: Auriac, A., Whitehouse, P.L., Bentley, M.J., Patton, H., Lloyd, J.M., Hubbard, A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Elsevier 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dro.dur.ac.uk/19436/
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/19436/1/19436.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.011
id ftunivdurham:oai:dro.dur.ac.uk.OAI2:19436
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivdurham:oai:dro.dur.ac.uk.OAI2:19436 2023-05-15T15:38:33+02:00 Glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the Barents Sea ice sheet : a modelling inter-comparison. Auriac, A. Whitehouse, P.L. Bentley, M.J. Patton, H. Lloyd, J.M. Hubbard, A. 2016-09-01 application/pdf http://dro.dur.ac.uk/19436/ http://dro.dur.ac.uk/19436/1/19436.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.011 unknown Elsevier dro:19436 issn:0277-3791 doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.011 http://dro.dur.ac.uk/19436/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.011 http://dro.dur.ac.uk/19436/1/19436.pdf © 2016 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ CC-BY-NC-ND Quaternary science reviews, 2016, Vol.147, pp.122-135 [Peer Reviewed Journal] Article PeerReviewed 2016 ftunivdurham https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.011 2020-06-04T22:23:13Z The 3D geometrical evolution of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet (BSIS), particularly during its late-glacial retreat phase, remains largely ambiguous due to the paucity of direct marine- and terrestrial-based evidence constraining its horizontal and vertical extent and chronology. One way of validating the numerous BSIS reconstructions previously proposed is to collate and apply them under a wide range of Earth models and to compare prognostic (isostatic) output through time with known relative sea-level (RSL) data. Here we compare six contrasting BSIS load scenarios via a spherical Earth system model and derive a best-fit, χ2 parameter using RSL data from the four main terrestrial regions within the domain: Svalbard, Franz Josef Land, Novaya Zemlya and northern Norway. Poor χ2 values allow two load scenarios to be dismissed, leaving four that agree well with RSL observations. The remaining four scenarios optimally fit the RSL data when combined with Earth models that have an upper mantle viscosity of 0.2–2 × 1021 Pa s, while there is less sensitivity to the lithosphere thickness (ranging from 71 to 120 km) and lower mantle viscosity (spanning 1–50 × 1021 Pa s). GPS observations are also compared with predictions of present-day uplift across the Barents Sea. Key locations where relative sea-level and GPS data would prove critical in constraining future ice-sheet modelling efforts are also identified. Article in Journal/Newspaper Barents Sea Franz Josef Land Ice Sheet Northern Norway Novaya Zemlya Sea ice Svalbard Durham University: Durham Research Online Barents Sea Franz Josef Land ENVELOPE(55.000,55.000,81.000,81.000) Norway Svalbard Quaternary Science Reviews 147 122 135
institution Open Polar
collection Durham University: Durham Research Online
op_collection_id ftunivdurham
language unknown
description The 3D geometrical evolution of the Barents Sea Ice Sheet (BSIS), particularly during its late-glacial retreat phase, remains largely ambiguous due to the paucity of direct marine- and terrestrial-based evidence constraining its horizontal and vertical extent and chronology. One way of validating the numerous BSIS reconstructions previously proposed is to collate and apply them under a wide range of Earth models and to compare prognostic (isostatic) output through time with known relative sea-level (RSL) data. Here we compare six contrasting BSIS load scenarios via a spherical Earth system model and derive a best-fit, χ2 parameter using RSL data from the four main terrestrial regions within the domain: Svalbard, Franz Josef Land, Novaya Zemlya and northern Norway. Poor χ2 values allow two load scenarios to be dismissed, leaving four that agree well with RSL observations. The remaining four scenarios optimally fit the RSL data when combined with Earth models that have an upper mantle viscosity of 0.2–2 × 1021 Pa s, while there is less sensitivity to the lithosphere thickness (ranging from 71 to 120 km) and lower mantle viscosity (spanning 1–50 × 1021 Pa s). GPS observations are also compared with predictions of present-day uplift across the Barents Sea. Key locations where relative sea-level and GPS data would prove critical in constraining future ice-sheet modelling efforts are also identified.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Auriac, A.
Whitehouse, P.L.
Bentley, M.J.
Patton, H.
Lloyd, J.M.
Hubbard, A.
spellingShingle Auriac, A.
Whitehouse, P.L.
Bentley, M.J.
Patton, H.
Lloyd, J.M.
Hubbard, A.
Glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the Barents Sea ice sheet : a modelling inter-comparison.
author_facet Auriac, A.
Whitehouse, P.L.
Bentley, M.J.
Patton, H.
Lloyd, J.M.
Hubbard, A.
author_sort Auriac, A.
title Glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the Barents Sea ice sheet : a modelling inter-comparison.
title_short Glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the Barents Sea ice sheet : a modelling inter-comparison.
title_full Glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the Barents Sea ice sheet : a modelling inter-comparison.
title_fullStr Glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the Barents Sea ice sheet : a modelling inter-comparison.
title_full_unstemmed Glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the Barents Sea ice sheet : a modelling inter-comparison.
title_sort glacial isostatic adjustment associated with the barents sea ice sheet : a modelling inter-comparison.
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2016
url http://dro.dur.ac.uk/19436/
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/19436/1/19436.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.011
long_lat ENVELOPE(55.000,55.000,81.000,81.000)
geographic Barents Sea
Franz Josef Land
Norway
Svalbard
geographic_facet Barents Sea
Franz Josef Land
Norway
Svalbard
genre Barents Sea
Franz Josef Land
Ice Sheet
Northern Norway
Novaya Zemlya
Sea ice
Svalbard
genre_facet Barents Sea
Franz Josef Land
Ice Sheet
Northern Norway
Novaya Zemlya
Sea ice
Svalbard
op_source Quaternary science reviews, 2016, Vol.147, pp.122-135 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
op_relation dro:19436
issn:0277-3791
doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.011
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/19436/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.011
http://dro.dur.ac.uk/19436/1/19436.pdf
op_rights © 2016 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.011
container_title Quaternary Science Reviews
container_volume 147
container_start_page 122
op_container_end_page 135
_version_ 1766369590027223040