A Roadmap for Antarctic Science: Assessing the Effectiveness of the Antarctic Roadmap Challenges

Between 2012 and 2014 the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, with input from the wider Antarctic community, carried out an inclusive and transparent horizon scan to identify the critical questions that Antarctic science will need to address in the next 20 years. To address the logistical an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Glenny, Alison, Grayson, Stuart, Lee, KyungHo, Lord, Tom
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14298
id ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14298
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcanter:oai:ir.canterbury.ac.nz:10092/14298 2023-05-15T13:49:08+02:00 A Roadmap for Antarctic Science: Assessing the Effectiveness of the Antarctic Roadmap Challenges Glenny, Alison Grayson, Stuart Lee, KyungHo Lord, Tom 2017 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14298 English en eng http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14298 All Rights Reserved Theses / Dissertations 2017 ftunivcanter 2022-09-08T13:38:12Z Between 2012 and 2014 the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, with input from the wider Antarctic community, carried out an inclusive and transparent horizon scan to identify the critical questions that Antarctic science will need to address in the next 20 years. To address the logistical and practical requirements to answer these questions, the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs undertook the Antarctic Roadmap Challenges (ARC) project to identify the corresponding technology, infrastructure, access, and logistical requirements. Together the two projects deliver the Roadmap for Antarctic Science, which sets the agenda for research and development by national Antarctic programmes in the medium-term future. This report examines the development of the Roadmap for Antarctic Science and discusses potential ways to assess its success in influencing the policies and activities of national Antarctic programmes. It identifies several key opportunities and challenges in the implementation of the Roadmap, including the fostering of increased links between the Antarctic and wider scientific communities, shared infrastructure, effective publicprivate partnerships, substantial and stable funding, the impact of greater international interest in Antarctic affairs and the unique political environment regulated by the Antarctic Treaty System. It also considers the usefulness of the ARC Framework in assisting interested counties to develop national Antarctic programmes. The report concludes that the significance of the Roadmap for Antarctic Science lies in its shaping of the discussion about the future of Antarctic science, and that continued and strengthened international cooperation remains key to Antarctic research. Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository Antarctic The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection University of Canterbury, Christchurch: UC Research Repository
op_collection_id ftunivcanter
language English
description Between 2012 and 2014 the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, with input from the wider Antarctic community, carried out an inclusive and transparent horizon scan to identify the critical questions that Antarctic science will need to address in the next 20 years. To address the logistical and practical requirements to answer these questions, the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs undertook the Antarctic Roadmap Challenges (ARC) project to identify the corresponding technology, infrastructure, access, and logistical requirements. Together the two projects deliver the Roadmap for Antarctic Science, which sets the agenda for research and development by national Antarctic programmes in the medium-term future. This report examines the development of the Roadmap for Antarctic Science and discusses potential ways to assess its success in influencing the policies and activities of national Antarctic programmes. It identifies several key opportunities and challenges in the implementation of the Roadmap, including the fostering of increased links between the Antarctic and wider scientific communities, shared infrastructure, effective publicprivate partnerships, substantial and stable funding, the impact of greater international interest in Antarctic affairs and the unique political environment regulated by the Antarctic Treaty System. It also considers the usefulness of the ARC Framework in assisting interested counties to develop national Antarctic programmes. The report concludes that the significance of the Roadmap for Antarctic Science lies in its shaping of the discussion about the future of Antarctic science, and that continued and strengthened international cooperation remains key to Antarctic research.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Glenny, Alison
Grayson, Stuart
Lee, KyungHo
Lord, Tom
spellingShingle Glenny, Alison
Grayson, Stuart
Lee, KyungHo
Lord, Tom
A Roadmap for Antarctic Science: Assessing the Effectiveness of the Antarctic Roadmap Challenges
author_facet Glenny, Alison
Grayson, Stuart
Lee, KyungHo
Lord, Tom
author_sort Glenny, Alison
title A Roadmap for Antarctic Science: Assessing the Effectiveness of the Antarctic Roadmap Challenges
title_short A Roadmap for Antarctic Science: Assessing the Effectiveness of the Antarctic Roadmap Challenges
title_full A Roadmap for Antarctic Science: Assessing the Effectiveness of the Antarctic Roadmap Challenges
title_fullStr A Roadmap for Antarctic Science: Assessing the Effectiveness of the Antarctic Roadmap Challenges
title_full_unstemmed A Roadmap for Antarctic Science: Assessing the Effectiveness of the Antarctic Roadmap Challenges
title_sort roadmap for antarctic science: assessing the effectiveness of the antarctic roadmap challenges
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14298
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/10092/14298
op_rights All Rights Reserved
_version_ 1766250880779157504