Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia)

Judicial independence as a value and principle of the legal system becomes a subjective right so that any citizen can come to its defense. Offenses to the independence of judges and magistrates, external or internal, can be alleged before the courts without the need to demonstrate specific or concre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Álvarez-Ossorio Micheo, Fernando
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad de Deusto 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495
https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.2495
id ftunivdeustoojs:oai:ojs.revistas.deusto.es:article/2495
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivdeustoojs:oai:ojs.revistas.deusto.es:article/2495 2023-06-11T04:13:20+02:00 Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia) Derecho al Derecho. Independencia judicial y exclusiva dependencia a la Ley (A propósito de la STEDH Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia) Álvarez-Ossorio Micheo, Fernando 2022-06-27 application/pdf text/html https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495 https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.2495 spa spa Universidad de Deusto https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495/2935 https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495/2983 https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495 doi:10.18543/ed.2495 Derechos de autor 2022 Universidad de Deusto Estudios de Deusto; Vol. 70 No. 1 (2022); 55-79 Estudios de Deusto; Vol. 70 Núm. 1 (2022); 55-79 Estudios de Deusto; bol: 70 zk: 1 (2022); 55-79 2386-9062 0423-4847 10.18543/ed7012022 Judicial independence right to an independent court rule of law Independence of the justice system separation of powers Independencia judicial derecho a un tribunal independiente Estado de Derecho imperio de la ley división de poderes info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2022 ftunivdeustoojs https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.249510.18543/ed7012022 2023-04-28T08:52:31Z Judicial independence as a value and principle of the legal system becomes a subjective right so that any citizen can come to its defense. Offenses to the independence of judges and magistrates, external or internal, can be alleged before the courts without the need to demonstrate specific or concrete damage, that is, even in situations in which the actions of the justice system have not shown partiality. This individual right to an independent judge is intended to protect the trust that citizens must have in justice, that is, to safeguard the power of the State that is responsible for guaranteeing the indemnity of the legal system at the time of its application from unlawful pressure. In these pages we will analyze, based on a pilot judgment of the ECHR, how judicial independence is a subjective right designed to defend the rule of law. Received: 29.05.2022Accepted: 14.06.2022 La independencia judicial como valor y principio del sistema jurídico se reviste de derecho subjetivo para que cualquier ciudadano pueda salir en su defensa. Las afrentas a la independencia de los jueces y magistrados, externas o internas, pueden ser alegadas ante los tribunales sin necesidad de demostrar un daño específico o concreto, es decir, incluso en situaciones en que la actuación de la justicia no haya dado muestras de parcialidad. Este derecho individual a un juez independiente tiene como objeto la protección de la confianza que los ciudadanos han de tener en la justicia, es decir, la salvaguarda del poder del Estado que se ocupa de garantizar la indemnidad del ordenamiento jurídico en el momento de su aplicación frente a presiones ilegítimas. En estas páginas analizaremos, a partir de una sentencia piloto del TEDH, como la independencia judicial es un derecho subjetivo pensado para la defensa del Estado de Derecho. Recibido: 29.05.2022Aceptado: 14.06.2022 Article in Journal/Newspaper Islandia Unknown Derecho ENVELOPE(-56.950,-56.950,-64.350,-64.350) Independencia ENVELOPE(-63.100,-63.100,-64.817,-64.817) Andri ENVELOPE(-14.100,-14.100,65.117,65.117)
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftunivdeustoojs
language Spanish
topic Judicial independence
right to an independent court
rule of law
Independence of the justice system
separation of powers
Independencia judicial
derecho a un tribunal independiente
Estado de Derecho
imperio de la ley
división de poderes
spellingShingle Judicial independence
right to an independent court
rule of law
Independence of the justice system
separation of powers
Independencia judicial
derecho a un tribunal independiente
Estado de Derecho
imperio de la ley
división de poderes
Álvarez-Ossorio Micheo, Fernando
Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia)
topic_facet Judicial independence
right to an independent court
rule of law
Independence of the justice system
separation of powers
Independencia judicial
derecho a un tribunal independiente
Estado de Derecho
imperio de la ley
división de poderes
description Judicial independence as a value and principle of the legal system becomes a subjective right so that any citizen can come to its defense. Offenses to the independence of judges and magistrates, external or internal, can be alleged before the courts without the need to demonstrate specific or concrete damage, that is, even in situations in which the actions of the justice system have not shown partiality. This individual right to an independent judge is intended to protect the trust that citizens must have in justice, that is, to safeguard the power of the State that is responsible for guaranteeing the indemnity of the legal system at the time of its application from unlawful pressure. In these pages we will analyze, based on a pilot judgment of the ECHR, how judicial independence is a subjective right designed to defend the rule of law. Received: 29.05.2022Accepted: 14.06.2022 La independencia judicial como valor y principio del sistema jurídico se reviste de derecho subjetivo para que cualquier ciudadano pueda salir en su defensa. Las afrentas a la independencia de los jueces y magistrados, externas o internas, pueden ser alegadas ante los tribunales sin necesidad de demostrar un daño específico o concreto, es decir, incluso en situaciones en que la actuación de la justicia no haya dado muestras de parcialidad. Este derecho individual a un juez independiente tiene como objeto la protección de la confianza que los ciudadanos han de tener en la justicia, es decir, la salvaguarda del poder del Estado que se ocupa de garantizar la indemnidad del ordenamiento jurídico en el momento de su aplicación frente a presiones ilegítimas. En estas páginas analizaremos, a partir de una sentencia piloto del TEDH, como la independencia judicial es un derecho subjetivo pensado para la defensa del Estado de Derecho. Recibido: 29.05.2022Aceptado: 14.06.2022
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Álvarez-Ossorio Micheo, Fernando
author_facet Álvarez-Ossorio Micheo, Fernando
author_sort Álvarez-Ossorio Micheo, Fernando
title Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia)
title_short Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia)
title_full Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia)
title_fullStr Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia)
title_full_unstemmed Independence of the justice system. Rule of Law as Human Right (Case of Gudmundur Andri Astrádsson c. Islandia)
title_sort independence of the justice system. rule of law as human right (case of gudmundur andri astrádsson c. islandia)
publisher Universidad de Deusto
publishDate 2022
url https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495
https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.2495
long_lat ENVELOPE(-56.950,-56.950,-64.350,-64.350)
ENVELOPE(-63.100,-63.100,-64.817,-64.817)
ENVELOPE(-14.100,-14.100,65.117,65.117)
geographic Derecho
Independencia
Andri
geographic_facet Derecho
Independencia
Andri
genre Islandia
genre_facet Islandia
op_source Estudios de Deusto; Vol. 70 No. 1 (2022); 55-79
Estudios de Deusto; Vol. 70 Núm. 1 (2022); 55-79
Estudios de Deusto; bol: 70 zk: 1 (2022); 55-79
2386-9062
0423-4847
10.18543/ed7012022
op_relation https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495/2935
https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495/2983
https://revista-estudios.revistas.deusto.es/article/view/2495
doi:10.18543/ed.2495
op_rights Derechos de autor 2022 Universidad de Deusto
op_doi https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.249510.18543/ed7012022
_version_ 1768390247117225984