State Jurisdiction over Ice Island T-3 : The Escamilla Case

The matter of State jurisdiction over ice islands in the Arctic Ocean is no longer only an academic question raised by professors of international law. A recent incident involving the killing of a member of an American research team on Ice Island T-3 raises that question in a very realistic way. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ARCTIC
Main Author: Pharand, Donat
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: The Arctic Institute of North America 1971
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/66169
_version_ 1835009218382397440
author Pharand, Donat
author_facet Pharand, Donat
author_sort Pharand, Donat
collection Unknown
container_issue 2
container_title ARCTIC
container_volume 24
description The matter of State jurisdiction over ice islands in the Arctic Ocean is no longer only an academic question raised by professors of international law. A recent incident involving the killing of a member of an American research team on Ice Island T-3 raises that question in a very realistic way. The purpose of this short paper is to review the relevant facts and to offer a few comments on the issue of jurisdiction in the light of the legal nature of the Arctic Ocean and of Ice Island T-3. On 16 July 1970, the shooting of the leader of a 20-man joint government-industry research team, one Bennie Lightsy of Louisville, Kentucky, took place in a hut on Ice Island T-3 (the third ice island sighted as a radar target, hence its name T-3), floating in the Arctic Ocean at 84° 47' North latitude and 106° 28' West longitude, within the so-called Canadian sector. Lightsy had gone to the hut to attempt to settle an argument over a jug of wine when he was shot with a rifle by one Mario Escamilla, a Mexican-born American citizen from California. Following a radio report about the incident, an American investigation team, composed of Naval and Coast Guard Intelligence officers and an Assistant U.S. Attorney, flew to Thule, an American Air Force Base in Greenland, and then to the ice island in question. Upon completion of the investigation, Escamilla was brought to the United States, after a change of plane at Thule, and landed at Dulles airport in Virginia. He was initially charged with murder in the first degree before a magistrate in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, within which Dulles airport is located, and was subsequently indicted by a grand jury for the lesser offence of second degree murder. The issue raised is whether the United States or Canada, or both, had jurisdiction over the alleged crime committed on Ice Island T-3. The complaint stated that the ice island was floating on the high seas within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States of America and out of the ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic
Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Greenland
Thule
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Greenland
Thule
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Baxter
Canada
Greenland
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Baxter
Canada
Greenland
id ftunivcalgaryojs:oai:journalhosting.ucalgary.ca:article/66169
institution Open Polar
language English
long_lat ENVELOPE(162.533,162.533,-74.367,-74.367)
op_collection_id ftunivcalgaryojs
op_relation https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/66169/50082
https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/66169
op_source ARCTIC; Vol. 24 No. 2 (1971): June: 81–152; 82-89
1923-1245
0004-0843
publishDate 1971
publisher The Arctic Institute of North America
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivcalgaryojs:oai:journalhosting.ucalgary.ca:article/66169 2025-06-15T14:15:04+00:00 State Jurisdiction over Ice Island T-3 : The Escamilla Case Pharand, Donat 1971-01-01 application/pdf https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/66169 eng eng The Arctic Institute of North America https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/66169/50082 https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/66169 ARCTIC; Vol. 24 No. 2 (1971): June: 81–152; 82-89 1923-1245 0004-0843 MacMillan Donald Baxter 1874-1970 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion article-commentary 1971 ftunivcalgaryojs 2025-05-27T03:29:43Z The matter of State jurisdiction over ice islands in the Arctic Ocean is no longer only an academic question raised by professors of international law. A recent incident involving the killing of a member of an American research team on Ice Island T-3 raises that question in a very realistic way. The purpose of this short paper is to review the relevant facts and to offer a few comments on the issue of jurisdiction in the light of the legal nature of the Arctic Ocean and of Ice Island T-3. On 16 July 1970, the shooting of the leader of a 20-man joint government-industry research team, one Bennie Lightsy of Louisville, Kentucky, took place in a hut on Ice Island T-3 (the third ice island sighted as a radar target, hence its name T-3), floating in the Arctic Ocean at 84° 47' North latitude and 106° 28' West longitude, within the so-called Canadian sector. Lightsy had gone to the hut to attempt to settle an argument over a jug of wine when he was shot with a rifle by one Mario Escamilla, a Mexican-born American citizen from California. Following a radio report about the incident, an American investigation team, composed of Naval and Coast Guard Intelligence officers and an Assistant U.S. Attorney, flew to Thule, an American Air Force Base in Greenland, and then to the ice island in question. Upon completion of the investigation, Escamilla was brought to the United States, after a change of plane at Thule, and landed at Dulles airport in Virginia. He was initially charged with murder in the first degree before a magistrate in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, within which Dulles airport is located, and was subsequently indicted by a grand jury for the lesser offence of second degree murder. The issue raised is whether the United States or Canada, or both, had jurisdiction over the alleged crime committed on Ice Island T-3. The complaint stated that the ice island was floating on the high seas within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States of America and out of the ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Arctic Ocean Greenland Thule Unknown Arctic Arctic Ocean Baxter ENVELOPE(162.533,162.533,-74.367,-74.367) Canada Greenland ARCTIC 24 2
spellingShingle MacMillan
Donald Baxter
1874-1970
Pharand, Donat
State Jurisdiction over Ice Island T-3 : The Escamilla Case
title State Jurisdiction over Ice Island T-3 : The Escamilla Case
title_full State Jurisdiction over Ice Island T-3 : The Escamilla Case
title_fullStr State Jurisdiction over Ice Island T-3 : The Escamilla Case
title_full_unstemmed State Jurisdiction over Ice Island T-3 : The Escamilla Case
title_short State Jurisdiction over Ice Island T-3 : The Escamilla Case
title_sort state jurisdiction over ice island t-3 : the escamilla case
topic MacMillan
Donald Baxter
1874-1970
topic_facet MacMillan
Donald Baxter
1874-1970
url https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/view/66169