Communicating Antarctic Climate Science

Many societal-political aspects of climate change act as barriers to positive climate change action. Despite the efforts of scientific researchers, stakeholders and the media, effective and accurate communication of Antarctic science is below an acceptable standard. The findings and implications of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schroeter, Serena, Lowther, Nick, Kelman, Emma, Marcus, Arnold
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14304
id ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14304
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14304 2023-05-15T13:49:08+02:00 Communicating Antarctic Climate Science Schroeter, Serena Lowther, Nick Kelman, Emma Marcus, Arnold 2015 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14304 English en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14304 All Rights Reserved Theses / Dissertations 2015 ftunivcanter 2022-09-08T13:40:19Z Many societal-political aspects of climate change act as barriers to positive climate change action. Despite the efforts of scientific researchers, stakeholders and the media, effective and accurate communication of Antarctic science is below an acceptable standard. The findings and implications of high-quality Antarctic climate change science are failing to resonate with civil society and policy makers, dictating the need to reevaluate how members of society cognitively approach the contentious issue of climate change and how current Antarctic science communication resources are distributed. An individual’s worldview, cognitive mindset and religious dogmas in conjunction with misreporting and misinterpretation of climate science are all factors influencing how an individual responds to the climate change message but rarely have they been analysed together as a complete overview. In this report, we introduce a new approach, advising that climate scientists, policy makers and other relevant stakeholders are involved in all stages of science acquisition, legislation and decision making through a targeted boundary committee, strongly integrated with a thorough education, outreach and communication (EOC) approach, within SCAR, and tasked with communicating Antarctic science and its global teleconnections. We draw on the barriers identified through literature investigation to establish this recommendation. The incorporation of a strong EOC approach in climate science communication will provide the catalyst required for substantial climate change action. Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic SCAR University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository
op_collection_id ftunivcanter
language English
description Many societal-political aspects of climate change act as barriers to positive climate change action. Despite the efforts of scientific researchers, stakeholders and the media, effective and accurate communication of Antarctic science is below an acceptable standard. The findings and implications of high-quality Antarctic climate change science are failing to resonate with civil society and policy makers, dictating the need to reevaluate how members of society cognitively approach the contentious issue of climate change and how current Antarctic science communication resources are distributed. An individual’s worldview, cognitive mindset and religious dogmas in conjunction with misreporting and misinterpretation of climate science are all factors influencing how an individual responds to the climate change message but rarely have they been analysed together as a complete overview. In this report, we introduce a new approach, advising that climate scientists, policy makers and other relevant stakeholders are involved in all stages of science acquisition, legislation and decision making through a targeted boundary committee, strongly integrated with a thorough education, outreach and communication (EOC) approach, within SCAR, and tasked with communicating Antarctic science and its global teleconnections. We draw on the barriers identified through literature investigation to establish this recommendation. The incorporation of a strong EOC approach in climate science communication will provide the catalyst required for substantial climate change action.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Schroeter, Serena
Lowther, Nick
Kelman, Emma
Marcus, Arnold
spellingShingle Schroeter, Serena
Lowther, Nick
Kelman, Emma
Marcus, Arnold
Communicating Antarctic Climate Science
author_facet Schroeter, Serena
Lowther, Nick
Kelman, Emma
Marcus, Arnold
author_sort Schroeter, Serena
title Communicating Antarctic Climate Science
title_short Communicating Antarctic Climate Science
title_full Communicating Antarctic Climate Science
title_fullStr Communicating Antarctic Climate Science
title_full_unstemmed Communicating Antarctic Climate Science
title_sort communicating antarctic climate science
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14304
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
SCAR
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
SCAR
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14304
op_rights All Rights Reserved
_version_ 1766250908789768192