The disputed sound of the aurora borealis: sensing liminal noise during the First and Second International Polar Years, 1882–3 and 1932–3

<jats:p> This paper discusses heightened interest in the potential audibility of the aurora borealis during the First and Second International Polar Years (IPYs) of 1882–3 and 1932–3. Galvanized by a growing volume of local accounts expressing belief in the elusive noises, written by the inhab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amery, Fiona
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2021
Subjects:
IPY
Online Access:https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/327238
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.74687
id ftunivcam:oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/327238
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcam:oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/327238 2023-10-29T02:37:28+01:00 The disputed sound of the aurora borealis: sensing liminal noise during the First and Second International Polar Years, 1882–3 and 1932–3 Amery, Fiona 2021-08-26T18:36:02Z application/pdf text/xml https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/327238 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.74687 en eng The Royal Society Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/327238 doi:10.17863/CAM.74687 Research articles aurora borealis sound International Polar Year polar science senses Article 2021 ftunivcam https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.74687 2023-10-05T22:19:36Z <jats:p> This paper discusses heightened interest in the potential audibility of the aurora borealis during the First and Second International Polar Years (IPYs) of 1882–3 and 1932–3. Galvanized by a growing volume of local accounts expressing belief in the elusive noises, written by the inhabitants of the Shetland Islands, northern Canada, and Norway, auroral researchers of each era were determined to establish the objectivity of auroral sound. There was considerable speculation within the auroral research community as to whether the apparent noises were imagined or illusory, connected to discussions about the possibility of low-altitude aurorae. The anglophone auroral sound debate primarily played out within the official reports of IPY expeditions, the journal <jats:italic>Nature</jats:italic> , and a Shetland Island newspaper. I argue that the embodied senses were used exclusively to register the liminal sounds of the aurora across the two periods, despite developments in sound recording technologies, the primacy of mechanical objectivity, and instruments transported to the polar regions for the investigation of visual features of the phenomenon. This overlooked episode complicates narratives of polar science in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries by revealing a faith in the corporeal senses and the significant role of amateur observers. </jats:p> Article in Journal/Newspaper International Polar Year IPY Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
institution Open Polar
collection Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
op_collection_id ftunivcam
language English
topic Research articles
aurora borealis
sound
International Polar Year
polar science
senses
spellingShingle Research articles
aurora borealis
sound
International Polar Year
polar science
senses
Amery, Fiona
The disputed sound of the aurora borealis: sensing liminal noise during the First and Second International Polar Years, 1882–3 and 1932–3
topic_facet Research articles
aurora borealis
sound
International Polar Year
polar science
senses
description <jats:p> This paper discusses heightened interest in the potential audibility of the aurora borealis during the First and Second International Polar Years (IPYs) of 1882–3 and 1932–3. Galvanized by a growing volume of local accounts expressing belief in the elusive noises, written by the inhabitants of the Shetland Islands, northern Canada, and Norway, auroral researchers of each era were determined to establish the objectivity of auroral sound. There was considerable speculation within the auroral research community as to whether the apparent noises were imagined or illusory, connected to discussions about the possibility of low-altitude aurorae. The anglophone auroral sound debate primarily played out within the official reports of IPY expeditions, the journal <jats:italic>Nature</jats:italic> , and a Shetland Island newspaper. I argue that the embodied senses were used exclusively to register the liminal sounds of the aurora across the two periods, despite developments in sound recording technologies, the primacy of mechanical objectivity, and instruments transported to the polar regions for the investigation of visual features of the phenomenon. This overlooked episode complicates narratives of polar science in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries by revealing a faith in the corporeal senses and the significant role of amateur observers. </jats:p>
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Amery, Fiona
author_facet Amery, Fiona
author_sort Amery, Fiona
title The disputed sound of the aurora borealis: sensing liminal noise during the First and Second International Polar Years, 1882–3 and 1932–3
title_short The disputed sound of the aurora borealis: sensing liminal noise during the First and Second International Polar Years, 1882–3 and 1932–3
title_full The disputed sound of the aurora borealis: sensing liminal noise during the First and Second International Polar Years, 1882–3 and 1932–3
title_fullStr The disputed sound of the aurora borealis: sensing liminal noise during the First and Second International Polar Years, 1882–3 and 1932–3
title_full_unstemmed The disputed sound of the aurora borealis: sensing liminal noise during the First and Second International Polar Years, 1882–3 and 1932–3
title_sort disputed sound of the aurora borealis: sensing liminal noise during the first and second international polar years, 1882–3 and 1932–3
publisher The Royal Society
publishDate 2021
url https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/327238
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.74687
genre International Polar Year
IPY
genre_facet International Polar Year
IPY
op_relation https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/327238
doi:10.17863/CAM.74687
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.74687
_version_ 1781062257536401408