Co-management as an Ethical Space of Engagement: Prospects for Reconciliation in Vuntut National Park

• Main Authors: Bruce, Kai, Mulrennan, Monica
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: The Arctic Institute of North America 2024
• Subjects: co-management; northern national parks; ethical space; Indigenous peoples; Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation; Parks Canada; comprehensive land claims; Indigenous engagement; reconciliation; self-determination; Indigenous governance; cogestion; parcs nationaux du nord; cadre éthique; peuples autochtones; Première Nation des Gwitchin Vuntut; Parcs Canada; revendications territoriales globales; engagement autochtone; réconciliation; autodétermination; gouvernance autochtone; Canada; Arctic; Gwitchin; Vuntut national park
• Online Access: https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/79052

Parks Canada’s commitments to reconciliation marks a significant shift in the governing paradigm of national parks, moving away from a colonial framework towards models that respect and elevate Indigenous forms of governance and knowledge systems. However, the extent to which a land claims–based co-management model, as the dominant mechanism of governance and engagement employed by Parks Canada, can serve as a vehicle for reconciliation is an open question. This paper endeavours to better understand the relational dynamics of co-management for their potential to advance reconciliation in national park settings. Using the lens of ethical space, we identify factors that either facilitate or impede relationship building between Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation and Parks Canada in the co-management of Vuntut National Park. Insights from semi-structured interviews conducted in 2021 with 11 community members and park managers indicate that an evolving-management relationship is sustained through extensive community engagement and Parks Canada’s support for strengthening community connections to the land. By adopting an ethical space framework for analysis, we were able to highlight different conditions and elements necessary for a protected-area co-management arrangement to serve as a solid foundation for reconciliation. Our analysis also revealed various structural impediments to the establishment of an ethical space conducive to reconciliation, particularly in the context of co-management arrangements based on land-claims agreements. These challenges included: discrepancies in approaches to protected-area management between Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation and Parks Canada, further complicated by the governance system employed by Parks Canada; issues of scale related to Parks Canada’s nested management structure, which affected relationship building between co-managers; financial constraints; and capacity constraints. Les engagements de Parcs Canada en matière de réconciliation constituent un important virage par rapport ...