Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System?
The Antarctic Treaty System operates primarily through consensus. However, increasing membership and associated problems in finding consensus, have led some to question the merits of the system. Analysis through evaluative criteria shows that consensus decision-making is critical to the stability an...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Other/Unknown Material |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14334 |
id |
ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14334 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14334 2023-05-15T13:59:52+02:00 Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Brockett, David Clarke, Linda Lindsay, Margaret Scherzer, Jorn Wilson, Brent 2005 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14334 English en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14334 All Rights Reserved Theses / Dissertations 2005 ftunivcanter 2022-09-08T13:41:51Z The Antarctic Treaty System operates primarily through consensus. However, increasing membership and associated problems in finding consensus, have led some to question the merits of the system. Analysis through evaluative criteria shows that consensus decision-making is critical to the stability and functioning Of the Antarctic Treaty System. Intangible benefits inherent with consensus decision-making, such as sense Of unity, political stability, common purpose and commitment, are as imponant to the Antarctic Treaty System as are sensible outcomes. Rather than altering the cunent decision-making mechanism, this analysis shows that in- creased focus on the process of enhancing the effectiveness of consensus decision-making is the preferred approach to mitigating these issues. Consensus remains the most stable and appropriate decision-making model for the Antarc- tic Treaty System today. The Antarctic Treaty System operates primarily through consensus. However, increasing membership and associated problems in finding consensus, have led some to question the merits of the system. Analysis through evaluative criteria shows that consensus decision-making is critical to the stability and functioning Of the Antarctic Treaty System. Intangible benefits inherent with consensus decision-making, such as sense Of unity, political stability, common purpose and commitment, are as imponant to the Antarctic Treaty System as are sensible outcomes. Rather than altering the cunent decision-making mechanism, this analysis shows that in- creased focus on the process of enhancing the effectiveness of consensus decision-making is the preferred approach to mitigating these issues. Consensus remains the most stable and appropriate decision-making model for the Antarc- tic Treaty System today. Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository Antarctic The Antarctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository |
op_collection_id |
ftunivcanter |
language |
English |
description |
The Antarctic Treaty System operates primarily through consensus. However, increasing membership and associated problems in finding consensus, have led some to question the merits of the system. Analysis through evaluative criteria shows that consensus decision-making is critical to the stability and functioning Of the Antarctic Treaty System. Intangible benefits inherent with consensus decision-making, such as sense Of unity, political stability, common purpose and commitment, are as imponant to the Antarctic Treaty System as are sensible outcomes. Rather than altering the cunent decision-making mechanism, this analysis shows that in- creased focus on the process of enhancing the effectiveness of consensus decision-making is the preferred approach to mitigating these issues. Consensus remains the most stable and appropriate decision-making model for the Antarc- tic Treaty System today. The Antarctic Treaty System operates primarily through consensus. However, increasing membership and associated problems in finding consensus, have led some to question the merits of the system. Analysis through evaluative criteria shows that consensus decision-making is critical to the stability and functioning Of the Antarctic Treaty System. Intangible benefits inherent with consensus decision-making, such as sense Of unity, political stability, common purpose and commitment, are as imponant to the Antarctic Treaty System as are sensible outcomes. Rather than altering the cunent decision-making mechanism, this analysis shows that in- creased focus on the process of enhancing the effectiveness of consensus decision-making is the preferred approach to mitigating these issues. Consensus remains the most stable and appropriate decision-making model for the Antarc- tic Treaty System today. |
format |
Other/Unknown Material |
author |
Brockett, David Clarke, Linda Lindsay, Margaret Scherzer, Jorn Wilson, Brent |
spellingShingle |
Brockett, David Clarke, Linda Lindsay, Margaret Scherzer, Jorn Wilson, Brent Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? |
author_facet |
Brockett, David Clarke, Linda Lindsay, Margaret Scherzer, Jorn Wilson, Brent |
author_sort |
Brockett, David |
title |
Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? |
title_short |
Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? |
title_full |
Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? |
title_fullStr |
Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? Consensus in the Antarctic Treaty System Does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the Antarctic Treaty System? |
title_sort |
consensus in the antarctic treaty system does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the antarctic treaty system? consensus in the antarctic treaty system does a consensus voting system make good sense today within the antarctic treaty system? |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14334 |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic |
op_relation |
http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14334 |
op_rights |
All Rights Reserved |
_version_ |
1766268776735571968 |