Communicating Antarctic Climate Science
Many societal-political aspects of climate change act as barriers to positive climate change action. Despite the efforts of scientific researchers, stakeholders and the media, effective and accurate communication of Antarctic science is below an acceptable standard. The findings and implications of...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Other/Unknown Material |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14304 |
id |
ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14304 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14304 2023-05-15T13:49:08+02:00 Communicating Antarctic Climate Science Schroeter, Serena Lowther, Nick Kelman, Emma Marcus, Arnold 2015 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14304 English en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14304 All Rights Reserved Theses / Dissertations 2015 ftunivcanter 2022-09-08T13:40:19Z Many societal-political aspects of climate change act as barriers to positive climate change action. Despite the efforts of scientific researchers, stakeholders and the media, effective and accurate communication of Antarctic science is below an acceptable standard. The findings and implications of high-quality Antarctic climate change science are failing to resonate with civil society and policy makers, dictating the need to reevaluate how members of society cognitively approach the contentious issue of climate change and how current Antarctic science communication resources are distributed. An individual’s worldview, cognitive mindset and religious dogmas in conjunction with misreporting and misinterpretation of climate science are all factors influencing how an individual responds to the climate change message but rarely have they been analysed together as a complete overview. In this report, we introduce a new approach, advising that climate scientists, policy makers and other relevant stakeholders are involved in all stages of science acquisition, legislation and decision making through a targeted boundary committee, strongly integrated with a thorough education, outreach and communication (EOC) approach, within SCAR, and tasked with communicating Antarctic science and its global teleconnections. We draw on the barriers identified through literature investigation to establish this recommendation. The incorporation of a strong EOC approach in climate science communication will provide the catalyst required for substantial climate change action. Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic SCAR University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository Antarctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository |
op_collection_id |
ftunivcanter |
language |
English |
description |
Many societal-political aspects of climate change act as barriers to positive climate change action. Despite the efforts of scientific researchers, stakeholders and the media, effective and accurate communication of Antarctic science is below an acceptable standard. The findings and implications of high-quality Antarctic climate change science are failing to resonate with civil society and policy makers, dictating the need to reevaluate how members of society cognitively approach the contentious issue of climate change and how current Antarctic science communication resources are distributed. An individual’s worldview, cognitive mindset and religious dogmas in conjunction with misreporting and misinterpretation of climate science are all factors influencing how an individual responds to the climate change message but rarely have they been analysed together as a complete overview. In this report, we introduce a new approach, advising that climate scientists, policy makers and other relevant stakeholders are involved in all stages of science acquisition, legislation and decision making through a targeted boundary committee, strongly integrated with a thorough education, outreach and communication (EOC) approach, within SCAR, and tasked with communicating Antarctic science and its global teleconnections. We draw on the barriers identified through literature investigation to establish this recommendation. The incorporation of a strong EOC approach in climate science communication will provide the catalyst required for substantial climate change action. |
format |
Other/Unknown Material |
author |
Schroeter, Serena Lowther, Nick Kelman, Emma Marcus, Arnold |
spellingShingle |
Schroeter, Serena Lowther, Nick Kelman, Emma Marcus, Arnold Communicating Antarctic Climate Science |
author_facet |
Schroeter, Serena Lowther, Nick Kelman, Emma Marcus, Arnold |
author_sort |
Schroeter, Serena |
title |
Communicating Antarctic Climate Science |
title_short |
Communicating Antarctic Climate Science |
title_full |
Communicating Antarctic Climate Science |
title_fullStr |
Communicating Antarctic Climate Science |
title_full_unstemmed |
Communicating Antarctic Climate Science |
title_sort |
communicating antarctic climate science |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14304 |
geographic |
Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic SCAR |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic SCAR |
op_relation |
http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14304 |
op_rights |
All Rights Reserved |
_version_ |
1766250908789768192 |