Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System?

The Antarctic Treaty System operates primarily through consensus. However, increasing membership and associated problems in finding consensus, have led some to question the merits of the system. Analysis through evaluative criteria shows that consensus decision-making is critical to the stability an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brockett, David, Clarke, Linda, Lindsay, Margaret, Scherzer, Jorn, Wilson, Brent
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14334
id ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14334
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14334 2023-05-15T13:59:52+02:00 Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Brockett, David Clarke, Linda Lindsay, Margaret Scherzer, Jorn Wilson, Brent 2005 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14334 English en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14334 All Rights Reserved Theses / Dissertations 2005 ftunivcanter 2022-09-08T13:41:51Z The Antarctic Treaty System operates primarily through consensus. However, increasing membership and associated problems in finding consensus, have led some to question the merits of the system. Analysis through evaluative criteria shows that consensus decision-making is critical to the stability and functioning Of the Antarctic Treaty System. Intangible benefits inherent with consensus decision-making, such as sense Of unity, political stability, common purpose and commitment, are as imponant to the Antarctic Treaty System as are sensible outcomes. Rather than altering the cunent decision-making mechanism, this analysis shows that in- creased focus on the process of enhancing the effectiveness of consensus decision-making is the preferred approach to mitigating these issues. Consensus remains the most stable and appropriate decision-making model for the Antarc- tic Treaty System today. The Antarctic Treaty System operates primarily through consensus. However, increasing membership and associated problems in finding consensus, have led some to question the merits of the system. Analysis through evaluative criteria shows that consensus decision-making is critical to the stability and functioning Of the Antarctic Treaty System. Intangible benefits inherent with consensus decision-making, such as sense Of unity, political stability, common purpose and commitment, are as imponant to the Antarctic Treaty System as are sensible outcomes. Rather than altering the cunent decision-making mechanism, this analysis shows that in- creased focus on the process of enhancing the effectiveness of consensus decision-making is the preferred approach to mitigating these issues. Consensus remains the most stable and appropriate decision-making model for the Antarc- tic Treaty System today. Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository Antarctic The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository
op_collection_id ftunivcanter
language English
description The Antarctic Treaty System operates primarily through consensus. However, increasing membership and associated problems in finding consensus, have led some to question the merits of the system. Analysis through evaluative criteria shows that consensus decision-making is critical to the stability and functioning Of the Antarctic Treaty System. Intangible benefits inherent with consensus decision-making, such as sense Of unity, political stability, common purpose and commitment, are as imponant to the Antarctic Treaty System as are sensible outcomes. Rather than altering the cunent decision-making mechanism, this analysis shows that in- creased focus on the process of enhancing the effectiveness of consensus decision-making is the preferred approach to mitigating these issues. Consensus remains the most stable and appropriate decision-making model for the Antarc- tic Treaty System today. The Antarctic Treaty System operates primarily through consensus. However, increasing membership and associated problems in finding consensus, have led some to question the merits of the system. Analysis through evaluative criteria shows that consensus decision-making is critical to the stability and functioning Of the Antarctic Treaty System. Intangible benefits inherent with consensus decision-making, such as sense Of unity, political stability, common purpose and commitment, are as imponant to the Antarctic Treaty System as are sensible outcomes. Rather than altering the cunent decision-making mechanism, this analysis shows that in- creased focus on the process of enhancing the effectiveness of consensus decision-making is the preferred approach to mitigating these issues. Consensus remains the most stable and appropriate decision-making model for the Antarc- tic Treaty System today.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Brockett, David
Clarke, Linda
Lindsay, Margaret
Scherzer, Jorn
Wilson, Brent
spellingShingle Brockett, David
Clarke, Linda
Lindsay, Margaret
Scherzer, Jorn
Wilson, Brent
Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System?
author_facet Brockett, David
Clarke, Linda
Lindsay, Margaret
Scherzer, Jorn
Wilson, Brent
author_sort Brockett, David
title Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System?
title_short Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System?
title_full Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System?
title_fullStr Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System?
title_full_unstemmed Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System?
title_sort consensus in the antarctic treaty system does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the antarctic treaty system? consensus in the antarctic treaty system does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the antarctic treaty system?
publishDate 2005
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14334
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14334
op_rights All Rights Reserved
_version_ 1766268776735571968