The future of Antarctic governance

The Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) is now situated in a vastly changed environmental and geopolitical context from the one in which it was conceived and developed. Looking ahead, future trajectories for human activities in the Antarctic and their governance are numerous and uncertain. This necessitat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Day, Thalia, Freer, Bryony, Gardiner, Natasha, Irvine, Henry
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/18564
id ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/18564
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/18564 2023-05-15T13:49:25+02:00 The future of Antarctic governance Day, Thalia Freer, Bryony Gardiner, Natasha Irvine, Henry 2019 application/msword http://hdl.handle.net/10092/18564 English en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10092/18564 All Rights Reserved Reports 2019 ftunivcanter 2022-09-08T13:33:31Z The Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) is now situated in a vastly changed environmental and geopolitical context from the one in which it was conceived and developed. Looking ahead, future trajectories for human activities in the Antarctic and their governance are numerous and uncertain. This necessitates an interdisciplinary examination of the ATS, so that the extent to which it can survive as a successful governance regime in the face of future challenges can be determined, and active changes made accordingly. Here, the foundational values of the ATS – peace, science, cooperation – are shown as a useful basis to evaluate its current challenges. Through detailed case-studies of whaling and IUU fishing, weaknesses that characterise the system at present are exposed. These pertain to exploited ambiguity, avoidance of key issues, misalignment with other international agreements and enforcement. Subsequently, exploitative human activities in the Antarctic by 2050 are considered in terms of the emerging drivers of global change. Given the shortcomings identified, the ATS in its current form is deemed inadequate to deal with such issues. Thus, it cannot survive without amendment beyond 2100. The paper closes with strategic recommendations, directed at addressing each of the current weaknesses, made in the view that a re-focus and reimagination of the ATS’ foundational values could reignite this faultering governance regime. Report Antarc* Antarctic University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository Antarctic The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository
op_collection_id ftunivcanter
language English
description The Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) is now situated in a vastly changed environmental and geopolitical context from the one in which it was conceived and developed. Looking ahead, future trajectories for human activities in the Antarctic and their governance are numerous and uncertain. This necessitates an interdisciplinary examination of the ATS, so that the extent to which it can survive as a successful governance regime in the face of future challenges can be determined, and active changes made accordingly. Here, the foundational values of the ATS – peace, science, cooperation – are shown as a useful basis to evaluate its current challenges. Through detailed case-studies of whaling and IUU fishing, weaknesses that characterise the system at present are exposed. These pertain to exploited ambiguity, avoidance of key issues, misalignment with other international agreements and enforcement. Subsequently, exploitative human activities in the Antarctic by 2050 are considered in terms of the emerging drivers of global change. Given the shortcomings identified, the ATS in its current form is deemed inadequate to deal with such issues. Thus, it cannot survive without amendment beyond 2100. The paper closes with strategic recommendations, directed at addressing each of the current weaknesses, made in the view that a re-focus and reimagination of the ATS’ foundational values could reignite this faultering governance regime.
format Report
author Day, Thalia
Freer, Bryony
Gardiner, Natasha
Irvine, Henry
spellingShingle Day, Thalia
Freer, Bryony
Gardiner, Natasha
Irvine, Henry
The future of Antarctic governance
author_facet Day, Thalia
Freer, Bryony
Gardiner, Natasha
Irvine, Henry
author_sort Day, Thalia
title The future of Antarctic governance
title_short The future of Antarctic governance
title_full The future of Antarctic governance
title_fullStr The future of Antarctic governance
title_full_unstemmed The future of Antarctic governance
title_sort future of antarctic governance
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/18564
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10092/18564
op_rights All Rights Reserved
_version_ 1766251324193636352