Separating southern blue whale subspecies based on length frequencies of sexually mature females

When sexually mature, Antarctic (true) blue whales are substantially longer than pygmy blue whales. To estimate the proportions of these two subspecies in various regions, Bayesian mixture models were fitted to catch length frequencies of sexually mature females. The extent of rounding to 5-ft inter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Mammal Science
Main Authors: Branch, Trevor A, Abubaker, E M N, Mkango, S, Butterworth, Doug S
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17290
id ftunivcapetownir:oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/17290
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcapetownir:oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/17290 2024-09-15T17:42:32+00:00 Separating southern blue whale subspecies based on length frequencies of sexually mature females Branch, Trevor A Abubaker, E M N Mkango, S Butterworth, Doug S 2007 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17290 eng eng Wiley Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group Faculty of Science University of Cape Town http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17290 Marine Mammal Science http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-7692 balaenoptera musculus intermedia B. m. brevicauda blue whale mixture models Bayesian Journal Article 2007 ftunivcapetownir https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-7692 2024-06-25T03:38:08Z When sexually mature, Antarctic (true) blue whales are substantially longer than pygmy blue whales. To estimate the proportions of these two subspecies in various regions, Bayesian mixture models were fitted to catch length frequencies of sexually mature females. The extent of rounding to 5-ft intervals was also estimated. Antarctic blue whales dominated (99.2%) pelagic catches south of 52°S, whereas pygmy blue whales dominated (99.9%) north of 52°S and in 35°–180°E. South of 60°S, only 0.7% (95% credibility interval 0.5%–1.0%) were pygmy blue whales, lower than the 7% upper bound currently assumed. Shore-based catches from SW Africa and those before 1937 from South Georgia and the South Shetlands were estimated to contain 90%–92% Antarctic blue whales. Actual proportions were probably higher, but these data show evidence of rounding (up to 19% of records), poor length-estimation methods, and other problems. The mean length of sexually mature female Chilean blue whales (77.1 ft, 23.5 m) was intermediate between pygmy (68.9 ft, 21.0 m) and Antarctic blue whales (83.4–86.3 ft, 25.4–26.6 m). A good fit to these data was obtained only by assuming that the Chilean whales are a separate subspecies or distinctive population. This finding is also consistent with their discrete distribution, and genetic and call type differences, compared to Antarctic and pygmy blue whales. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Balaenoptera musculus Blue whale University of Cape Town: OpenUCT Marine Mammal Science
institution Open Polar
collection University of Cape Town: OpenUCT
op_collection_id ftunivcapetownir
language English
topic balaenoptera musculus intermedia
B. m. brevicauda
blue whale
mixture models
Bayesian
spellingShingle balaenoptera musculus intermedia
B. m. brevicauda
blue whale
mixture models
Bayesian
Branch, Trevor A
Abubaker, E M N
Mkango, S
Butterworth, Doug S
Separating southern blue whale subspecies based on length frequencies of sexually mature females
topic_facet balaenoptera musculus intermedia
B. m. brevicauda
blue whale
mixture models
Bayesian
description When sexually mature, Antarctic (true) blue whales are substantially longer than pygmy blue whales. To estimate the proportions of these two subspecies in various regions, Bayesian mixture models were fitted to catch length frequencies of sexually mature females. The extent of rounding to 5-ft intervals was also estimated. Antarctic blue whales dominated (99.2%) pelagic catches south of 52°S, whereas pygmy blue whales dominated (99.9%) north of 52°S and in 35°–180°E. South of 60°S, only 0.7% (95% credibility interval 0.5%–1.0%) were pygmy blue whales, lower than the 7% upper bound currently assumed. Shore-based catches from SW Africa and those before 1937 from South Georgia and the South Shetlands were estimated to contain 90%–92% Antarctic blue whales. Actual proportions were probably higher, but these data show evidence of rounding (up to 19% of records), poor length-estimation methods, and other problems. The mean length of sexually mature female Chilean blue whales (77.1 ft, 23.5 m) was intermediate between pygmy (68.9 ft, 21.0 m) and Antarctic blue whales (83.4–86.3 ft, 25.4–26.6 m). A good fit to these data was obtained only by assuming that the Chilean whales are a separate subspecies or distinctive population. This finding is also consistent with their discrete distribution, and genetic and call type differences, compared to Antarctic and pygmy blue whales.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Branch, Trevor A
Abubaker, E M N
Mkango, S
Butterworth, Doug S
author_facet Branch, Trevor A
Abubaker, E M N
Mkango, S
Butterworth, Doug S
author_sort Branch, Trevor A
title Separating southern blue whale subspecies based on length frequencies of sexually mature females
title_short Separating southern blue whale subspecies based on length frequencies of sexually mature females
title_full Separating southern blue whale subspecies based on length frequencies of sexually mature females
title_fullStr Separating southern blue whale subspecies based on length frequencies of sexually mature females
title_full_unstemmed Separating southern blue whale subspecies based on length frequencies of sexually mature females
title_sort separating southern blue whale subspecies based on length frequencies of sexually mature females
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2007
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17290
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Balaenoptera musculus
Blue whale
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Balaenoptera musculus
Blue whale
op_source Marine Mammal Science
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-7692
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17290
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-7692
container_title Marine Mammal Science
_version_ 1810489128841641984