The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe

Researchers exploring rock decay hail from chemistry, engineering, geography, geology, paleoclimatology, soil science, and other disciplines and use laboratory, microscopic, theoretical, and field-based strategies. We illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork forms the core knowledge of rock de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geomorphology
Main Authors: Dorn, Ron, Gordon, Steven, Allen, Casey, Cerveny, Niccole, Dixon, John, Groom, Kaelin, Hall, Kevin, Harrison, Emma, Mol, Lisa, Paradise, Thomas, Sumner, Paul, Thompson, Tyler, Turkington, Alice
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Elsevier 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/72752/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012
id ftunivcardiff:oai:https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk:72752
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcardiff:oai:https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk:72752 2023-05-15T15:08:15+02:00 The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe Dorn, Ron Gordon, Steven Allen, Casey Cerveny, Niccole Dixon, John Groom, Kaelin Hall, Kevin Harrison, Emma Mol, Lisa Paradise, Thomas Sumner, Paul Thompson, Tyler Turkington, Alice 2013-10-15 https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/72752/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 unknown Elsevier Dorn, Ron, Gordon, Steven, Allen, Casey, Cerveny, Niccole, Dixon, John, Groom, Kaelin, Hall, Kevin, Harrison, Emma, Mol, Lisa https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/view/cardiffauthors/A15263523.html orcid:0000-0001-5272-3671 orcid:0000-0001-5272-3671, Paradise, Thomas, Sumner, Paul, Thompson, Tyler and Turkington, Alice 2013. The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe. Geomorphology 200 , pp. 59-74. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 G Geography (General) Article PeerReviewed 2013 ftunivcardiff https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 2022-11-03T23:32:41Z Researchers exploring rock decay hail from chemistry, engineering, geography, geology, paleoclimatology, soil science, and other disciplines and use laboratory, microscopic, theoretical, and field-based strategies. We illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork forms the core knowledge of rock decay and continues to build on the classic research of Blackwelder, Bryan, Gilbert, Jutson, King, Linton, Twidale, and von Humboldt. While development of nonfield-based investigation has contributed substantially to our understanding of processes, the wide range of environments, stone types, and climatic variability encountered raises issues of temporal and spatial scales too complex to fit into attempts at universal modeling. Although nonfield methods are immensely useful for understanding overarching processes, they can miss subtle differences in factors that ultimately shape rock surfaces. We, therefore, illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork continues today alongside laboratory and computer-based investigations and contributes to our understanding of rock decay processes. This includes the contribution of fieldwork to the learning process of undergraduates, the calculation of activation energies of plagioclase and olivine dissolution, the high Arctic, the discovery of a new global carbon sink, the influence of plant roots, an analysis of the need for protocols, tafoni development, stone monuments, and rock coatings. These compiled vignettes argue that, despite revolutionary advances in instrumentation, rock decay research must remain firmly footed in the field. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Cardiff University: ORCA (Online Research @ Cardiff) Arctic Geomorphology 200 59 74
institution Open Polar
collection Cardiff University: ORCA (Online Research @ Cardiff)
op_collection_id ftunivcardiff
language unknown
topic G Geography (General)
spellingShingle G Geography (General)
Dorn, Ron
Gordon, Steven
Allen, Casey
Cerveny, Niccole
Dixon, John
Groom, Kaelin
Hall, Kevin
Harrison, Emma
Mol, Lisa
Paradise, Thomas
Sumner, Paul
Thompson, Tyler
Turkington, Alice
The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe
topic_facet G Geography (General)
description Researchers exploring rock decay hail from chemistry, engineering, geography, geology, paleoclimatology, soil science, and other disciplines and use laboratory, microscopic, theoretical, and field-based strategies. We illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork forms the core knowledge of rock decay and continues to build on the classic research of Blackwelder, Bryan, Gilbert, Jutson, King, Linton, Twidale, and von Humboldt. While development of nonfield-based investigation has contributed substantially to our understanding of processes, the wide range of environments, stone types, and climatic variability encountered raises issues of temporal and spatial scales too complex to fit into attempts at universal modeling. Although nonfield methods are immensely useful for understanding overarching processes, they can miss subtle differences in factors that ultimately shape rock surfaces. We, therefore, illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork continues today alongside laboratory and computer-based investigations and contributes to our understanding of rock decay processes. This includes the contribution of fieldwork to the learning process of undergraduates, the calculation of activation energies of plagioclase and olivine dissolution, the high Arctic, the discovery of a new global carbon sink, the influence of plant roots, an analysis of the need for protocols, tafoni development, stone monuments, and rock coatings. These compiled vignettes argue that, despite revolutionary advances in instrumentation, rock decay research must remain firmly footed in the field.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Dorn, Ron
Gordon, Steven
Allen, Casey
Cerveny, Niccole
Dixon, John
Groom, Kaelin
Hall, Kevin
Harrison, Emma
Mol, Lisa
Paradise, Thomas
Sumner, Paul
Thompson, Tyler
Turkington, Alice
author_facet Dorn, Ron
Gordon, Steven
Allen, Casey
Cerveny, Niccole
Dixon, John
Groom, Kaelin
Hall, Kevin
Harrison, Emma
Mol, Lisa
Paradise, Thomas
Sumner, Paul
Thompson, Tyler
Turkington, Alice
author_sort Dorn, Ron
title The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe
title_short The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe
title_full The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe
title_fullStr The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe
title_full_unstemmed The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe
title_sort role of fieldwork in rock decay research: case studies from the fringe
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2013
url https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/72752/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation Dorn, Ron, Gordon, Steven, Allen, Casey, Cerveny, Niccole, Dixon, John, Groom, Kaelin, Hall, Kevin, Harrison, Emma, Mol, Lisa https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/view/cardiffauthors/A15263523.html orcid:0000-0001-5272-3671 orcid:0000-0001-5272-3671, Paradise, Thomas, Sumner, Paul, Thompson, Tyler and Turkington, Alice 2013. The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe. Geomorphology 200 , pp. 59-74. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012
doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012
container_title Geomorphology
container_volume 200
container_start_page 59
op_container_end_page 74
_version_ 1766339651343220736