Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses
Many animals partition resources to avoid competition, and in colonially-breeding species this often leads to divergent space or habitat use. During the non-breeding season, foraging constraints are relaxed, yet the patterns and drivers of segregation both between and within populations are poorly u...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/264011 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9372 |
id |
ftunivcam:oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/264011 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivcam:oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/264011 2024-02-04T09:53:32+01:00 Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses Clay, TA Manica, A Ryan, PG Silk, JRD Croxall, JP Ireland, L Phillips, RA 2016-07-21 application/pdf https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/264011 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9372 eng eng Nature Publishing Group http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29932 Scientific Reports https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/264011 doi:10.17863/CAM.9372 Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Animals Breeding Butterflies Ecosystem Geography Islands Population Dynamics Seasons Article 2016 ftunivcam https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9372 2024-01-11T23:32:53Z Many animals partition resources to avoid competition, and in colonially-breeding species this often leads to divergent space or habitat use. During the non-breeding season, foraging constraints are relaxed, yet the patterns and drivers of segregation both between and within populations are poorly understood. We modelled habitat preference to examine how extrinsic (habitat availability and intra-specific competition) and intrinsic factors (population, sex and breeding outcome) influence the distributions of non-breeding grey-headed albatrosses $\textit{Thalassarche}$ chrysostoma tracked from two major populations, South Georgia (Atlantic Ocean) and the Prince Edward Islands (Indian Ocean). Spatial segregation was greater than expected, reflecting distinct seasonal differences in habitat selection and accessibility, and avoidance of intra-specific competition with local breeders. Previously failed birds segregated spatially from successful birds during summer, when they used less productive waters, suggesting a link between breeding outcome and subsequent habitat selection. In contrast, we found weak evidence of sexual segregation, which did not reflect a difference in habitat use. Our results indicate that the large-scale spatial structuring of albatross distributions results from interactions between extrinsic and intrinsic factors, with important implications for population dynamics. As habitat preferences differed substantially between colonies, populations should be considered independently when identifying critical areas for protection. TAC was supported by a studentship funded as part of Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Standard Grant NE/J021083/1. This study represents a contribution to the Ecosystems component of the British Antarctic Survey Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme, funded by NERC. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic British Antarctic Survey Prince Edward Islands Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository Antarctic Indian Tac ENVELOPE(-59.517,-59.517,-62.500,-62.500) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository |
op_collection_id |
ftunivcam |
language |
English |
topic |
Animals Breeding Butterflies Ecosystem Geography Islands Population Dynamics Seasons |
spellingShingle |
Animals Breeding Butterflies Ecosystem Geography Islands Population Dynamics Seasons Clay, TA Manica, A Ryan, PG Silk, JRD Croxall, JP Ireland, L Phillips, RA Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses |
topic_facet |
Animals Breeding Butterflies Ecosystem Geography Islands Population Dynamics Seasons |
description |
Many animals partition resources to avoid competition, and in colonially-breeding species this often leads to divergent space or habitat use. During the non-breeding season, foraging constraints are relaxed, yet the patterns and drivers of segregation both between and within populations are poorly understood. We modelled habitat preference to examine how extrinsic (habitat availability and intra-specific competition) and intrinsic factors (population, sex and breeding outcome) influence the distributions of non-breeding grey-headed albatrosses $\textit{Thalassarche}$ chrysostoma tracked from two major populations, South Georgia (Atlantic Ocean) and the Prince Edward Islands (Indian Ocean). Spatial segregation was greater than expected, reflecting distinct seasonal differences in habitat selection and accessibility, and avoidance of intra-specific competition with local breeders. Previously failed birds segregated spatially from successful birds during summer, when they used less productive waters, suggesting a link between breeding outcome and subsequent habitat selection. In contrast, we found weak evidence of sexual segregation, which did not reflect a difference in habitat use. Our results indicate that the large-scale spatial structuring of albatross distributions results from interactions between extrinsic and intrinsic factors, with important implications for population dynamics. As habitat preferences differed substantially between colonies, populations should be considered independently when identifying critical areas for protection. TAC was supported by a studentship funded as part of Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Standard Grant NE/J021083/1. This study represents a contribution to the Ecosystems component of the British Antarctic Survey Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme, funded by NERC. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Clay, TA Manica, A Ryan, PG Silk, JRD Croxall, JP Ireland, L Phillips, RA |
author_facet |
Clay, TA Manica, A Ryan, PG Silk, JRD Croxall, JP Ireland, L Phillips, RA |
author_sort |
Clay, TA |
title |
Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses |
title_short |
Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses |
title_full |
Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses |
title_fullStr |
Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses |
title_sort |
proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/264011 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9372 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-59.517,-59.517,-62.500,-62.500) |
geographic |
Antarctic Indian Tac |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic Indian Tac |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic British Antarctic Survey Prince Edward Islands |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic British Antarctic Survey Prince Edward Islands |
op_relation |
https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/264011 doi:10.17863/CAM.9372 |
op_rights |
Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9372 |
_version_ |
1789966527498289152 |