Cross-national comparisons of image associations with "global warming" and "climate change" among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain

• Published in: Journal of Risk Research
• Main Authors: Lorenzoni, Irene, Leiserowitz, Anthony, Doria, Miguel De Franca, Poortinga, Wouter, Pidgeon, Nicholas Frank
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: unknown
• Published: Routledge 2006
• Subjects: GE Environmental Sciences; North Atlantic
• Online Access: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/9501/; http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13669870600613658; https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870600613658

Climate change poses significant risks to societies worldwide, yet governmental responses differ greatly on either side of the North Atlantic. Risk perception studies have shown that citizens in the United States and Great Britain have similar risk perceptions of climate change: it is considered a distant threat, of limited personal importance. Engaging the public on this issue is thus challenging. Affect, the positive or negative evaluation of an object, idea, or mental image, has been shown to powerfully influence individual processing of information and decision‐making. This paper explores the affective images underlying public risk perceptions of climate change through comparative findings from national surveys in the USA and in Great Britain. American and British respondents predominantly referred to generic manifestations and impacts of climate change or to a different environmental problem (ozone depletion). The terms “global warming” and “climate change”, and their associated images, evoked negative affective responses from most respondents. Personally relevant impacts, causes, and solutions to climate change, were rarely mentioned, indicating that climate change is psychologically distant for most individuals in both nations. The role of affective images in risk judgements and individual decision‐making deserves greater study.