Ecosystem services

Antarctic ecosystem services have begun to be assessed formally only in recent years and they have not been quantified or otherwise calculated in a comprehensive and consistent manner. This report summarises some of what has been done in this regard, identifying tools and methods used to calculate t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pepperall, Neree, Shalev, Amit, Snodgrass, Joe
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/18570
id ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/18570
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/18570 2023-05-15T13:49:08+02:00 Ecosystem services Pepperall, Neree Shalev, Amit Snodgrass, Joe 2019 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10092/18570 English en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10092/18570 All Rights Reserved Reports 2019 ftunivcanter 2022-09-08T13:40:06Z Antarctic ecosystem services have begun to be assessed formally only in recent years and they have not been quantified or otherwise calculated in a comprehensive and consistent manner. This report summarises some of what has been done in this regard, identifying tools and methods used to calculate these ecosystem services and examining approaches used for valuation as well as the explicit and implicit valuations driven by the Antarctic Treaty System. The report discusses some implications of valuation and their potential ramifications on utilisation and governance, taking the point that ecosystem services valuation should not be approached purely with market-driven methods, and that where those approaches are used, they must capture indirect costs in addition to direct costs and benefits from the get-go. The risks of doing otherwise include not just unbalanced utilisation but the potential destabilisation of the Antarctic Treaty System itself. As such, communication approaches and materials, whether originating from national Antarctic programs and researchers and aimed at the public or at governance bodies, or whether originating from governance bodies and aimed at their greater stakeholders and governments, should reflect and articulate valuation methods that consider many interdependent considerations. Further, they should shape their communications with an eye toward multidisciplinary audiences and thus avoid narrow, domain-specific perspectives. Report Antarc* Antarctic University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository Antarctic The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository
op_collection_id ftunivcanter
language English
description Antarctic ecosystem services have begun to be assessed formally only in recent years and they have not been quantified or otherwise calculated in a comprehensive and consistent manner. This report summarises some of what has been done in this regard, identifying tools and methods used to calculate these ecosystem services and examining approaches used for valuation as well as the explicit and implicit valuations driven by the Antarctic Treaty System. The report discusses some implications of valuation and their potential ramifications on utilisation and governance, taking the point that ecosystem services valuation should not be approached purely with market-driven methods, and that where those approaches are used, they must capture indirect costs in addition to direct costs and benefits from the get-go. The risks of doing otherwise include not just unbalanced utilisation but the potential destabilisation of the Antarctic Treaty System itself. As such, communication approaches and materials, whether originating from national Antarctic programs and researchers and aimed at the public or at governance bodies, or whether originating from governance bodies and aimed at their greater stakeholders and governments, should reflect and articulate valuation methods that consider many interdependent considerations. Further, they should shape their communications with an eye toward multidisciplinary audiences and thus avoid narrow, domain-specific perspectives.
format Report
author Pepperall, Neree
Shalev, Amit
Snodgrass, Joe
spellingShingle Pepperall, Neree
Shalev, Amit
Snodgrass, Joe
Ecosystem services
author_facet Pepperall, Neree
Shalev, Amit
Snodgrass, Joe
author_sort Pepperall, Neree
title Ecosystem services
title_short Ecosystem services
title_full Ecosystem services
title_fullStr Ecosystem services
title_full_unstemmed Ecosystem services
title_sort ecosystem services
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/18570
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10092/18570
op_rights All Rights Reserved
_version_ 1766250905289621504