The South Pole Route; a Necessity or a Scar on the Landscape?
Controversy surrounds the United State's National Science Foundation's (NSF) current construction Of a route between McMurdo Station, Ross Island, and Amunsden-Scott South Pole Station. Attitudes to the Route cover a wide spectrum. Proponents Of large-scale science consider it a necessity,...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Other/Unknown Material |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14338 |
id |
ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14338 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14338 2023-05-15T13:55:49+02:00 The South Pole Route; a Necessity or a Scar on the Landscape? Beaumont, Stefan Chilton, Mike Godson, Lloyd Wright, Neville van der Beek, Olaf 2004 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14338 English en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14338 All Rights Reserved Theses / Dissertations 2004 ftunivcanter 2022-09-08T13:28:12Z Controversy surrounds the United State's National Science Foundation's (NSF) current construction Of a route between McMurdo Station, Ross Island, and Amunsden-Scott South Pole Station. Attitudes to the Route cover a wide spectrum. Proponents Of large-scale science consider it a necessity, in that it satisfies logistical demands and frees projects from the constraints Of air- cargo space. Others argue that, rather than a necessity, it is a cost-cutting exercise dictated by the primacy given to science in Antarctica. Some view the Route as a potential scar on both the physical landscape and the ideological landscape Of the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS), through the compromising Of the aesthetic and wilderness values that the ATS seeks to preserve; or the creation Of national boundaries. Yet Others regard the NSF's approach to the requisite Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) with suspicion. These varying attitudes focus attention on issues Of contemporary importance to the ATS. Controversy surrounds the United State's National Science Foundation's (NSF) current construction Of a route between McMurdo Station, Ross Island, and Amunsden-Scott South Pole Station. Attitudes to the Route cover a wide spectrum. Proponents Of large-scale science consider it a necessity, in that it satisfies logistical demands and frees projects from the constraints Of air- cargo space. Others argue that, rather than a necessity, it is a cost-cutting exercise dictated by the primacy given to science in Antarctica. Some view the Route as a potential scar on both the physical landscape and the ideological landscape Of the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS), through the compromising Of the aesthetic and wilderness values that the ATS seeks to preserve; or the creation Of national boundaries. Yet Others regard the NSF's approach to the requisite Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) with suspicion. These varying attitudes focus attention on issues Of contemporary importance to the ATS. Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Ross Island South pole South pole University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository Antarctic Eia ENVELOPE(7.755,7.755,63.024,63.024) McMurdo Station ENVELOPE(166.667,166.667,-77.850,-77.850) Ross Island South Pole The Antarctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository |
op_collection_id |
ftunivcanter |
language |
English |
description |
Controversy surrounds the United State's National Science Foundation's (NSF) current construction Of a route between McMurdo Station, Ross Island, and Amunsden-Scott South Pole Station. Attitudes to the Route cover a wide spectrum. Proponents Of large-scale science consider it a necessity, in that it satisfies logistical demands and frees projects from the constraints Of air- cargo space. Others argue that, rather than a necessity, it is a cost-cutting exercise dictated by the primacy given to science in Antarctica. Some view the Route as a potential scar on both the physical landscape and the ideological landscape Of the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS), through the compromising Of the aesthetic and wilderness values that the ATS seeks to preserve; or the creation Of national boundaries. Yet Others regard the NSF's approach to the requisite Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) with suspicion. These varying attitudes focus attention on issues Of contemporary importance to the ATS. Controversy surrounds the United State's National Science Foundation's (NSF) current construction Of a route between McMurdo Station, Ross Island, and Amunsden-Scott South Pole Station. Attitudes to the Route cover a wide spectrum. Proponents Of large-scale science consider it a necessity, in that it satisfies logistical demands and frees projects from the constraints Of air- cargo space. Others argue that, rather than a necessity, it is a cost-cutting exercise dictated by the primacy given to science in Antarctica. Some view the Route as a potential scar on both the physical landscape and the ideological landscape Of the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS), through the compromising Of the aesthetic and wilderness values that the ATS seeks to preserve; or the creation Of national boundaries. Yet Others regard the NSF's approach to the requisite Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) with suspicion. These varying attitudes focus attention on issues Of contemporary importance to the ATS. |
format |
Other/Unknown Material |
author |
Beaumont, Stefan Chilton, Mike Godson, Lloyd Wright, Neville van der Beek, Olaf |
spellingShingle |
Beaumont, Stefan Chilton, Mike Godson, Lloyd Wright, Neville van der Beek, Olaf The South Pole Route; a Necessity or a Scar on the Landscape? |
author_facet |
Beaumont, Stefan Chilton, Mike Godson, Lloyd Wright, Neville van der Beek, Olaf |
author_sort |
Beaumont, Stefan |
title |
The South Pole Route; a Necessity or a Scar on the Landscape? |
title_short |
The South Pole Route; a Necessity or a Scar on the Landscape? |
title_full |
The South Pole Route; a Necessity or a Scar on the Landscape? |
title_fullStr |
The South Pole Route; a Necessity or a Scar on the Landscape? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The South Pole Route; a Necessity or a Scar on the Landscape? |
title_sort |
south pole route; a necessity or a scar on the landscape? |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14338 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(7.755,7.755,63.024,63.024) ENVELOPE(166.667,166.667,-77.850,-77.850) |
geographic |
Antarctic Eia McMurdo Station Ross Island South Pole The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic Eia McMurdo Station Ross Island South Pole The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Ross Island South pole South pole |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Ross Island South pole South pole |
op_relation |
http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14338 |
op_rights |
All Rights Reserved |
_version_ |
1766262666658054144 |