On the provenance of a historic sledge shoe fragment, said to have been collected by Edward Wilson at the South Pole in 1912

This paper discusses the authentication of a metal sledge shoe fragment, believed by the owner to have been collected by Edward Wilson close to the South Pole on 18 January 1912. Microscopic and elemental analysis show that the object is made from ‘German silver’, a copper alloy used only on Norwegi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rowe, RSW
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/265969
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.11236
id ftunivcam:oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/265969
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcam:oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/265969 2024-02-04T09:55:27+01:00 On the provenance of a historic sledge shoe fragment, said to have been collected by Edward Wilson at the South Pole in 1912 Rowe, RSW 2017-07 application/pdf https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/265969 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.11236 eng eng Cambridge University Press http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0032247417000365 Polar Record https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/265969 doi:10.17863/CAM.11236 4303 Historical Studies 50 Philosophy and Religious Studies 43 History Heritage and Archaeology 5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields Article 2017 ftunivcam https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.11236 2024-01-11T23:26:23Z This paper discusses the authentication of a metal sledge shoe fragment, believed by the owner to have been collected by Edward Wilson close to the South Pole on 18 January 1912. Microscopic and elemental analysis show that the object is made from ‘German silver’, a copper alloy used only on Norwegian Nansen-style sledges in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, and that it was used to clad a tapering sledge runner end about 10 mm thick. By comparing related objects, including sledges used by Amundsen and Scott in their South Pole journeys and a sledge from the Discovery Expedition, we show that the object cannot have come from an English sledge, but would have fitted one of Amundsen's modified sledges. Written sources have been extensively searched, but no direct written provenance for the object exists. However, contemporary Norwegian and British accounts explain specific features of the object and exclude other possible provenances. We conclude that it is most likely that the proposed provenance and history attached to this artefact are correct. The author is supported by the United Kingdom Antarctic Heritage Trust. The research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic South pole South pole Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository Antarctic South Pole
institution Open Polar
collection Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
op_collection_id ftunivcam
language English
topic 4303 Historical Studies
50 Philosophy and Religious Studies
43 History
Heritage and Archaeology
5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields
spellingShingle 4303 Historical Studies
50 Philosophy and Religious Studies
43 History
Heritage and Archaeology
5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields
Rowe, RSW
On the provenance of a historic sledge shoe fragment, said to have been collected by Edward Wilson at the South Pole in 1912
topic_facet 4303 Historical Studies
50 Philosophy and Religious Studies
43 History
Heritage and Archaeology
5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields
description This paper discusses the authentication of a metal sledge shoe fragment, believed by the owner to have been collected by Edward Wilson close to the South Pole on 18 January 1912. Microscopic and elemental analysis show that the object is made from ‘German silver’, a copper alloy used only on Norwegian Nansen-style sledges in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, and that it was used to clad a tapering sledge runner end about 10 mm thick. By comparing related objects, including sledges used by Amundsen and Scott in their South Pole journeys and a sledge from the Discovery Expedition, we show that the object cannot have come from an English sledge, but would have fitted one of Amundsen's modified sledges. Written sources have been extensively searched, but no direct written provenance for the object exists. However, contemporary Norwegian and British accounts explain specific features of the object and exclude other possible provenances. We conclude that it is most likely that the proposed provenance and history attached to this artefact are correct. The author is supported by the United Kingdom Antarctic Heritage Trust. The research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rowe, RSW
author_facet Rowe, RSW
author_sort Rowe, RSW
title On the provenance of a historic sledge shoe fragment, said to have been collected by Edward Wilson at the South Pole in 1912
title_short On the provenance of a historic sledge shoe fragment, said to have been collected by Edward Wilson at the South Pole in 1912
title_full On the provenance of a historic sledge shoe fragment, said to have been collected by Edward Wilson at the South Pole in 1912
title_fullStr On the provenance of a historic sledge shoe fragment, said to have been collected by Edward Wilson at the South Pole in 1912
title_full_unstemmed On the provenance of a historic sledge shoe fragment, said to have been collected by Edward Wilson at the South Pole in 1912
title_sort on the provenance of a historic sledge shoe fragment, said to have been collected by edward wilson at the south pole in 1912
publisher Cambridge University Press
publishDate 2017
url https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/265969
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.11236
geographic Antarctic
South Pole
geographic_facet Antarctic
South Pole
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
South pole
South pole
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
South pole
South pole
op_relation https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/265969
doi:10.17863/CAM.11236
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.11236
_version_ 1789959435919032320