Inuit Attitudes towards Co-Managing Wildlife in Three Communities in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut, Canada

We explored Inuit attitudes towards co-managing wildlife in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut, Canada, working in partnership with the hunters and trappers’ organizations of Igluligaarjuk (Chesterfield Inlet), Tikirarjuaq (Whale Cove), and Qamani’tuaq (Baker Lake). In mixed-methods interviews, study pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ARCTIC
Main Authors: Lokken, Nils A.A., Clark, Douglas A., Broderstad, Else G., Hausner, Vera H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Arctic Institute of North America 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/67868
_version_ 1835009333319958528
author Lokken, Nils A.A.
Clark, Douglas A.
Broderstad, Else G.
Hausner, Vera H.
author_facet Lokken, Nils A.A.
Clark, Douglas A.
Broderstad, Else G.
Hausner, Vera H.
author_sort Lokken, Nils A.A.
collection Unknown
container_issue 1
container_start_page 58
container_title ARCTIC
container_volume 72
description We explored Inuit attitudes towards co-managing wildlife in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut, Canada, working in partnership with the hunters and trappers’ organizations of Igluligaarjuk (Chesterfield Inlet), Tikirarjuaq (Whale Cove), and Qamani’tuaq (Baker Lake). In mixed-methods interviews, study participants in the two coastal communities described dissatisfaction with polar bear (Ursus maritimus) management outcomes, in contrast to a general satisfaction with (or indifference to) the management of other species. Interviewees expressed concern about grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) and, more prominently, caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) populations in Qamani’tuaq, the inland community. Researchers have predicted that conflicts specific to polar bear management could lead to regulations being ignored or even defied and endanger the entire system of wildlife co-management. Our results indicate that dissatisfaction over decisions is specific to polar bear management outcomes and does not necessarily apply to the broader system of wildlife co-management. The results suggest that the Nunavut wildlife co-management system is quite functional: polar bear issues aside, Inuit in Qamani’tuaq, Tikirarjuaq, and Igluligaarjuk are largely content with the current functioning of the wildlife co-management regime. Nous avons étudié les attitudes des Inuits à l’égard de la cogestion de la faune dans la région de Kivalliq, au Nunavut, Canada, en collaboration avec les organisations de chasseurs et de trappeurs d’Igluligaarjuk (inlet Chesterfield), de Tikirarjuaq (Whale Cove) et de Qamani’tuaq (Baker Lake). Dans le cadre d’entretiens effectués au moyen de diverses méthodes, les participants à l’étude des deux collectivités côtières ont exprimé leur mécontentement à l’égard des résultats de la gestion de l’ours polaire (Ursus maritimus), comparativement à leur satisfaction générale (ou à leur indifférence) quant à la gestion des autres espèces. Par ailleurs, les personnes interrogées ont exprimé des inquiétudes par rapport ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic
Baker Lake
Chesterfield Inlet
inuit
inuits
Kivalliq
Nunavut
ours polaire
Rangifer tarandus
Ursus arctos
Ursus maritimus
Whale Cove
genre_facet Arctic
Baker Lake
Chesterfield Inlet
inuit
inuits
Kivalliq
Nunavut
ours polaire
Rangifer tarandus
Ursus arctos
Ursus maritimus
Whale Cove
geographic Canada
Chesterfield Inlet
Nunavut
geographic_facet Canada
Chesterfield Inlet
Nunavut
id ftunivcalgaryojs:oai:journalhosting.ucalgary.ca:article/67868
institution Open Polar
language English
long_lat ENVELOPE(-90.705,-90.705,63.342,63.342)
op_collection_id ftunivcalgaryojs
op_container_end_page 70
op_relation https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/67868/51717
https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/67868
op_rights Copyright (c) 2019 ARCTIC
op_source ARCTIC; Vol. 72 No. 1 (2019): March: 1-102; 58-70
1923-1245
0004-0843
publishDate 2019
publisher The Arctic Institute of North America
