Cessation of Whaling in Antarctic Waters - A Case for Regulation under the Antarctic Treaty

The group’s investigations were to determine if the Cessation of whaling in Antarctic waters is a case for regulation under the Antarctic treaty. It was found that the treaty is an apolitical document with no exclusive title or duress under national or international regulation. That is, an area owne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dahlenburg, Jessika, Hodgson, Jasmine, Madden, Celia, Toland, Eleanor
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14321
id ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14321
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14321 2023-05-15T13:55:49+02:00 Cessation of Whaling in Antarctic Waters - A Case for Regulation under the Antarctic Treaty Dahlenburg, Jessika Hodgson, Jasmine Madden, Celia Toland, Eleanor 2010 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14321 English en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14321 All Rights Reserved Theses / Dissertations 2010 ftunivcanter 2022-09-08T13:31:15Z The group’s investigations were to determine if the Cessation of whaling in Antarctic waters is a case for regulation under the Antarctic treaty. It was found that the treaty is an apolitical document with no exclusive title or duress under national or international regulation. That is, an area owned by no one but managed by everyone. The Japanese Whaling Research Program states that sustainable use and management of all marine resources should be based on proper scientific findings however, Japan’s research can be difficult to access and to translate. Japan states they need to kill whales to find out their age, diets and sex. But Australian and New Zealand scientists are using non-lethal methods to do similar research without having to kill the whales. Their methods include obtaining faeces and skin samples for diet and age respectively. The Australian branch of the Humane Society International took the Japanese whalers to court due to a breach in the Australia’s Environmental Protection Act. Following four years of deliberation the Federal Court awarded the Australians victory and issued an injunction against Japanese whalers who were hunting in Australia’s claimed area. This injunction however, has been largely ignored by Japan. The court case and its results placed strain on the tenuous relationships under the Antarctic Treaty System. Adding further strain is Greenpeace who consider themselves to be ‘leading’ the struggle against whaling. Greenpeace and other anti-whaling organisations believe that the Japanese Scientific whaling program was invented to disguise the fact that whales are being hunted for their meat. Prolonged deaths of whales are considered deeply unethical by anti-whaling nations. According to the Japanese culture, whaling is considered a vital part of national identity with historical importance dating back until at least the 12th Century. Furthermore there are factions between different environmental groups, with organisations such as Sea Shepherd believing more extreme action against ... Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository Antarctic New Zealand The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository
op_collection_id ftunivcanter
language English
description The group’s investigations were to determine if the Cessation of whaling in Antarctic waters is a case for regulation under the Antarctic treaty. It was found that the treaty is an apolitical document with no exclusive title or duress under national or international regulation. That is, an area owned by no one but managed by everyone. The Japanese Whaling Research Program states that sustainable use and management of all marine resources should be based on proper scientific findings however, Japan’s research can be difficult to access and to translate. Japan states they need to kill whales to find out their age, diets and sex. But Australian and New Zealand scientists are using non-lethal methods to do similar research without having to kill the whales. Their methods include obtaining faeces and skin samples for diet and age respectively. The Australian branch of the Humane Society International took the Japanese whalers to court due to a breach in the Australia’s Environmental Protection Act. Following four years of deliberation the Federal Court awarded the Australians victory and issued an injunction against Japanese whalers who were hunting in Australia’s claimed area. This injunction however, has been largely ignored by Japan. The court case and its results placed strain on the tenuous relationships under the Antarctic Treaty System. Adding further strain is Greenpeace who consider themselves to be ‘leading’ the struggle against whaling. Greenpeace and other anti-whaling organisations believe that the Japanese Scientific whaling program was invented to disguise the fact that whales are being hunted for their meat. Prolonged deaths of whales are considered deeply unethical by anti-whaling nations. According to the Japanese culture, whaling is considered a vital part of national identity with historical importance dating back until at least the 12th Century. Furthermore there are factions between different environmental groups, with organisations such as Sea Shepherd believing more extreme action against ...
format Other/Unknown Material
author Dahlenburg, Jessika
Hodgson, Jasmine
Madden, Celia
Toland, Eleanor
spellingShingle Dahlenburg, Jessika
Hodgson, Jasmine
Madden, Celia
Toland, Eleanor
Cessation of Whaling in Antarctic Waters - A Case for Regulation under the Antarctic Treaty
author_facet Dahlenburg, Jessika
Hodgson, Jasmine
Madden, Celia
Toland, Eleanor
author_sort Dahlenburg, Jessika
title Cessation of Whaling in Antarctic Waters - A Case for Regulation under the Antarctic Treaty
title_short Cessation of Whaling in Antarctic Waters - A Case for Regulation under the Antarctic Treaty
title_full Cessation of Whaling in Antarctic Waters - A Case for Regulation under the Antarctic Treaty
title_fullStr Cessation of Whaling in Antarctic Waters - A Case for Regulation under the Antarctic Treaty
title_full_unstemmed Cessation of Whaling in Antarctic Waters - A Case for Regulation under the Antarctic Treaty
title_sort cessation of whaling in antarctic waters - a case for regulation under the antarctic treaty
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14321
geographic Antarctic
New Zealand
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
New Zealand
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14321
op_rights All Rights Reserved
_version_ 1766262693545639936