Exclusive Economic Zones: Should they be allowed in Antarctic waters?

In the first half Of the twentieth Century, seven states made claims, in some instances conflicting claims, to parts of Antarctica. Political, practical and scientific factors during this time led to the 1959 Antarctic Treaty being agreed upon. This accord placed all existing claims to Antarctic ter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lawlor, Stephanie, Rae, Andrew, Ross, Emily, Strinemann, Ingrid
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14342
id ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14342
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14342 2023-05-15T13:49:08+02:00 Exclusive Economic Zones: Should they be allowed in Antarctic waters? Lawlor, Stephanie Rae, Andrew Ross, Emily Strinemann, Ingrid 2003 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14342 English en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14342 All Rights Reserved Theses / Dissertations 2003 ftunivcanter 2022-09-08T13:39:44Z In the first half Of the twentieth Century, seven states made claims, in some instances conflicting claims, to parts of Antarctica. Political, practical and scientific factors during this time led to the 1959 Antarctic Treaty being agreed upon. This accord placed all existing claims to Antarctic territory in abeyance and prevented new claims from being asserted. Concurrently, the intemational "law Of the sea" was being negotiated. Several versions were elaborated, with the final document, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), entering into force in 1994. UNCLOS provides for and defines the delimitation of maritime zones, which includes exclusive economic zones (EEZs). Recently, some Antarctic claimant states have indicated that they intend to establish an EEZ which would extend into the Southern Ocean from their Antarctic territory. This paper considers the international law applicable to establishing an EEZ in Antarctic waters and concludes: The declaration of an EEZ is a declaration of sovereignty and is therefore a breach of Article IV of the Antarctic Treaty; the recognition Of an Antarctic EEZ would not lend credence to any Of the terrestrial claims held in abeyance under the Antarctic Treaty; the issue of EEZs in Antarctic waters is unlikely to destabilize the Antarctic Treaty System; and, the present-day application of exclusive economic zones in the Antarctic is inoperable until the Antarctic Treaty dissolves and territorial sovereignty on the continent is resolved. This scenario is undesirable and arguably unworkable as there is a strong case for Antarctica and the Southern Ocean being preserved as the common heritage Of mankind. In the first half Of the twentieth Century, seven states made claims, in some instances conflicting claims, to parts of Antarctica. Political, practical and scientific factors during this time led to the 1959 Antarctic Treaty being agreed upon. This accord placed all existing claims to Antarctic territory in abeyance and prevented new claims from being ... Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Southern Ocean University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository Antarctic Southern Ocean The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository
op_collection_id ftunivcanter
language English
description In the first half Of the twentieth Century, seven states made claims, in some instances conflicting claims, to parts of Antarctica. Political, practical and scientific factors during this time led to the 1959 Antarctic Treaty being agreed upon. This accord placed all existing claims to Antarctic territory in abeyance and prevented new claims from being asserted. Concurrently, the intemational "law Of the sea" was being negotiated. Several versions were elaborated, with the final document, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), entering into force in 1994. UNCLOS provides for and defines the delimitation of maritime zones, which includes exclusive economic zones (EEZs). Recently, some Antarctic claimant states have indicated that they intend to establish an EEZ which would extend into the Southern Ocean from their Antarctic territory. This paper considers the international law applicable to establishing an EEZ in Antarctic waters and concludes: The declaration of an EEZ is a declaration of sovereignty and is therefore a breach of Article IV of the Antarctic Treaty; the recognition Of an Antarctic EEZ would not lend credence to any Of the terrestrial claims held in abeyance under the Antarctic Treaty; the issue of EEZs in Antarctic waters is unlikely to destabilize the Antarctic Treaty System; and, the present-day application of exclusive economic zones in the Antarctic is inoperable until the Antarctic Treaty dissolves and territorial sovereignty on the continent is resolved. This scenario is undesirable and arguably unworkable as there is a strong case for Antarctica and the Southern Ocean being preserved as the common heritage Of mankind. In the first half Of the twentieth Century, seven states made claims, in some instances conflicting claims, to parts of Antarctica. Political, practical and scientific factors during this time led to the 1959 Antarctic Treaty being agreed upon. This accord placed all existing claims to Antarctic territory in abeyance and prevented new claims from being ...
format Other/Unknown Material
author Lawlor, Stephanie
Rae, Andrew
Ross, Emily
Strinemann, Ingrid
spellingShingle Lawlor, Stephanie
Rae, Andrew
Ross, Emily
Strinemann, Ingrid
Exclusive Economic Zones: Should they be allowed in Antarctic waters?
author_facet Lawlor, Stephanie
Rae, Andrew
Ross, Emily
Strinemann, Ingrid
author_sort Lawlor, Stephanie
title Exclusive Economic Zones: Should they be allowed in Antarctic waters?
title_short Exclusive Economic Zones: Should they be allowed in Antarctic waters?
title_full Exclusive Economic Zones: Should they be allowed in Antarctic waters?
title_fullStr Exclusive Economic Zones: Should they be allowed in Antarctic waters?
title_full_unstemmed Exclusive Economic Zones: Should they be allowed in Antarctic waters?
title_sort exclusive economic zones: should they be allowed in antarctic waters?
publishDate 2003
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14342
geographic Antarctic
Southern Ocean
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Southern Ocean
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14342
op_rights All Rights Reserved
_version_ 1766250902273916928