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcalgaryojs:oai:journalhosting.ucalgary.ca:article/67868 2025-06-15T14:15:21+00:00 Inuit Attitudes towards Co-Managing Wildlife in Three Communities in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut, Canada Lokken, Nils A.A. Clark, Douglas A. Broderstad, Else G. Hausner, Vera H. 2019-03-31 application/pdf https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/67868 eng eng The Arctic Institute of North America https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/67868/51717 https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/67868 Copyright (c) 2019 ARCTIC ARCTIC; Vol. 72 No. 1 (2019): March: 1-102; 58-70 1923-1245 0004-0843 attitudes Qamani’tuaq Igluligaarjuk Tikirarjuaq co-management Nunavut polar bear Ursus maritimus cogestion ours polaire info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion research-article 2019 ftunivcalgaryojs 2025-05-27T03:29:43Z We explored Inuit attitudes towards co-managing wildlife in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut, Canada, working in partnership with the hunters and trappers’ organizations of Igluligaarjuk (Chesterfield Inlet), Tikirarjuaq (Whale Cove), and Qamani’tuaq (Baker Lake). In mixed-methods interviews, study participants in the two coastal communities described dissatisfaction with polar bear (Ursus maritimus) management outcomes, in contrast to a general satisfaction with (or indifference to) the management of other species. Interviewees expressed concern about grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) and, more prominently, caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) populations in Qamani’tuaq, the inland community. Researchers have predicted that conflicts specific to polar bear management could lead to regulations being ignored or even defied and endanger the entire system of wildlife co-management. Our results indicate that dissatisfaction over decisions is specific to polar bear management outcomes and does not necessarily apply to the broader system of wildlife co-management. The results suggest that the Nunavut wildlife co-management system is quite functional: polar bear issues aside, Inuit in Qamani’tuaq, Tikirarjuaq, and Igluligaarjuk are largely content with the current functioning of the wildlife co-management regime. Nous avons étudié les attitudes des Inuits à l’égard de la cogestion de la faune dans la région de Kivalliq, au Nunavut, Canada, en collaboration avec les organisations de chasseurs et de trappeurs d’Igluligaarjuk (inlet Chesterfield), de Tikirarjuaq (Whale Cove) et de Qamani’tuaq (Baker Lake). Dans le cadre d’entretiens effectués au moyen de diverses méthodes, les participants à l’étude des deux collectivités côtières ont exprimé leur mécontentement à l’égard des résultats de la gestion de l’ours polaire (Ursus maritimus), comparativement à leur satisfaction générale (ou à leur indifférence) quant à la gestion des autres espèces. Par ailleurs, les personnes interrogées ont exprimé des inquiétudes par rapport ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Baker Lake Chesterfield Inlet inuit inuits Kivalliq Nunavut ours polaire Rangifer tarandus Ursus arctos Ursus maritimus Whale Cove Unknown Canada Chesterfield Inlet ENVELOPE(-90.705,-90.705,63.342,63.342) Nunavut ARCTIC 72 1 58 70
spellingShingle attitudes
Qamani’tuaq
Igluligaarjuk
Tikirarjuaq
co-management
Nunavut
polar bear
Ursus maritimus
cogestion
ours polaire
Lokken, Nils A.A.
Clark, Douglas A.
Broderstad, Else G.
Hausner, Vera H.
Inuit Attitudes towards Co-Managing Wildlife in Three Communities in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut, Canada
title Inuit Attitudes towards Co-Managing Wildlife in Three Communities in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut, Canada
title_full Inuit Attitudes towards Co-Managing Wildlife in Three Communities in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut, Canada
title_fullStr Inuit Attitudes towards Co-Managing Wildlife in Three Communities in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Inuit Attitudes towards Co-Managing Wildlife in Three Communities in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut, Canada
title_short Inuit Attitudes towards Co-Managing Wildlife in Three Communities in the Kivalliq Region of Nunavut, Canada
title_sort inuit attitudes towards co-managing wildlife in three communities in the kivalliq region of nunavut, canada
topic attitudes
Qamani’tuaq
Igluligaarjuk
Tikirarjuaq
co-management
Nunavut
polar bear
Ursus maritimus
cogestion
ours polaire
topic_facet attitudes
Qamani’tuaq
Igluligaarjuk
Tikirarjuaq
co-management
Nunavut
polar bear
Ursus maritimus
cogestion
ours polaire
url https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/67868