Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia)
Judicial independence as a value and principle of the legal system becomes a subjective right so that any citizen can come to its defense. Offenses to the independence of judges and magistrates, external or internal, can be alleged before the courts without the need to demonstrate specific or concre...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad de Deusto
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495 https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.2495 |
id |
ftunivdeustoojs:oai:ojs.revistas.deusto.es:article/2495 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivdeustoojs:oai:ojs.revistas.deusto.es:article/2495 2023-06-11T04:13:20+02:00 Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia) Derecho al Derecho. Independencia judicial y exclusiva dependencia a la Ley (A propósito de la STEDH Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia) Álvarez-Ossorio Micheo, Fernando 2022-06-27 application/pdf text/html https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495 https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.2495 spa spa Universidad de Deusto https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495/2935 https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495/2983 https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495 doi:10.18543/ed.2495 Derechos de autor 2022 Universidad de Deusto Estudios de Deusto; Vol. 70 No. 1 (2022); 55-79 Estudios de Deusto; Vol. 70 Núm. 1 (2022); 55-79 Estudios de Deusto; bol: 70 zk: 1 (2022); 55-79 2386-9062 0423-4847 10.18543/ed7012022 Judicial independence right to an independent court rule of law Independence of the justice system separation of powers Independencia judicial derecho a un tribunal independiente Estado de Derecho imperio de la ley división de poderes info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2022 ftunivdeustoojs https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.249510.18543/ed7012022 2023-04-28T08:52:31Z Judicial independence as a value and principle of the legal system becomes a subjective right so that any citizen can come to its defense. Offenses to the independence of judges and magistrates, external or internal, can be alleged before the courts without the need to demonstrate specific or concrete damage, that is, even in situations in which the actions of the justice system have not shown partiality. This individual right to an independent judge is intended to protect the trust that citizens must have in justice, that is, to safeguard the power of the State that is responsible for guaranteeing the indemnity of the legal system at the time of its application from unlawful pressure. In these pages we will analyze, based on a pilot judgment of the ECHR, how judicial independence is a subjective right designed to defend the rule of law. Received: 29.05.2022Accepted: 14.06.2022 La independencia judicial como valor y principio del sistema jurídico se reviste de derecho subjetivo para que cualquier ciudadano pueda salir en su defensa. Las afrentas a la independencia de los jueces y magistrados, externas o internas, pueden ser alegadas ante los tribunales sin necesidad de demostrar un daño específico o concreto, es decir, incluso en situaciones en que la actuación de la justicia no haya dado muestras de parcialidad. Este derecho individual a un juez independiente tiene como objeto la protección de la confianza que los ciudadanos han de tener en la justicia, es decir, la salvaguarda del poder del Estado que se ocupa de garantizar la indemnidad del ordenamiento jurídico en el momento de su aplicación frente a presiones ilegítimas. En estas páginas analizaremos, a partir de una sentencia piloto del TEDH, como la independencia judicial es un derecho subjetivo pensado para la defensa del Estado de Derecho. Recibido: 29.05.2022Aceptado: 14.06.2022 Article in Journal/Newspaper Islandia Unknown Derecho ENVELOPE(-56.950,-56.950,-64.350,-64.350) Independencia ENVELOPE(-63.100,-63.100,-64.817,-64.817) Andri ENVELOPE(-14.100,-14.100,65.117,65.117) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
ftunivdeustoojs |
language |
Spanish |
topic |
Judicial independence right to an independent court rule of law Independence of the justice system separation of powers Independencia judicial derecho a un tribunal independiente Estado de Derecho imperio de la ley división de poderes |
spellingShingle |
Judicial independence right to an independent court rule of law Independence of the justice system separation of powers Independencia judicial derecho a un tribunal independiente Estado de Derecho imperio de la ley división de poderes Álvarez-Ossorio Micheo, Fernando Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia) |
topic_facet |
Judicial independence right to an independent court rule of law Independence of the justice system separation of powers Independencia judicial derecho a un tribunal independiente Estado de Derecho imperio de la ley división de poderes |
description |
Judicial independence as a value and principle of the legal system becomes a subjective right so that any citizen can come to its defense. Offenses to the independence of judges and magistrates, external or internal, can be alleged before the courts without the need to demonstrate specific or concrete damage, that is, even in situations in which the actions of the justice system have not shown partiality. This individual right to an independent judge is intended to protect the trust that citizens must have in justice, that is, to safeguard the power of the State that is responsible for guaranteeing the indemnity of the legal system at the time of its application from unlawful pressure. In these pages we will analyze, based on a pilot judgment of the ECHR, how judicial independence is a subjective right designed to defend the rule of law. Received: 29.05.2022Accepted: 14.06.2022 La independencia judicial como valor y principio del sistema jurídico se reviste de derecho subjetivo para que cualquier ciudadano pueda salir en su defensa. Las afrentas a la independencia de los jueces y magistrados, externas o internas, pueden ser alegadas ante los tribunales sin necesidad de demostrar un daño específico o concreto, es decir, incluso en situaciones en que la actuación de la justicia no haya dado muestras de parcialidad. Este derecho individual a un juez independiente tiene como objeto la protección de la confianza que los ciudadanos han de tener en la justicia, es decir, la salvaguarda del poder del Estado que se ocupa de garantizar la indemnidad del ordenamiento jurídico en el momento de su aplicación frente a presiones ilegítimas. En estas páginas analizaremos, a partir de una sentencia piloto del TEDH, como la independencia judicial es un derecho subjetivo pensado para la defensa del Estado de Derecho. Recibido: 29.05.2022Aceptado: 14.06.2022 |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Álvarez-Ossorio Micheo, Fernando |
author_facet |
Álvarez-Ossorio Micheo, Fernando |
author_sort |
Álvarez-Ossorio Micheo, Fernando |
title |
Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia) |
title_short |
Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia) |
title_full |
Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia) |
title_fullStr |
Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia) |
title_sort |
independence of the justice system. rule of law as human right (case of gudmundur andri astrádsson c. islandia) |
publisher |
Universidad de Deusto |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495 https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.2495 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-56.950,-56.950,-64.350,-64.350) ENVELOPE(-63.100,-63.100,-64.817,-64.817) ENVELOPE(-14.100,-14.100,65.117,65.117) |
geographic |
Derecho Independencia Andri |
geographic_facet |
Derecho Independencia Andri |
genre |
Islandia |
genre_facet |
Islandia |
op_source |
Estudios de Deusto; Vol. 70 No. 1 (2022); 55-79 Estudios de Deusto; Vol. 70 Núm. 1 (2022); 55-79 Estudios de Deusto; bol: 70 zk: 1 (2022); 55-79 2386-9062 0423-4847 10.18543/ed7012022 |
op_relation |
https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495/2935 https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495/2983 https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495 doi:10.18543/ed.2495 |
op_rights |
Derechos de autor 2022 Universidad de Deusto |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.249510.18543/ed7012022 |
_version_ |
1768390247117225984 |