The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe
Researchers exploring rock decay hail from chemistry, engineering, geography, geology, paleoclimatology, soil science, and other disciplines and use laboratory, microscopic, theoretical, and field-based strategies. We illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork forms the core knowledge of rock de...
Published in: | Geomorphology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Elsevier
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/72752/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 |
id |
ftunivcardiff:oai:https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk:72752 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivcardiff:oai:https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk:72752 2023-05-15T15:08:15+02:00 The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe Dorn, Ron Gordon, Steven Allen, Casey Cerveny, Niccole Dixon, John Groom, Kaelin Hall, Kevin Harrison, Emma Mol, Lisa Paradise, Thomas Sumner, Paul Thompson, Tyler Turkington, Alice 2013-10-15 https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/72752/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 unknown Elsevier Dorn, Ron, Gordon, Steven, Allen, Casey, Cerveny, Niccole, Dixon, John, Groom, Kaelin, Hall, Kevin, Harrison, Emma, Mol, Lisa https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/view/cardiffauthors/A15263523.html orcid:0000-0001-5272-3671 orcid:0000-0001-5272-3671, Paradise, Thomas, Sumner, Paul, Thompson, Tyler and Turkington, Alice 2013. The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe. Geomorphology 200 , pp. 59-74. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 G Geography (General) Article PeerReviewed 2013 ftunivcardiff https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 2022-11-03T23:32:41Z Researchers exploring rock decay hail from chemistry, engineering, geography, geology, paleoclimatology, soil science, and other disciplines and use laboratory, microscopic, theoretical, and field-based strategies. We illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork forms the core knowledge of rock decay and continues to build on the classic research of Blackwelder, Bryan, Gilbert, Jutson, King, Linton, Twidale, and von Humboldt. While development of nonfield-based investigation has contributed substantially to our understanding of processes, the wide range of environments, stone types, and climatic variability encountered raises issues of temporal and spatial scales too complex to fit into attempts at universal modeling. Although nonfield methods are immensely useful for understanding overarching processes, they can miss subtle differences in factors that ultimately shape rock surfaces. We, therefore, illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork continues today alongside laboratory and computer-based investigations and contributes to our understanding of rock decay processes. This includes the contribution of fieldwork to the learning process of undergraduates, the calculation of activation energies of plagioclase and olivine dissolution, the high Arctic, the discovery of a new global carbon sink, the influence of plant roots, an analysis of the need for protocols, tafoni development, stone monuments, and rock coatings. These compiled vignettes argue that, despite revolutionary advances in instrumentation, rock decay research must remain firmly footed in the field. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Cardiff University: ORCA (Online Research @ Cardiff) Arctic Geomorphology 200 59 74 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cardiff University: ORCA (Online Research @ Cardiff) |
op_collection_id |
ftunivcardiff |
language |
unknown |
topic |
G Geography (General) |
spellingShingle |
G Geography (General) Dorn, Ron Gordon, Steven Allen, Casey Cerveny, Niccole Dixon, John Groom, Kaelin Hall, Kevin Harrison, Emma Mol, Lisa Paradise, Thomas Sumner, Paul Thompson, Tyler Turkington, Alice The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe |
topic_facet |
G Geography (General) |
description |
Researchers exploring rock decay hail from chemistry, engineering, geography, geology, paleoclimatology, soil science, and other disciplines and use laboratory, microscopic, theoretical, and field-based strategies. We illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork forms the core knowledge of rock decay and continues to build on the classic research of Blackwelder, Bryan, Gilbert, Jutson, King, Linton, Twidale, and von Humboldt. While development of nonfield-based investigation has contributed substantially to our understanding of processes, the wide range of environments, stone types, and climatic variability encountered raises issues of temporal and spatial scales too complex to fit into attempts at universal modeling. Although nonfield methods are immensely useful for understanding overarching processes, they can miss subtle differences in factors that ultimately shape rock surfaces. We, therefore, illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork continues today alongside laboratory and computer-based investigations and contributes to our understanding of rock decay processes. This includes the contribution of fieldwork to the learning process of undergraduates, the calculation of activation energies of plagioclase and olivine dissolution, the high Arctic, the discovery of a new global carbon sink, the influence of plant roots, an analysis of the need for protocols, tafoni development, stone monuments, and rock coatings. These compiled vignettes argue that, despite revolutionary advances in instrumentation, rock decay research must remain firmly footed in the field. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Dorn, Ron Gordon, Steven Allen, Casey Cerveny, Niccole Dixon, John Groom, Kaelin Hall, Kevin Harrison, Emma Mol, Lisa Paradise, Thomas Sumner, Paul Thompson, Tyler Turkington, Alice |
author_facet |
Dorn, Ron Gordon, Steven Allen, Casey Cerveny, Niccole Dixon, John Groom, Kaelin Hall, Kevin Harrison, Emma Mol, Lisa Paradise, Thomas Sumner, Paul Thompson, Tyler Turkington, Alice |
author_sort |
Dorn, Ron |
title |
The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe |
title_short |
The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe |
title_full |
The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe |
title_fullStr |
The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe |
title_sort |
role of fieldwork in rock decay research: case studies from the fringe |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/72752/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_relation |
Dorn, Ron, Gordon, Steven, Allen, Casey, Cerveny, Niccole, Dixon, John, Groom, Kaelin, Hall, Kevin, Harrison, Emma, Mol, Lisa https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/view/cardiffauthors/A15263523.html orcid:0000-0001-5272-3671 orcid:0000-0001-5272-3671, Paradise, Thomas, Sumner, Paul, Thompson, Tyler and Turkington, Alice 2013. The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe. Geomorphology 200 , pp. 59-74. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 |
container_title |
Geomorphology |
container_volume |
200 |
container_start_page |
59 |
op_container_end_page |
74 |
_version_ |
1766339651343220736 |